scholarly journals Global evaluation of gross primary productivity in the JULES land surface model v3.4.1

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2651-2670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren Slevin ◽  
Simon F. B. Tett ◽  
Jean-François Exbrayat ◽  
A. Anthony Bloom ◽  
Mathew Williams
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Gross Primary Productivity ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Annual Average ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract. This study evaluates the ability of the JULES land surface model (LSM) to simulate gross primary productivity (GPP) on regional and global scales for 2001–2010. Model simulations, performed at various spatial resolutions and driven with a variety of meteorological datasets (WFDEI-GPCC, WFDEI-CRU and PRINCETON), were compared to the MODIS GPP product, spatially gridded estimates of upscaled GPP from the FLUXNET network (FLUXNET-MTE) and the CARDAMOM terrestrial carbon cycle analysis. Firstly, when JULES was driven with the WFDEI-GPCC dataset (at 0. 5° × 0. 5° spatial resolution), the annual average global GPP simulated by JULES for 2001–2010 was higher than the observation-based estimates (MODIS and FLUXNET-MTE), by 25 and 8 %, respectively, and CARDAMOM estimates by 23 %. JULES was able to simulate the standard deviation of monthly GPP fluxes compared to CARDAMOM and the observation-based estimates on global scales. Secondly, GPP simulated by JULES for various biomes (forests, grasslands and shrubs) on global and regional scales were compared. Differences among JULES, MODIS, FLUXNET-MTE and CARDAMOM on global scales were due to differences in simulated GPP in the tropics. Thirdly, it was shown that spatial resolution (0. 5° × 0. 5°, 1° × 1° and 2° × 2°) had little impact on simulated GPP on these large scales, with global GPP ranging from 140 to 142 PgC year−1. Finally, the sensitivity of JULES to meteorological driving data, a major source of model uncertainty, was examined. Estimates of annual average global GPP were higher when JULES was driven with the PRINCETON meteorological dataset than when driven with the WFDEI-GPCC dataset by 3 PgC year−1. On regional scales, differences between the two were observed, with the WFDEI-GPCC-driven model simulations estimating higher GPP in the tropics (5° N–5° S) and the PRINCETON-driven model simulations estimating higher GPP in the extratropics (30–60° N).

scholarly journals Global Evaluation of Gross Primary Productivity in the JULES Land Surface Model

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren Slevin ◽  
Simon F. B. Tett ◽  
Jean-François Exbrayat ◽  
A. Anthony Bloom ◽  
Mathew Williams
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Gross Primary Productivity ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Annual Average ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract. This study evaluates the ability of the JULES Land Surface Model (LSM) to simulate Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) at regional and global scales for 2001–2010. Model simulations, performed at various spatial resolutions and driven with a variety of meteorological datasets (WFDEI-GPCC, WFDEI-CRU and PRINCETON), were compared to the MODIS GPP product, spatially gridded estimates of upscaled GPP from the FLUXNET network (FLUXNET-MTE) and the CARDAMOM terrestrial carbon cycle analysis. Firstly, JULES was found to simulate interannual variability (IAV) at global scales. When JULES was driven with the WFDEI-GPCC dataset (at 0.5º × 0.5º spatial resolution), it was found that the annual average global GPP simulated by JULES for 2001–2010 was higher than the observation-based estimates (MODIS and FLUXNET-MTE), by 25 % and 8 %, respectively, and CARDAMOM estimates by 23 %. Secondly, GPP fluxes simulated by JULES for various biomes (forests, grasslands and shrubs) at global and regional scales were compared. It was found that differences between JULES, FLUXNET-MTE, MODIS and CARDAMOM at global scales were mostly due to differences in the tropics with CARDAMOM performing better than JULES in this region. Thirdly, it was shown that spatial resolution (0.5º × 0.5º, 1º × 1º and 2º × 2º) had no impact on simulated GPP on these large scales. Finally, the sensitivity of JULES to meteorological driving data, a major source of model uncertainty, was examined. Estimates of annual average global GPP were higher when JULES was driven with the PRINCETON meteorological dataset than when driven with the WFDEI-GPCC dataset by 4 PgC year−1. At regional scales, differences between two were observed with the WFDEI-GPCC driven model simulations estimating higher GPP in the tropics (at 5º N–5º S) and the PRINCETON driven model simulations estimating higher GPP in the extratropics (at 30º N–60º N).

scholarly journals Scale Impact of Soil Moisture Observations to Noah-MP Land Surface Model Simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1169
Author(s):  
Jifu Yin ◽  
Xiwu Zhan
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Synthetic Experiment ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Coarse Spatial Resolution ◽  
Satellite Microwave ◽  
National Water

Due to the limitations of satellite antenna technology, current operational microwave soil moisture (SM) data products are typically at tens of kilometers spatial resolutions. Many approaches have thus been proposed to generate finer resolution SM data using ancillary information, but it is still unknown if assimilation of the finer spatial resolution SM data has beneficial impacts on model skills. In this paper, a synthetic experiment is thus conducted to identify the benefits of SM observations at a finer spatial resolution on the Noah-MP land surface model. Results of this study show that the performance of the Noah-MP model is significantly improved with the benefits of assimilating 1 km SM observations in comparison with the assimilation of SM data at coarser resolutions. Downscaling satellite microwave SM observations from coarse spatial resolution to 1 km resolution is recommended, and the assimilation of 1 km remotely sensed SM retrievals is suggested for NOAA National Weather Service and National Water Center.

scholarly journals Impacts of a Parameterization Deficiency on Offline and Coupled Land Surface Model Simulations

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 901-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuqiong Liu ◽  
Luis A. Bastidas ◽  
Hoshin V. Gupta ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Model Simulations

River parametrisation of the JULES land surface model for improved runoff routing at the global scale.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristeidis Koutroulis ◽  
Manolis Grillakis ◽  
Camilla Mathison ◽  
Eleanor Burke
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
River Flow ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Routing Scheme ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
River Flow Simulation ◽  
River Routing

<p>The JULES land surface model has a wide ranging application in studying different processes of the earth system including hydrological modeling [1]. Our aim is to tune the existing configuration of the global river routing scheme at 0.5<sup>o</sup> spatial resolution [2] and improve river flow simulation performance at finer temporal scales. To do so, we develop a factorial experiment of varying effective river velocity and meander coefficient, components of the Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP) river routing scheme. We test and adjust best performing configurations at the basin scale based on observations from GRDC 230 stations that exhibiting a variety of hydroclimatic and physiographic conditions. The analysis was focused on watersheds of near-natural conditions [3] to avoid potential influences of human management on river flow. The HydroATLAS database [4] was employed to identify basin scale descriptive hydro-environmental indicators that could be associated with the components of the TRIP. These indicators summarize hydrologic and physiographic characteristics of the drainage area of each flow gauge. For each basin we select the best performing set of TRIP parameters per basin resulting to the optimal efficiency of river flow simulation based on the Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency metrics. We find that better performance is driven predominantly by characteristics related to the stream gradient and terrain slope. These indicators can serve as descriptors for extrapolating the adjustment of TRIP parameters for global land configurations at 0.5<sup>o</sup> spatial resolution using regression models.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Papadimitriou et al 2017, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4379–4401</p><p>[2] Falloon et al 2007. Hadley Centre Tech. Note 72, 42 pp.</p><p>[3] Fang Zhao et al 2017 Environ. Res. Lett. 12 075003</p><p>[4] Linke et al 2019, Scientific Data 6: 283.</p>

scholarly journals Impacts of land surface model and land use data on WRF model simulations of rainfall and temperature over Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia

Heliyon ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e02469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achenafi Teklay ◽  
Yihun T. Dile ◽  
Dereje H. Asfaw ◽  
Haimanote K. Bayabil ◽  
Kibruyesfa Sisay
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Lake Tana ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Lake Tana Basin
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document