scholarly journals Characterizing severe weather potential in synoptically weakly forced thunderstorm environments

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1261-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Miller ◽  
Thomas L. Mote

Abstract. Weakly forced thunderstorms (WFTs), short-lived convection forming in synoptically quiescent regimes, are a contemporary forecasting challenge. The convective environments that support severe WFTs are often similar to those that yield only non-severe WFTs and, additionally, only a small proportion of individual WFTs will ultimately produce severe weather. The purpose of this study is to better characterize the relative severe weather potential in these settings as a function of the convective environment. Thirty-one near-storm convective parameters for > 200 000 WFTs in the Southeastern United States are calculated from a high-resolution numerical forecasting model, the Rapid Refresh (RAP). For each parameter, the relative odds of WFT days with at least one severe weather event is assessed along a moving threshold. Parameters (and the values of them) that reliably separate severe-weather-supporting from non-severe WFT days are highlighted. Only two convective parameters, vertical totals (VTs) and total totals (TTs), appreciably differentiate severe-wind-supporting and severe-hail-supporting days from non-severe WFT days. When VTs exceeded values between 24.6 and 25.1 ∘C or TTs between 46.5 and 47.3 ∘C, odds of severe-wind days were roughly 5× greater. Meanwhile, odds of severe-hail days became roughly 10× greater when VTs exceeded 24.4–26.0 ∘C or TTs exceeded 46.3–49.2 ∘C. The stronger performance of VT and TT is partly attributed to the more accurate representation of these parameters in the numerical model. Under-reporting of severe weather and model error are posited to exacerbate the forecasting challenge by obscuring the subtle convective environmental differences enhancing storm severity.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Miller ◽  
Thomas L. Mote

Abstract. Weakly forced thunderstorms (WFTs), short-lived convection forming in synoptically quiescent regimes, are a contemporary forecasting challenge. The convective environments that support severe WFTs are often similar to those that yield only nonsevere WFTs, and additionally, only a small proportion individual WFTs will ultimately produce severe weather. The purpose of this study is to better characterize the relative severe weather potential in these settings as a function of the convective environment. Thirty near-storm convective parameters for > 200 000 WFTs in the Southeast United States are calculated from a high-resolution numerical forecasting model, the Rapid Refresh (RAP). For each parameter, the relative likelihood of WFT days with at least one severe weather event is assessed along a moving threshold. Parameters (and the values of them) that reliably separate severe-weather-supporting from nonsevere WFT days are highlighted. Only two convective parameters, vertical totals (VT) and total totals (TT), appreciably differentiate severe-wind-supporting and severe-hail-supporting days from nonsevere WFT days. When VTs exceeded values between 24.6–25.1 °C or TTs between 46.5–47.3 °C, severe-wind days were roughly 5 × more likely. Meanwhile, severe-hail days became roughly 10 × more likely when VTs exceeded 24.4–26.0 °C or TTs exceeded 46.3–49.2 °C. The stronger performance of VT and TT is partly attributed to the more accurate representation of these parameters in the numerical model. Under-reporting of severe weather and model error are posited to exacerbate the forecasting challenge by obscuring the subtle convective environmental differences enhancing storm severity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Webster ◽  
Michael Uddstrom ◽  
Hilary Oliver ◽  
Simon Vosper

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Doswell ◽  
Harold E. Brooks ◽  
Michael P. Kay

Abstract The probability of nontornadic severe weather event reports near any location in the United States for any day of the year has been estimated. Gaussian smoothers in space and time have been applied to the observed record of severe thunderstorm occurrence from 1980 to 1994 to produce daily maps and annual cycles at any point. Many aspects of this climatology have been identified in previous work, but the method allows for the consideration of the record in several new ways. A review of the raw data, broken down in various ways, reveals that numerous nonmeteorological artifacts are present in the raw data. These are predominantly associated with the marginal nontornadic severe thunderstorm events, including an enormous growth in the number of severe weather reports since the mid-1950s. Much of this growth may be associated with a drive to improve warning verification scores. The smoothed spatial and temporal distributions of the probability of nontornadic severe thunderstorm events are presented in several ways. The distribution of significant nontornadic severe thunderstorm reports (wind speeds ≥ 65 kt and/or hailstone diameters ≥ 2 in.) is consistent with the hypothesis that supercells are responsible for the majority of such reports.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Case ◽  
Sujay V. Kumar ◽  
Jayanthi Srikishen ◽  
Gary J. Jedlovec

Abstract It is hypothesized that high-resolution, accurate representations of surface properties such as soil moisture and sea surface temperature are necessary to improve simulations of summertime pulse-type convective precipitation in high-resolution models. This paper presents model verification results of a case study period from June to August 2008 over the southeastern United States using the Weather Research and Forecasting numerical weather prediction model. Experimental simulations initialized with high-resolution land surface fields from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Land Information System (LIS) and sea surface temperatures (SSTs) derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) are compared to a set of control simulations initialized with interpolated fields from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction’s (NCEP) 12-km North American Mesoscale model. The LIS land surface and MODIS SSTs provide a more detailed surface initialization at a resolution comparable to the 4-km model grid spacing. Soil moisture from the LIS spinup run is shown to respond better to the extreme rainfall of Tropical Storm Fay in August 2008 over the Florida peninsula. The LIS has slightly lower errors and higher anomaly correlations in the top soil layer but exhibits a stronger dry bias in the root zone. The model sensitivity to the alternative surface initial conditions is examined for a sample case, showing that the LIS–MODIS data substantially impact surface and boundary layer properties. The Developmental Testbed Center’s Meteorological Evaluation Tools package is employed to produce verification statistics, including traditional gridded precipitation verification and output statistics from the Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) tool. The LIS–MODIS initialization is found to produce small improvements in the skill scores of 1-h accumulated precipitation during the forecast hours of the peak diurnal convective cycle. Because there is very little union in time and space between the forecast and observed precipitation systems, results from the MODE object verification are examined to relax the stringency of traditional gridpoint precipitation verification. The MODE results indicate that the LIS–MODIS-initialized model runs increase the 10 mm h−1 matched object areas (“hits”) while simultaneously decreasing the unmatched object areas (“misses” plus “false alarms”) during most of the peak convective forecast hours, with statistically significant improvements of up to 5%. Simulated 1-h precipitation objects in the LIS–MODIS runs more closely resemble the observed objects, particularly at higher accumulation thresholds. Despite the small improvements, however, the overall low verification scores indicate that much uncertainty still exists in simulating the processes responsible for airmass-type convective precipitation systems in convection-allowing models.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Simon A. Louis

This paper documents the case of a nocturnal outbreak of tornadoes on the New South Wales (NSW) south coast on 23 February 2013, and provides an analysis of the conditions that led to the outbreak. These tornadoes were associated with the passage of a warm front which had developed on the eastern flank of a mature extratropical cyclone.The damage from the tornadoes is discussed, and an analysis of the synoptic and mesoscale conditions that led to the event is provided. An analysis of radar at the time of the event shows a series of vortices developing within a zone of horizontal shear just prior to the tornadoes developing. The tornadoes were difficult for operational forecasters to predict, partly due to the infrequent occurrence of nocturnal tornadoes of this type in NSW, and in part due to operational demands from the broader scale severe weather event that resulted from the low-pressure system. This paper presents an analysis of the event that may assist forecasters in identifying similar events in the future.


1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Achtemeier ◽  
James T. Paul

Abstract We are developing a numerical wind model to simulate airflow near the ground at night over terrain typical of the Piedmont of the southeastern United States. The purpose is to improve understanding of night winds and provide more accurate prediction of smoke movement when wind speed is low and wind direction is highly variable. These conditions often prevail when fog or a combination of smoke and fog produce low visibility. The model was tested with a weather event that produced local dense fog implicated as a factor in a highway accident. The model provides insight into drainage winds and valley flows and hence promises to be useful for predicting smoke movement at night. South. J. Appl. For. 18(2):60-64.


Tellus B ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-1006
Author(s):  
W. Thomas ◽  
F. Baier ◽  
T. Erbertseder ◽  
M. Kaästner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document