scholarly journals Supplementary material to "Quantifying the added value of high resolution climate models: A systematic comparison of WRF simulations for complex Himalayan terrain"

Author(s):  
Ramchandra Karki ◽  
Shabeh Hasson ◽  
Lars Gerlitz ◽  
Udo Schickhoff ◽  
Thomas Scholten ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
João António Martins Careto ◽  
Pedro Miguel Matos Soares ◽  
Rita Margarida Cardoso ◽  
Sixto Herrera ◽  
José Manuel Guttiérrez

Author(s):  
Liying Qiu ◽  
Eun-Soon Im

Abstract This study evaluates the resolution dependency of scaling precipitation with temperature from the perspective of the added value of high-resolution (5-km) dynamical downscaling using various kinds of long-term climate change projections over South Korea. Three CMIP5 Global Climate Models (GCMs) with different climate sensitivities, and one pseudo global warming (PGW) experiment, are downscaled by Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) one-way double nested modeling system with convective parameterization for the reference (1976-2005) and future (2071-2100) periods under RCP8.5 scenario. A detailed comparison of the driving GCM/PGW, 20-km mother simulation, and 5-km nested simulation demonstrates improved representation of precipitation with increasing resolution not only in the spatial pattern and magnitude for both the mean and the extremes, but also in a more realistic representation of extreme precipitation’s sensitivities to temperature. According to the projected precipitation changes downscaled from both GCM ensemble and PGW, there will be intensified precipitation, particularly for the extremes, over South Korea under the warming, which is primarily contributed by CP increase that shows higher temperature sensitivity. This study also compares the extreme precipitation-temperature scaling relations within-epoch (apparent scaling) and between-epoch (climate scaling). It confirms that the magnitude and spatial pattern of the two scaling rates can be quite different, and the precipitation change over Korea under global warming is mainly controlled by thermodynamic factors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1865-1887
Author(s):  
A. Senatore ◽  
S. Davolio ◽  
L. Furnari ◽  
G. Mendicino

AbstractReliable reanalysis products can be exploited to drive mesoscale numerical models and generate high-resolution reconstructions of high-impact weather events. Within this framework, regional weather and climate models may greatly benefit from the recent release of the ERA5 product, an improvement to the ERA-Interim dataset. In this study, two different convection-permitting models driven by these two reanalysis datasets are used to reproduce three heavy precipitation events affecting a Mediterranean region. Moreover, different sea surface temperature (SST) initializations are tested to assess how higher-resolution SST fields improve the simulation of high-impact events characterized by strong air–sea interactions. Finally, the coupling with a distributed hydrological model allows evaluating the impact at the ground, specifically assessing the possible added value of the ERA5 dataset for the high-resolution simulation of extreme hydrometeorological events over the Calabria region (southern Italy). Results, based on the comparison against multiple-source precipitation observations, show no clear systematic benefit to using the ERA5 dataset; moreover, intense convective activity can introduce uncertainties masking the signal provided by the boundary conditions of the different reanalyses. The effect of the high-resolution SST fields is even more difficult to detect. The uncertainties propagate and amplify along the modeling chain, where the spatial resolution increases up to the hydrological model. Nevertheless, even in very small catchments, some of the experiments provide reasonably accurate results, suggesting that an ensemble approach could be suitable to cope with uncertainties affecting the overall meteo-hydrological chain, especially for small catchments.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Ciarlo ◽  
Erika Coppola ◽  
Emanuela Pichelli ◽  
Jose Abraham Torres Alavez ◽  

<p>Downscaling data from General Circulation Models (GCMs) with Regional Climate Models (RCMs) is a computationally expensive process, even more so running at the convection permitting scale (CP). Despite the high-resolution products of these simulations, the Added Value (AV) of these runs compared to their driving models is an important factor for consideration. A new method was recently developed to quantify the AV of historical simulations as well as the Climate Change Downscaling Signal (CCDS) of forecast runs. This method presents these quantities spatially and thus the specific regions with the most AV can be identified and understood.</p><p>An analysis of daily precipitation from a 55-model EURO-CORDEX ensemble (at 12 km resolution) was assessed using this method. It revealed positive AV throughout the domain with greater emphasis in regions of complex topography, coast-lines, and the tropics. Similar CCDS was obtained when assessing the RCP 8.5 far future runs in these domains. This paper looks more closely at the CCDS obtained with this method and compares it to other climate change signals described in other studies.</p><p>The same method is now being applied to assess the AV and CCDS of daily precipitation from an ensemble of models at the CP scale (~3 km) over different domains within Europe. The current stage of the analysis is also looking into the AV of using hourly precipitation instead of daily.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 3501-3518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Lind ◽  
David Lindstedt ◽  
Erik Kjellström ◽  
Colin Jones

Abstract High-impact, locally intense rainfall episodes represent a major socioeconomic problem for societies worldwide, and at the same time these events are notoriously difficult to simulate properly in climate models. Here, the authors investigate how horizontal resolution and model formulation influence this issue by applying the HIRLAM–ALADIN Regional Mesoscale Operational NWP in Europe (HARMONIE) Climate (HCLIM) regional model with three different setups: two using convection parameterization at 15- and 6.25-km horizontal resolution (the latter within the “gray zone” scale), with lateral boundary conditions provided by ERA-Interim and integrated over a pan-European domain, and one with explicit convection at 2-km resolution (HCLIM2) over the Alpine region driven by the 15-km model. Seven summer seasons were sampled and validated against two high-resolution observational datasets. All HCLIM versions underestimate the number of dry days and hours by 20%–40% and overestimate precipitation over the Alpine ridge. Also, only modest added value was found for gray-zone resolution. However, the single most important outcome is the substantial added value in HCLIM2 compared to the coarser model versions at subdaily time scales. It better captures the local-to-regional spatial patterns of precipitation reflecting a more realistic representation of the local and mesoscale dynamics. Further, the duration and spatial frequency of precipitation events, as well as extremes, are closer to observations. These characteristics are key ingredients in heavy rainfall events and associated flash floods, and the outstanding results using HCLIM in a convection-permitting setting are convincing and encourage further use of the model to study changes in such events in changing climates.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Tabari ◽  
Rozemien De Troch ◽  
Olivier Giot ◽  
Rafiq Hamdi ◽  
Piet Termonia ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study explores whether climate models with higher spatial resolution provide higher accuracy for precipitation simulations and/or different climate change signals. The outputs from two convection-permitting climate models (ALARO and CCLM) with a spatial resolution of 3–4 km are compared with those from the coarse scale driving models or reanalysis data for simulating/projecting daily and sub-daily precipitation quantiles. The high-resolution ALARO and CCLM models reveal an added value to capture sub-daily precipitation extremes during summer compared to the driving GCMs and reanalysis data. Further validation of historical climate simulations based on design precipitation statistics derived from intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves shows a better match of the convection-permitting model results with the observations-based IDF statistics. Results moreover indicate that one has to be careful in assuming spatial scale independency of climate change signals for the delta change downscaling method, as high-resolution models may show larger changes in extreme precipitation. These larger changes appear to be dependent on the climate model, since such intensification is not observed for the ALARO model.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
João António Martins Careto ◽  
Pedro Miguel Matos Soares ◽  
Rita Margarida Cardoso ◽  
Sixto Herrera ◽  
José Manuel Gutiérrez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document