New Nd-Sr isotope-geochronological evidence of its affinity to the East-Scandinavian Large Igneous Province (The Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa gabbro-anorthosite complex, Russia)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Steshenko ◽  
Pavel Serov ◽  
Evgeniy Kunakkuzin ◽  
Nadezhda Ekimova ◽  
Dmitriy Elizarov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Igneous Province ◽  
Layered Intrusions ◽  
Sr Isotope ◽  
Geochronological Data ◽  
Igneous Province ◽  
Rfbr Grant ◽  
Mantle Reservoir ◽  
The Baltic ◽  
Research Contract ◽  
Anorthosite Complex

<p>The article provides new Sm-Nd and Nd-Sr isotope-geochronological data on rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa gabbro-anorthosite complex.</p><p>The Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr studies have provided data on isotope compositions of neodymium and strontium in rocks of both massifs. The isotope compositions of neodymium (eNd) range from -0.02 in norites of the Kandalaksha massif to -5.53 in lens bodies of gneiss granites of the Kolvitsa massif</p><p>Weakly radiogenic values of eNd = -1.0 – -1.2 dominate, which complies with characteristic values of Paleoproterozoic layered intrusions in Fennoscandia. Isotope compositions of strontium ranging from 0.7013 to 0.7025 also reflect typical values of a Paleoproterozoic igneous province [.</p><p>New data suggest that the Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa gabbro-anorthosite complex is confined to the East-Scandinavian Large Igneous Province with a protracted evolution at the turn of 2.53-2.39 Ga. According to geochronological and isotope Nd-Sr data, rocks of the Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa complex seem to have the same anomalous mantle source with Paleoproterozoic layered intrusions in the Baltic Shield (Fig. 3). The latter include Cu-Ni-Co-Cr+PGE deposits in the Monchegorsk ore area and Pechenga, Cr ores in the Pados massif, Fe-Ti-V Kolvitsa deposit, PGE and Cu-Ni Fedorovo-Pana layered complex  and Burakovsky intrusion, Cu-Ni-Co+PGE deposits in Finland, i.e. Kemi, Penikat, Akanvaara, Kontelainen, Tornio and many other. These deposits formed at two episodes, 2.53-2.39 Ga and 2.0-1.8 Ga, that refer to the beginning of rifting and the late rifting stage of the Fennoscandian Shield evolution, respectively.</p><p>Rocks of these intrusions referred to the pyroxenite-gabbronorite-anorthosite formation have similar isotope-geochemical features:</p><p>1) according to U-Pb and Sm-Nd geochronological data, the formation time span is 2530 to 2380 Ma;</p><p>2) the mantle reservoir feeding magmas that formed the massifs is rich in lithophile elements;  I<sub>Sr</sub> values vary from 0.702 to 0.706, ε<sub>Nd</sub>(T) varies from +2 to -6;</p><p>3) the model Sm-Nd ages of T<sub>DM</sub> protoliths are 2.8-3.3 Ga.</p><p>The scientific research has been carried out in the framework of the State Research Contract of GI KSС RAS No. 0226-2019-0053, RFBR grant No. 18-05-70082 «Arctic’s Resources» and Presidium RAS Program No. 8.</p>

scholarly journals Enlargement of the area of the Timpton Large Igneous Province (ca. 1.75 ga) of the Siberian craton

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-839
Author(s):  
D. P. Gladkochub ◽  
T. V. Donskaya ◽  
R. E. Ernst ◽  
U. Söderlund ◽  
A. M. Mazukabzov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Siberian Craton ◽  
River Flow ◽  
Large Igneous Province ◽  
Dyke Swarm ◽  
Middle Section ◽  
Geochronological Data ◽  
Igneous Province

We present new geochronological data on dolerites from the Chaya dyke swarm of the Baikal inlier of the Siberian craton. The U‐Pb dating of baddeleyite from one dyke located at the SW end of the Chaya dyke swarm yielded an age of 1752±6 Ma, similar to the previously obtained age of a dyke in the NE end of this swarm. These ages estab‐ lish an age of 1752 Ma for a unified Chaya dyke swarm that extends for more than 200 km in the Baikal inlier of the Siberian craton. These new data confirm that the entire Chaya dyke swarm (as well as the Timpton‐Algamay and Eastern Anabar swarms) is a part of an overall radiating dyke swarm belonging to the Late Paleoproterozoic Timpton Large Igneous Province (LIP), the center of which is located in the middle section of the Vilyuy river flow. Thus, the LIP is enlarged to include the area further west in the Siberian craton.

scholarly journals Late Paleoproterozoic mafic magmatism and the Kalahari craton during Columbia assembly

Geology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric Djeutchou ◽  
Michiel O. de Kock ◽  
Hervé Wabo ◽  
Camilo E. Gaitán ◽  
Ulf Söderlund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Black Hills ◽  
Large Igneous Province ◽  
Ionization Mass ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Geochronological Data ◽  
Pb Isotope ◽  
Kalahari Craton ◽  
Igneous Province ◽  
Superior Craton

The 1.87–1.84 Ga Black Hills dike swarm of the Kalahari craton (South Africa) is coeval with several regional magmatic provinces used here to resolve the craton’s position during Columbia assembly. We report a new 1850 ± 4 Ma (U-Pb isotope dilution–thermal ionization mass spectrometry [ID-TIMS] on baddeleyite) crystallization age for one dike and new paleomagnetic data for 34 dikes of which 8 have precise U-Pb ages. Results are constrained by positive baked-contact and reversal tests, which combined with existing data produce a 1.87–1.84 Ga mean pole from 63 individual dikes. By integrating paleomagnetic and geochronological data sets, we calculate poles for three magmatic episodes and produce a magnetostratigraphic record. At 1.88 Ga, the Kalahari craton is reconstructed next to the Superior craton so that their ca. 2.0 Ga poles align. As such, magmatism forms part of a radiating pattern with the coeval ca. 1.88 Ga Circum-Superior large igneous province.

Congo-São Francisco at 1.11 Ga and the megacontinent Umkondia 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Salminen
Keyword(s):  
Large Igneous Province ◽  
Geochronological Data ◽  
Qualitative Comparison ◽  
Central Brazil ◽  
Northern India ◽  
Paleomagnetic Pole ◽  
Kalahari Craton ◽  
Igneous Province ◽  
The World ◽  
Tholeiitic Magmatism

<p>Currently three supercontinent cycles have been identified and existed supercontinents named from youngest to oldest: Pangea, Rodinia and Nuna/Columbia. Recently Wang et al. (2020) suggested that supercontinent amalgamation were each preceded by ~200 Myr by the assembly of long-lasting <em>megacontinent</em> aking to Gondwana.</p><p>The Congo-São Francisco (C/SF) craton is a main building block in Gondwana due to its central location, but its participation to Rodinia is controversial. Salminen et al. (2018) presented 1.11 Ga paleomagnetic and geochronological data from a prominent Epembe-Huila swarm of gabbronoritic dykes in the southern part of the Congo craton in Namibia and in Angola. This paleomagnetic pole yields a relatively low paleolatitude for the C/SF craton at ca. 1.11 Ga and permits a direct connection between Congo and Kalahari cratons. This connection supports an earlier qualitative comparison (Ernst et al., 2013), that the mafic Epembe-Huila swarm was an integral component of the Umkondo Large Igneous Province (LIP). The 1.11 Ga Umkondo LIP is widespread across Kalahari craton, and coeval mafic magmatism has been identified in several of the world’s other late Mesoproterozoic cratons: Laurentia, India, Amazonia, and Antarctica (Grunehogna). Were these coeval provinces spatially linked at the time of emplacement during the amalgamation of Rodinia? Robust paleomagnetic and geochronological data from Laurentia and Kalahari have demonstrated substantial separation between those two blocks at 1.11 Ga (Swanson-Hysell et al., 2015). However, based on similar tholeiitic magmatism Choudhary et al. (2019) proposed that Kalahari and C/SF together with Amazonia and northern India constituted “Umkondia” at 1.11 Ga. It has been proposed that Umkondia occupied an intermediary “megacontinental” role in the Nuna-Rodinia transition analogous to Gondwana in Rodinia-Pangea evolution (Wang et al., 2020). Contradicting Gondwana the proposed Umkondia was not long-lasting, since it has been proposed that Kalahari and Congo separated after 1.10 Ga to form a vast ocean (ca. 6000 km) during the formation of Rodinia and widespread juvenile intra-oceanic magmatism along the present-day central Brazil indicates a large ca. 0.94 Ga ocean between C/SF and Amazonia (Cordani et al., 2003).</p><p> </p><p>Choudhary et al. 2019. Precambrian Research 332, 105382.</p><p>Cordani et al. 2003. Gondwana Research 6, 275-283.</p><p>Ernst et al. 2003. Lithos 174 1-14.</p><p>Salminen et al. 2018. Geology 46, 1011-1014.</p><p>Swanson-Hysell et al. 2015. Geophysical Journal International 203, 2237-2247.</p><p>Wang et al. 2020. Geology 49, https://doi.org/10.1130/G47988.1</p><p> </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document