scholarly journals Technical note: A sensitivity analysis from 1 to 40 GHz for observing the Arctic Ocean with the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer

Ocean Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-461
Author(s):  
Lise Kilic ◽  
Catherine Prigent ◽  
Carlos Jimenez ◽  
Craig Donlon
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Radiative Transfer ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. The Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) is one of the high-priority missions for the expansion of the Copernicus program within the European Space Agency (ESA). It is designed to respond to the European Union Arctic policy. Its channels, incidence angle, precision, and spatial resolutions have been selected to observe the Arctic Ocean with the recommendations expressed by the user communities. In this note, we present the sensitivity analysis that has led to the choice of the CIMR channels. The famous figure from Wilheit (1979), describing the frequency sensitivity of passive microwave satellite observations to ocean parameters, has been extensively used for channel selection of microwave radiometer frequencies on board oceanic satellite missions. Here, we propose to update this sensitivity analysis, using state-of-the-art radiative transfer simulations for different geophysical conditions (Arctic, mid-latitude, tropics). We used the Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) from Meissner and Wentz (2012) for the ocean surface, the Round Robin Data Package of the ESA Climate Change Initiative (Pedersen et al., 2019) for the sea ice, and the RTM from Rosenkranz (2017) for the atmosphere. The sensitivities of the brightness temperatures (TBs) observed by CIMR as a function of sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity (SSS), sea ice concentration (SIC), ocean wind speed (OWS), total column water vapor (TCWV), and total column liquid water (TCLW) are presented as a function of frequency between 1 and 40 GHz. The analysis underlines the difficulty to reach the user requirements with single-channel retrieval, especially under cold ocean conditions. With simultaneous measurements between 1.4 and 36 GHz onboard CIMR, applying multi-channel algorithms will be facilitated, to provide the user community with the required ocean and ice information under arctic environments.

scholarly journals Technical note: A sensitivity analysis from 1 to 40 GHz for observing the Arctic Ocean with the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Kilic ◽  
Catherine Prigent ◽  
Carlos Jimenez ◽  
Craig Donlon
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Radiative Transfer ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. The Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) is one of the high priority missions for the expansion of the Copernicus program within the European Space Agency (ESA). It is designed to respond to the European Union Arctic policy. Its channels, incidence angle, precisions, and spatial resolutions have been selected to observe the Arctic Ocean with the recommendations expressed by the user communities. In this note, we present the sensitivity analysis that has led to the choice of the CIMR channels. The famous figure from Wilheit (1979), describing the frequency sensitivity of passive microwave satellite observations to ocean parameters, has been extensively used for channel selection of microwave radiometer frequencies on board oceanic satellite missions. Here, we propose to update this sensitivity analysis, using state-of-the-art radiative transfer simulations for different geophysical conditions (Arctic, mid-latitude, Tropics). We used the Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) from Meissner and Wentz (2012) for the ocean surface, the Round Robin Data Package of the ESA Climate Change Initiative (Pedersen et al., 2019) for the sea ice, and the RTM from Rosenkranz (2017) for the atmosphere. The sensitivities of the brightness temperatures (TBs) observed by CIMR as a function of Sea Surface Temperature (SST), Sea Surface Salinity (SSS), Sea Ice Concentration (SIC), Ocean Wind Speed (OWS), Total Column Water Vapor (TCWV), and Total Column Liquid Water (TCLW) are presented as a function of frequency between 1 to 40 GHz. The analysis underlines the difficulty to reach the user requirements with single channel retrieval, especially under cold ocean conditions. With simultaneous measurements between 1.4 and 36 GHz onboard CIMR, applying multi-channel algorithms will be facilitated, to provide the user community with the required ocean and ice information under arctic environments.

scholarly journals The effect of Arctic sea-ice extent on the absorbed (net) solar flux at the surface, based on ISCCP-D2 cloud data for 1983–2007

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 777-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Matsoukas ◽  
N. Hatzianastassiou ◽  
A. Fotiadi ◽  
K. G. Pavlakis ◽  
I. Vardavas
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Solar Flux ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. We estimate the effect of the Arctic sea ice on the absorbed (net) solar flux using a radiative transfer model. Ice and cloud input data to the model come from satellite observations, processed by the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) and span the period July 1983–June 2007. The sea-ice effect on the solar radiation fluctuates seasonally with the solar flux and decreases interannually in synchronisation with the decreasing sea-ice extent. A disappearance of the Arctic ice cap during the sunlit period of the year would radically reduce the local albedo and cause an annually averaged 19.7 W m−2 increase in absorbed solar flux at the Arctic Ocean surface, or equivalently an annually averaged 0.55 W m−2 increase on the planetary scale. In the clear-sky scenario these numbers increase to 34.9 and 0.97 W m−2, respectively. A meltdown only in September, with all other months unaffected, increases the Arctic annually averaged solar absorption by 0.32 W m−2. We examined the net solar flux trends for the Arctic Ocean and found that the areas absorbing the solar flux more rapidly are the North Chukchi and Kara Seas, Baffin and Hudson Bays, and Davis Strait. The sensitivity of the Arctic absorbed solar flux on sea-ice extent and cloud amount was assessed. Although sea ice and cloud affect jointly the solar flux, we found little evidence of strong non-linearities.

scholarly journals The interaction of ultraviolet light with Arctic sea ice during SHEBA

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald K. Perovich
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Heat Budget ◽  
Ice Cover ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Ultraviolet Irradiance

AbstractThe reflection, absorption and transmission of ultraviolet light by a sea-ice cover strongly impacts primary productivity, higher trophic components of the food web, and humans. Measurements of the incident irradiance at 305, 320, 340 and 380 nm and of the photosynthetically active radiation were made from April through September 1998 as part of the SHEBA (Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean program) field experiment in the Arctic Ocean. In addition, observations of snow depth and ice thickness were made at more than 100 sites encompassing a comprehensive range of conditions. The thickness observations were combined with a radiative transfer model to compute a time series of the ultraviolet light transmitted by the ice cover from April through September. Peak values of incident ultraviolet irradiance occurred in mid-June. Peak transmittance was later in the summer at the end of the melt season when the snow cover had completely melted, the ice had thinned and pond coverage was extensive. The fraction of the incident ultraviolet irradiance transmitted through the ice increased by several orders of magnitude as the melt season progressed. Ultraviolet transmittance was approximately a factor of ten greater for melt ponds than bare ice. Climate change has the potential to alter the amplitude and timing of the annual albedo cycle of sea ice. If the onset of melt occurs at increasingly earlier dates, ultraviolet transmittance will be significantly enhanced, with potentially deleterious biological impacts.

scholarly journals Mechanism of seasonal Arctic sea ice evolution and Arctic amplification

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2191-2202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Yul Kim ◽  
Benjamin D. Hamlington ◽  
Hanna Na ◽  
Jinju Kim
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Turbulent Heat Flux ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Turbulent Heat ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
Atmospheric Column ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. Sea ice loss is proposed as a primary reason for the Arctic amplification, although the physical mechanism of the Arctic amplification and its connection with sea ice melting is still in debate. In the present study, monthly ERA-Interim reanalysis data are analyzed via cyclostationary empirical orthogonal function analysis to understand the seasonal mechanism of sea ice loss in the Arctic Ocean and the Arctic amplification. While sea ice loss is widespread over much of the perimeter of the Arctic Ocean in summer, sea ice remains thin in winter only in the Barents–Kara seas. Excessive turbulent heat flux through the sea surface exposed to air due to sea ice reduction warms the atmospheric column. Warmer air increases the downward longwave radiation and subsequently surface air temperature, which facilitates sea surface remains to be free of ice. This positive feedback mechanism is not clearly observed in the Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas, since sea ice refreezes in late fall (November) before excessive turbulent heat flux is available for warming the atmospheric column in winter. A detailed seasonal heat budget is presented in order to understand specific differences between the Barents–Kara seas and Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas.

scholarly journals An Assessment of State-of-the-Art Mean Sea Surface and Geoid Models of the Arctic Ocean: Implications for Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 8593-8613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriette Skourup ◽  
Sinéad Louise Farrell ◽  
Stefan Hendricks ◽  
Robert Ricker ◽  
Thomas W. K. Armitage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Mean Sea Surface

scholarly journals Arctic sea-ice extent and its effect on the absorbed (net) solar flux at the surface, based on ISCCP-D2 cloud data for 1983–2007

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 21041-21072
Author(s):  
C. Matsoukas ◽  
N. Hatzianastassiou ◽  
A. Fotiadi ◽  
K. G. Pavlakis ◽  
I. Vardavas
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Solar Flux ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. We estimate the effect of the Arctic sea ice on the absorbed (net) solar flux using a radiation transfer model. Ice and cloud input data to the model come from satellite observations, processed by the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) and span the period July 1983–June 2007. The sea-ice effect on the solar radiation fluctuates seasonally with the solar flux and decreases interannually in synchronisation with the decreasing sea-ice extent. A disappearance of the Arctic ice cap during the sunlit period of the year would radically reduce the local albedo and cause a 19.7 W m−2 increase in absorbed solar flux at the Arctic Ocean surface, or equivalently a 0.55 W m−2 increase on the planetary scale. In the clear-sky scenario these numbers increase to 34.9 and 0.97 W m−2, respectively. A meltdown only in September, with all other months unaffected, increases the Arctic annually averaged solar absorption by 0.32 W m−2. We examined the net solar flux trends for the Arctic Ocean and found that the areas absorbing the solar flux more rapidly are the North Chukchi and Kara Seas, Buffin and Hudson Bays, and Davis Strait. The sensitivity of the Arctic absorbed solar flux on sea-ice extent and cloud amount was assessed. Although sea ice and cloud affect jointly the solar flux, we found little evidence of strong non-linearities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document