scholarly journals Combined used of a conceptual model and a data-driven approach to evaluate the impact of land use/management scenarios on sediment discharge in a karstic catchment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anonymous
Tábula ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Ángel Amutio Gómez

La orientación al dato en el contexto de la transformación digital lleva aparejada la aparición de nuevas regulaciones, dinámicas de gobernanza y roles, y servicios, junto con las correspondientes prácticas, instrumentos y estándares. A la vez se suscitan retos en relación con la ciberseguridad y la preservación de los datos. En este artículo se exponen la transformación digital y la orientación al dato, la proyección de lo anterior en la administración digital, el contexto de la Unión Europea, trayectoria y su orientación, aspectos de la interoperabilidad, ciberseguridad y preservación de los datos, cuestiones de gobernanza y roles en la orientación al dato y, finalmente, unas conclusiones. The data-driven approach in the context of digital transformation entails the appearance of new regulations, governance dynamics and roles, and services, together with the corresponding practices, instruments and standards. At the same time new challenges appear in relation to cybersecurity and data preservation. This article presents the digital transformation and data-driven approach, the impact in digital administration, the context of the European Union, trajectory and orientation towards the future, along with aspects of interoperability, cybersecurity and data preservation, as well as issues of governance and roles in data orientation and finally some conclusions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 509 ◽  
pp. 354-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenio Molina-Navarro ◽  
Dennis Trolle ◽  
Silvia Martínez-Pérez ◽  
Antonio Sastre-Merlín ◽  
Erik Jeppesen

CICTP 2020 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Li ◽  
Haobin Jiang ◽  
Peng Jing ◽  
Yue Yu ◽  
Mengmeng Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Pettit ◽  
Sharon Biermann ◽  
Claudia Pelizaro ◽  
Ashley Bakelmun

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Amir Bahador Parsa ◽  
Ramin Shabanpour ◽  
Abolfazl (Kouros) Mohammadian ◽  
Joshua Auld ◽  
Thomas Stephens

Author(s):  
Jan Paul Lindner ◽  
Ulrike Eberle ◽  
Eva Knuepffer ◽  
Carla R. V. Coelho

Abstract Purpose The impact of land use on biodiversity is a topic that has received considerable attention in life cycle assessment (LCA). The methodology to assess biodiversity in LCA has been improved in the past decades. This paper contributes to this progress by building on the concept of conditions for maintained biodiversity. It describes the theory for the development of mathematical functions representing the impact of land uses and management practices on biodiversity. Methods The method proposed here describes the impact of land use on biodiversity as a decrease in biodiversity potential, capturing the impact of management practices. The method can be applied with weighting between regions, such as ecoregions. The biodiversity potential is calculated through functions that describe not only parameters which are relevant to biodiversity, for example, deadwood in a forest, but also the relationships between those parameters. For example, maximum biodiversity would hypothetically occur when the nutrient balance is ideal and no pesticide is applied. As these relationships may not be readily quantified, we propose the use of fuzzy thinking for biodiversity assessment, using AND/OR operators. The method allows the inclusion of context parameters that represent neither the management nor the land use practice being investigated, but are nevertheless relevant to biodiversity. The parameters and relationships can be defined by either literature or expert interviews. We give recommendations on how to create the biodiversity potential functions by providing the reader with a set of questions that can help build the functions and find the relationship between parameters. Results and discussion We present a simplified case study of paper production in the Scandinavian and Russian Taiga to demonstrate the applicability of the method. We apply the method to two scenarios, one representing an intensive forestry practice, and another representing lower intensity forestry management. The results communicate the differences between the two scenarios quantitatively, but more importantly, are able to provide guidance on improved management. We discuss the advantages of this condition-based approach compared to pre-defined intensity classes. The potential drawbacks of defining potential functions from industry-derived studies are pointed out. This method also provides a less strict approach to a reference situation, consequently allowing the adequate assessment of cases in which the most beneficial biodiversity state is achieved through management practices. Conclusions The originality of using fuzzy thinking is that it enables land use management practices to be accounted for in LCA without requiring sub-categories for different intensities to be explicitly established, thus moving beyond the classification of land use practices. The proposed method is another LCIA step toward closing the gap between land use management practices and biodiversity conservation goals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document