scholarly journals Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haipeng Lin ◽  
Daniel J. Jacob ◽  
Elizabeth W. Lundgren ◽  
Melissa P. Sulprizio ◽  
Christoph A. Keller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Interface Layer ◽  
Configuration File ◽  
System Model ◽  
Emission Inventories ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Data Input ◽  
Input Layer ◽  
Three Layer Architecture

Abstract. Emissions are a central component of atmospheric chemistry models. The Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) is a software component for computing emissions from a user-selected ensemble of emission inventories and algorithms. While available in standalone mode, HEMCO also provides a general on-line facility for models to compute emissions at runtime. It allows users to re-grid, combine, overwrite, subset, and scale emissions from different inventories through a configuration file and with no change to the model source code. The configuration file also maps emissions to model species with appropriate units. HEMCO complies with the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) for portability across models. We present here a new version HEMCO 3.0 that features an improved three-layer architecture to facilitate implementation into any atmospheric model, and improved capability for calculating emissions at any model resolution including multiscale and unstructured grids. The three-layer architecture of HEMCO 3.0 includes (1) a Data Input Layer that reads the configuration file and accesses the HEMCO library of emission inventories and other environmental data; (2) the HEMCO Core that computes emissions on the user-selected HEMCO grid; and (3) the Model Interface Layer that re-grids (if needed) and serves the data to the atmospheric model, and also serves model data to the HEMCO Core for computing emissions dependent on model state (such as from dust, vegetation, etc.). The HEMCO Core is common to the implementation in all models, while the Data Input Layer and the Model Interface Layer are adaptable to the model environment. Default versions of the Data Input Layer and Model Interface Layer enable straightforward implementation of HEMCO in any simple model architecture, and options are available to disable features such as re-gridding that may be done by independent couplers in more complex architectures. The HEMCO library of emission inventories and algorithms is continuously enriched through user contributions, so that new inventories can be immediately shared across models. HEMCO can also serve as a general data broker for models to process input data not only for emissions but for any gridded environmental datasets. We describe existing implementations of HEMCO 3.0 in (1) the GEOS-Chem “Classic” chemical transport model with shared-memory infrastructure, (2) the high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP) model with distributed-memory architecture, (3) the NASA GEOS Earth System Model (GEOS ESM), (4) the Weather Research and Forecasting model with GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC), (5) the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), and (6) the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecast System – Aerosols (GEFS-Aerosols), and the planned implementation in the NOAA Unified Forecast System (UFS). Implementation of HEMCO in the CESM2 model contributes to the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA) by providing a common emissions infrastructure to support different simulations of atmospheric chemistry across scales.

scholarly journals Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 5487-5506
Author(s):  
Haipeng Lin ◽  
Daniel J. Jacob ◽  
Elizabeth W. Lundgren ◽  
Melissa P. Sulprizio ◽  
Christoph A. Keller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Interface Layer ◽  
Configuration File ◽  
System Model ◽  
Emission Inventories ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Data Input ◽  
Input Layer ◽  
Three Layer Architecture

Abstract. Emissions are a central component of atmospheric chemistry models. The Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) is a software component for computing emissions from a user-selected ensemble of emission inventories and algorithms. It allows users to re-grid, combine, overwrite, subset, and scale emissions from different inventories through a configuration file and with no change to the model source code. The configuration file also maps emissions to model species with appropriate units. HEMCO can operate in offline stand-alone mode, but more importantly it provides an online facility for models to compute emissions at runtime. HEMCO complies with the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) for portability across models. We present a new version here, HEMCO 3.0, that features an improved three-layer architecture to facilitate implementation into any atmospheric model and improved capability for calculating emissions at any model resolution including multiscale and unstructured grids. The three-layer architecture of HEMCO 3.0 includes (1) the Data Input Layer that reads the configuration file and accesses the HEMCO library of emission inventories and other environmental data, (2) the HEMCO Core that computes emissions on the user-selected HEMCO grid, and (3) the Model Interface Layer that re-grids (if needed) and serves the data to the atmospheric model and also serves model data to the HEMCO Core for computing emissions dependent on model state (such as from dust or vegetation). The HEMCO Core is common to the implementation in all models, while the Data Input Layer and the Model Interface Layer are adaptable to the model environment. Default versions of the Data Input Layer and Model Interface Layer enable straightforward implementation of HEMCO in any simple model architecture, and options are available to disable features such as re-gridding that may be done by independent couplers in more complex architectures. The HEMCO library of emission inventories and algorithms is continuously enriched through user contributions so that new inventories can be immediately shared across models. HEMCO can also serve as a general data broker for models to process input data not only for emissions but for any gridded environmental datasets. We describe existing implementations of HEMCO 3.0 in (1) the GEOS-Chem “Classic” chemical transport model with shared-memory infrastructure, (2) the high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP) model with distributed-memory architecture, (3) the NASA GEOS Earth System Model (GEOS ESM), (4) the Weather Research and Forecasting model with GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC), (5) the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), and (6) the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecast System – Aerosols (GEFS-Aerosols), as well as the planned implementation in the NOAA Unified Forecast System (UFS). Implementation of HEMCO in CESM2 contributes to the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICA) by providing a common emissions infrastructure to support different simulations of atmospheric chemistry across scales.

scholarly journals Implementation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM) version 1.2.1 as a new base model into version 2.50 of the MESSy framework

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. G. Baumgaertner ◽  
P. Jöckel ◽  
A. Kerkweg ◽  
R. Sander ◽  
H. Tost
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
The United States ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Spectral Transform ◽  
Community Earth System Model ◽  
Component Models

Abstract. The Community Earth System Model (CESM1), maintained by the United States National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) is connected with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy). For the MESSy user community, this offers many new possibilities. The option to use the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) atmospheric dynamical cores, especially the state-of-the-art spectral element (SE) core, as an alternative to the ECHAM5 spectral transform dynamical core will provide scientific and computational advances for atmospheric chemistry and climate modelling with MESSy. The well-established finite volume core from CESM1(CAM) is also made available. This offers the possibility to compare three different atmospheric dynamical cores within MESSy. Additionally, the CESM1 land, river, sea ice, glaciers and ocean component models can be used in CESM1/MESSy simulations, allowing the use of MESSy as a comprehensive Earth system model (ESM). For CESM1/MESSy set-ups, the MESSy process and diagnostic submodels for atmospheric physics and chemistry are used together with one of the CESM1(CAM) dynamical cores; the generic (infrastructure) submodels support the atmospheric model component. The other CESM1 component models, as well as the coupling between them, use the original CESM1 infrastructure code and libraries; moreover, in future developments these can also be replaced by the MESSy framework. Here, we describe the structure and capabilities of CESM1/MESSy, document the code changes in CESM1 and MESSy, and introduce several simulations as example applications of the system. The Supplements provide further comparisons with the ECHAM5/MESSy atmospheric chemistry (EMAC) model and document the technical aspects of the connection in detail.

scholarly journals CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-F. Lamarque ◽  
L. K. Emmons ◽  
P. G. Hess ◽  
D. E. Kinnison ◽  
S. Tilmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Surface Ozone ◽  
The United States ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Ozone Production ◽  
Positive Bias ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Community Earth System Model

Abstract. We discuss and evaluate the representation of atmospheric chemistry in the global Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) version 4, the atmospheric component of the Community Earth System Model (CESM). We present a variety of configurations for the representation of tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, wet removal, and online and offline meteorology. Results from simulations illustrating these configurations are compared with surface, aircraft and satellite observations. Major biases include a negative bias in the high-latitude CO distribution, a positive bias in upper-tropospheric/lower-stratospheric ozone, and a positive bias in summertime surface ozone (over the United States and Europe). The tropospheric net chemical ozone production varies significantly between configurations, partly related to variations in stratosphere-troposphere exchange. Aerosol optical depth tends to be underestimated over most regions, while comparison with aerosol surface measurements over the United States indicate reasonable results for sulfate , especially in the online simulation. Other aerosol species exhibit significant biases. Overall, the model-data comparison indicates that the offline simulation driven by GEOS5 meteorological analyses provides the best simulation, possibly due in part to the increased vertical resolution (52 levels instead of 26 for online dynamics). The CAM-chem code as described in this paper, along with all the necessary datasets needed to perform the simulations described here, are available for download at www.cesm.ucar.edu.

scholarly journals Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1.2)

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 8875-8940 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tilmes ◽  
J.-F. Lamarque ◽  
L. K. Emmons ◽  
D. E. Kinnison ◽  
P.-L. Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
Tropospheric Chemistry ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Chemical Production ◽  
Area Density ◽  
Community Earth System Model ◽  
The Difference

Abstract. The Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), version 5, is now coupled to extensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, called CAM5-chem, and is available in addition to CAM4-chem in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) version 1.2. Both configurations are well suited as tools for atmospheric-chemistry modeling studies in the troposphere and lower stratosphere, whether with internally derived "free running" (FR) meteorology, or "specified dynamics" (SD). The main focus of this paper is to compare the performance of these configurations against observations from surface, aircraft, and satellite, as well as understand the origin of the identified differences. We particularly focus on comparing present-day methane lifetime estimates within the different model configurations, which range between 7.8 years in the SD configuration of CAM5-chem and 8.8 years in the FR configuration of CAM4-chem. We find that tropospheric surface area density is an important factor in controlling the burden of the hydroxyl radical (OH), which causes differences in tropical methane lifetime of about half a year between CAM4-chem and CAM5-chem. In addition, different distributions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) produced from lightning production explain about half of the difference between SD and FR model versions in both CAM4-chem and CAM5-chem. Remaining differences in the tropical OH burden are due to enhanced tropical ozone burden in SD configurations compared to the FR versions, which are not only caused by differences in chemical production or loss, but also by transport and mixing. For future studies, we recommend the use of CAM5-chem, due to improved aerosol description and inclusion of aerosol-cloud interactions. However, smaller tropospheric surface area density in the current version of CAM5-chem compared to CAM4-chem results in larger oxidizing capacity in the troposphere and therefore a shorter methane lifetime.

scholarly journals Representation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) CAM4-chem within the Chemistry-ClimateModel Initiative (CCMI)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tilmes ◽  
J.-F. Lamarque ◽  
L. K. Emmons ◽  
D. E. Kinnison ◽  
D. Marsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Surface Ozone ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Good Representation ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Community Earth System Model

Abstract. The Community Earth System Model, CESM1 CAM4-chem has been used to perform the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) reference and sensitivity simulations. In this model, the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4) is fully coupled to tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry. Details and specifics of each configuration, including new developments and improvements are described. CESM1 CAM4-chem is a low top model that reaches up to approximately 40 km and uses a horizontal resolution of 1.9° latitude and 2.5° longitude. For the specified dynamics experiments, the model is nudged to Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis For Research And Applications (MERRA) reanalysis. We summarize the performance of the three reference simulations suggested by CCMI, with a focus on the observed period. Comparisons with elected datasets are employed to demonstrate the general performance of the model. We highlight new datasets that are suited for multi-model evaluation studies. Most important improvements of the model are the treatment of stratospheric aerosols and the corresponding adjustments for radiation and optics, the updated chemistry scheme including improved polar chemistry and stratospheric dynamics, and improved dry deposition rates. These updates lead to a very good representation of tropospheric ozone within 20 % of values from available observations for most regions. In particular, the trend and magnitude of surface ozone has been much improved compared to earlier versions of the model. Furthermore, stratospheric column ozone of the Southern Hemisphere in winter and spring is reasonably well represented. All experiments still underestimate CO most significantly in Northern Hemisphere spring and show a significant underestimation of hydrocarbons based on surface observations.

New applications for an EMIC coupled to an atmospheric chemistry model - The University of Victoria Earth system climate model version 2.10 + FAIR chemistry module

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. MacIsaac ◽  
Nadine Mengis ◽  
Kirsten Zickfeld ◽  
Claude-Michel Nzotungicimpaye
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Cycle ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Climate Change Scenarios ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Desktop Computer ◽  
The University ◽  
Chemistry Module

<p>As an Earth system model of intermediate complexity (EMIC), the University of Victoria Earth system climate model (UVic-ESCM) has a comparably low computational cost (4.5–11.5 h per 100 years on a simple desktop computer). It is therefore a well-suited tool to perform experiments that are not yet computationally feasible in a state-of-the-art Earth system model. For example, the UVic-ESCM can be used to perform large perturbed parameter ensembles to constrain uncertainties, but also run a multitude of scenarios while at the same time simulating a well resolved carbon cycle. Thanks to its representation of many important components of the carbon cycle and the physical climate and its ability to simulate dynamic interactions between them, the UVic-ESCM is additionally a more comprehensive tool for process level uncertainty assessment compared to integrated assessment models (IAMs).</p><p>The coupling of this EMIC with an atmospheric chemistry module based on the FAIR simple climate model, now allows to directly implement GHG emission files as an input to the model, which makes it a valuable tool for many ‘what-if’ questions about climate turnaround times. Especially in the context of assessing the carbon cycle responses to future long-term climate change scenarios including e.g. marine CDR or terrestrial CDR implementations. In this presentation we will introduce this new model setup and show examples of first applications of this novel tool, while showcasing the advantages that it brings about. </p>

Coupling interactive fire with atmospheric composition and climate in the UK Earth System Model (UKESM)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Teixeira ◽  
Fiona O'Connor ◽  
Nadine Unger ◽  
Apostolos Voulgarakis
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Prescribed Fire ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Fire Emissions ◽  
The Uk

<p>Fires constitutes a key process in the Earth system (ES), being driven by climate as well as affecting the climate by changing atmospheric composition and its impact on the terrestrial carbon cycle. However, global modelling studies on the effects of fires on atmospheric composition, radiative forcing and climate have been very limited to date. The aim of this work is the development and application of a fully coupled vegetation-fire-chemistry-climate ES model in order to quantify the impacts of fire variability on atmospheric composition-climate interactions in the present day. For this, the INFERNO fire model is coupled to the atmosphere-only configuration of the UK’s Earth System Model (UKESM). This fire-atmosphere interaction through atmospheric chemistry and aerosols allows for fire emissions to feedback on radiation and clouds changing weather which can consequently feedback on the atmospheric drivers of fire. Additionally, INFERNO was updated based on recent developments in the literature to improve the representation of human/economic factors in the anthropogenic ignition and suppression of fire. This work presents an assessment of the effects of interactive fire coupling on atmospheric composition and climate compared to the standard UKESM1 configuration which has prescribed fire emissions. Results show a satisfactory performance when using the fire-atmosphere coupling (the “online” version of the model) when compared to the offline UKESM that uses prescribed fire. The model can reproduce observed present day global fire emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and aerosols, despite underestimating the global average burnt area. However, at a regional scale there is an overestimation of fire emissions over Africa due to the miss-representation of the underlying vegetation types and an underestimation over Equatorial Asia due to a lack of representation of peat fires.</p>

scholarly journals Aviation 2006 NO<sub>x</sub>-induced effects on atmospheric ozone and HO<sub>x</sub> in Community Earth System Model (CESM)

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 9925-9939 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Khodayari ◽  
S. Tilmes ◽  
S. C. Olsen ◽  
D. B. Phoenix ◽  
D. J. Wuebbles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Photochemical Reactions ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
System Model ◽  
Nox Emissions ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Community Earth System Model ◽  
Aerosol Module

Abstract. The interaction between atmospheric chemistry and ozone (O3) in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS) presents a major uncertainty in understanding the effects of aviation on climate. In this study, two configurations of the atmospheric model from the Community Earth System Model (CESM), Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry, Version 4 (CAM4) and Version 5 (CAM5), are used to evaluate the effects of aircraft nitrogen oxide (NOx = NO + NO2) emissions on ozone and the background chemistry in the UTLS. CAM4 and CAM5 simulations were both performed with extensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry including 133 species and 330 photochemical reactions. CAM5 includes direct and indirect aerosol effects on clouds using a modal aerosol module (MAM), whereby CAM4 uses a bulk aerosol module, which can only simulate the direct effect. To examine the accuracy of the aviation NOx-induced ozone distribution in the two models, results from the CAM5 and CAM4 simulations are compared to ozonesonde data. Aviation NOx emissions for 2006 were obtained from the AEDT (Aviation Environmental Design Tool) global commercial aircraft emissions inventory. Differences between simulated O3 concentrations and ozonesonde measurements averaged at representative levels in the troposphere and different regions are 13% in CAM5 and 18% in CAM4. Results show a localized increase in aviation-induced O3 concentrations at aviation cruise altitudes that stretches from 40° N to the North Pole. The results indicate a greater and more disperse production of aviation NOx-induced ozone in CAM5, with the annual tropospheric mean O3 perturbation of 1.2 ppb (2.4%) for CAM5 and 1.0 ppb (1.9%) for CAM4. The annual mean O3 perturbation peaks at about 8.2 ppb (6.4%) and 8.8 ppb (5.2%) in CAM5 and CAM4, respectively. Aviation emissions also result in increased hydroxyl radical (OH) concentrations and methane (CH4) loss rates, reducing the tropospheric methane lifetime in CAM5 and CAM4 by 1.69 and 1.40%, respectively. Aviation NOx emissions are associated with an instantaneous change in global mean short-term O3 radiative forcing (RF) of 40.3 and 36.5 mWm−2 in CAM5 and CAM4, respectively.

scholarly journals Modeling the interinfluence of fertilizer-induced NH<sub>3</sub> emission, nitrogen deposition, and aerosol radiative effects using modified CESM2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka Ming Fung ◽  
Maria Val Martin ◽  
Amos P. K. Tai
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Deposition ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Community Land Model ◽  
Model Version ◽  
Nh3 Emission ◽  
Aerosol Radiative

Abstract. Global ammonia (NH3) emission is expected to continue to rise due to intensified fertilization for growing food to satisfy the increasing demand worldwide. Previous studies focused mainly on estimating the land-to-atmosphere NH3 injection but seldom addressed the other side of the bidirectional nitrogen exchange – deposition. Ignoring this significant input source of soil mineral nitrogen may lead to an underestimation of NH3 emissions from natural sources. Here, we used an Earth system model to quantify NH3-induced changes in atmospheric composition and the consequent impacts on the Earth's radiative budget and biosphere, as well as the impacts of deposition on NH3 emissions from the land surface. We implemented a new scheme into the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) of the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) to estimate the volatilization of ammonium salt (NH4+) associated with synthetical fertilizers into gaseous NH3. We further parameterized the amount of emitted NH3 captured in the plant canopy to derive a more accurate quantity of NH3 that escapes to the atmosphere. Our modified CLM5 estimated that 11 Tg-N yr−1 of global NH3 emission is attributable to synthetic fertilizers. Interactively coupling terrestrial NH3 emissions to atmospheric chemistry simulations by the Community Atmospheric Model version 4 with chemistry (CAM4-chem), we found that such emissions favor the formation and deposition of NH4+ aerosol, which in turn disrupts the aerosol radiative effect and enhances soil NH3 volatilization in regions downwind of fertilized croplands. Our fully-coupled simulations showed that global-total NH3 emission is enhanced by nitrogen deposition by 2.4 Tg-N yr−1, when compared to the baseline case with 2000-level fertilization but without deposition- induced enhancements. In synergy with observations and emission inventories, our work provides a useful tool for stakeholders to evaluate the intertwined relations between agricultural trends, fertilize use, NH3 emission, atmospheric aerosols, and climate, so as to derive optimal strategies for securing both food production and environmental sustainability.

scholarly journals Using radar observations to evaluate 3-D radar echo structure simulated by the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) version 1

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 719-734
Author(s):  
Jingyu Wang ◽  
Jiwen Fan ◽  
Robert A. Houze Jr. ◽  
Stella R. Brodzik ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Radar Observations

Abstract. The Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) developed by the Department of Energy has a goal of addressing challenges in understanding the global water cycle. Success depends on correct simulation of cloud and precipitation elements. However, lack of appropriate evaluation metrics has hindered the accurate representation of these elements in general circulation models. We derive metrics from the three-dimensional data of the ground-based Next-Generation Radar (NEXRAD) network over the US to evaluate both horizontal and vertical structures of precipitation elements. We coarsened the resolution of the radar observations to be consistent with the model resolution and improved the coupling of the Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project Observation Simulator Package (COSP) and E3SM Atmospheric Model Version 1 (EAMv1) to obtain the best possible model output for comparison with the observations. Three warm seasons (2014–2016) of EAMv1 simulations of 3-D radar reflectivity features at an hourly scale are evaluated. A general agreement in domain-mean radar reflectivity intensity is found between EAMv1 and NEXRAD below 4 km altitude; however, the model underestimates reflectivity over the central US, which suggests that the model does not capture the mesoscale convective systems that produce much of the precipitation in that region. The shape of the model-estimated histogram of subgrid-scale reflectivity is improved by correcting the microphysical assumptions in COSP. Different from previous studies that evaluated modeled cloud top height, we find the model severely underestimates radar reflectivity at upper levels – the simulated echo top height is about 5 km lower than in observations – and this result is not changed by tuning any single physics parameter. For more accurate model evaluation, a higher-order consistency between the COSP and the host model is warranted in future studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document