scholarly journals Simple rules to minimize exposure to coseismic landslide hazard

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Milledge ◽  
Alexander L. Densmore ◽  
Dino Bellugi ◽  
Nick J. Rosser ◽  
Jack Watt ◽  
...  

Abstract. Landslides constitute a hazard to life and infrastructure, and their risk is mitigated primarily by reducing exposure. This requires information on landslide hazard at a scale that can enable informed decisions about how to respond to that hazard. Such information is often unavailable to, or not easily interpreted by, those who might need it most (e.g., householders, local government, and NGOs). To address this shortcoming, we develop simple rules to identify landslide hazard that are understandable, communicable, and memorable, and that require no prior knowledge, skills, or equipment to evaluate. We examine rules based on two common metrics of landslide hazard, local slope and upslope contributing area as a proxy for hillslope location, and we introduce and test two new metrics: the maximum angle to the skyline and the hazard area, defined as the upslope area with slope > 39° that reaches a location without passing over a slope of  10°) channels with many steep (> 39°) areas that are upslope. Because local slope alone is a skilful predictor of landslide hazard, we can formulate a third rule as minimise local slope, especially on steep slopes and even at the expense of increasing upslope contributing area, but not at the expense of increasing skyline angle or hazard area. Upslope contributing area, by contrast, has a weaker and more complex relationship to hazard than the other predictors. Our simple rules complement, but do not replace, detailed site-specific investigation; they can be used for initial estimation of landslide hazard or guide decision-making in the absence of any other information.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Milledge ◽  
Alexander L. Densmore ◽  
Dino Bellugi ◽  
Nick J. Rosser ◽  
Jack Watt ◽  
...  

Abstract. Landslides constitute a hazard to life and infrastructure and their risk is mitigated primarily by reducing exposure. This requires information on landslide hazard on a scale that can enable informed decisions. Such information is often unavailable to, or not easily interpreted by, those who might need it most (e.g. householders, local governments and non-governmental organisations). To address this shortcoming, we develop simple rules to minimise exposure to coseismic landslide hazard that are understandable, communicable and memorable, and that require no prior knowledge, skills or equipment to apply. We examine rules based on two common metrics of landslide hazard, (1) local slope and (2) upslope contributing area as a proxy for hillslope location relative to rivers or ridge crests. In addition, we introduce and test two new metrics: the maximum angle to the skyline and the hazard area, defined as the upslope area with slope >40∘ from which landslide debris can reach a location without passing over a slope of <10∘. We then test the skill with which each metric can identify landslide hazard – defined as the probability of being hit by a landslide – using inventories of landslides triggered by six earthquakes that occurred between 1993 and 2015. We find that the maximum skyline angle and hazard area provide the most skilful predictions, and these results form the basis for two simple rules: “minimise your maximum angle to the skyline” and “avoid steep (>10∘) channels with many steep (>40∘) areas that are upslope”. Because local slope alone is also a skilful predictor of landslide hazard, we can formulate a third rule as “minimise the angle of the slope under your feet, especially on steep hillsides, but not at the expense of increasing skyline angle or hazard area”. In contrast, the upslope contributing area has a weaker and more complex relationship to hazard than the other predictors. Our simple rules complement but do not replace detailed site-specific investigation: they can be used for initial estimations of landslide hazard or to guide decision-making in the absence of any other information.


Author(s):  
David G. Milledge ◽  
Alexander L. Densmore ◽  
Dino Bellugi ◽  
Nick J. Rosser ◽  
Jack Watt ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Saputra ◽  
Junun Sartohadi ◽  
Danang Sri Hadmoko ◽  
Christopher Gomez

Java, the most densely populated island in Indonesia, is located on top of the most seismically active areas in Southeast Asia: the Sunda Megathrust. This area is frequently hit by strong earthquake. More than 3,300 M>5earthquakesoccurred between 1973-2014. The wide range of mountainous areas and high intensity of rainfall, make several part of the island one of the most exposed regions for coseismic landslides such as Baturagung area, the Southeast mountainous area of Yogyakarta Province. An integrated method between RS and GIS was used to conduct the vulnerability assessment due to the lack of the site specific slope instability analysis and coseismic landslides data. The seismic zonation of Baturagung area was obtained based on the analysis of Kanai attenuation. The geologic information was extracted using remote sensing interpretation based on the 1:100,000 geologic map of Yogyakarta and geomorphologic map of Baturagung area as well. The coseismic landslide hazard assessment has been estimated using scoring analysis in the GIS platform proposed by Mora and Vahrson (1993) with several modification. The accomplished coseismic landslide hazard map shows medium hazard coverage in the eastern areas, in the upper slope of Baturagung area, which consists of Semilir Formation. The result provides a distinct description of coseismic landslides hazard distribution in Batuaragung area. However, it should only be the preliminary assessment of the site specific investigation especially on valuable area or asset. 


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 57-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cardinali ◽  
P. Reichenbach ◽  
F. Guzzetti ◽  
F. Ardizzone ◽  
G. Antonini ◽  
...  

Abstract. We present a geomorphological method to evaluate landslide hazard and risk. The method is based on the recognition of existing and past landslides, on the scrutiny of the local geological and morphological setting, and on the study of site-specific and historical information on past landslide events. For each study area a multi-temporal landslide inventory map has been prepared through the interpretation of various sets of stereoscopic aerial photographs taken over the period 1941–1999, field mapping carried out in the years 2000 and 2001, and the critical review of site-specific investigations completed to solve local instability problems. The multi-temporal landslide map portrays the distribution of the existing and past landslides and their observed changes over a period of about 60 years. Changes in the distribution and pattern of landslides allow one to infer the possible evolution of slopes, the most probable type of failures, and their expected frequency of occurrence and intensity. This information is used to evaluate landslide hazard, and to estimate the associated risk. The methodology is not straightforward and requires experienced geomorphologists, trained in the recognition and analysis of slope processes. Levels of landslide hazard and risk are expressed using an index that conveys, in a simple and compact format, information on the landslide frequency, the landslide intensity, and the likely damage caused by the expected failure. The methodology was tested in 79 towns, villages, and individual dwellings in the Umbria Region of central Italy.


Author(s):  
Sung Eun Cha ◽  
Chul Hee Lim ◽  
Ji Won Kim ◽  
Moon Il Kim ◽  
Chol Ho Song ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Hasmana Soewandita

Landslide is one of the high frequency disasters that occur in Indonesia. The incident recurs every year with a different location. The fact that landslide hazards are used intensively for agricultural cultivation due to economic considerations. One of the efforts to mitigate this disaster is the Bioenginering implementation approach. Bioenginering activity is the application of landslide hazard area management by managing plants / vegetation. The purpose of this research is to implement a vegetative technology implementation model as an effort to mitigate landslides. Bioenginering implementation is designed with a combination of ecological and socio-economic approaches. The results of this combination are consulted with the affected community and consider various vegetation alternatives. The selected vegetation not only has an ecological function but also an economic function. With these considerations, a vegetation design is obtained with a combination of upper strata (trees), middle and lower strata. For the upper strata it is recommended to plant Petai (Parkia speciosa) and Durian (Durio zibenthinus), for the middle strata, namely Coffee (Coffea arabica) and lower strata plants are pineapple (Ananas commocus). The combination of plants such as the implementation at the field level will be accepted by the farming community, because every certain period of time the farmers will be able to harvest their crops without having to remove the plants or cut down the plants. Maintaining the level of land cover and land use has implications for maintaining the stability of soil moisture conditions which in turn can reduce the threat of landslides in landslide hazard areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document