Ortaokul Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerine Göre Ortaöğretim Merkezi Sınavı (LGS)’nin Üstünlükleri ve Sınırlıkları

The purpose of this research is to present the advantages and limitations of the Secondary Education Center Exam (SECE) conducted in 2017-2018 academic year in the opinions of middle school teachers. The study group of the research was consisted of 47 middle school teachers those who entered lessons the 8th grades as of the data collection period in Mamak district. As research method, semi-structured interview model, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. As the data collection tool, structured interview form is applied. The data obtained from the interviews have been analyzed using the method of descriptive analysis. The findings obtained in the research are given below: 1- According to middle school teachers, the advantage of secondary education center exam as regards previous high school admission exams is high distinctiveness and limitation of SECE requires high-level skills. 2- The distinctiveness of successful/unsuccessful students of SECE is high when it comes to yes/no questions. However, it is not qualified to discern from students who is solving problems fast/practical and high level skilled. 3- In SECE, difficulty of skill-based questions is coherent with learning outcomes in secondary education curriculum. Nevertheless, they are not coherent with assessment of high-level behaviors, extent, content intelligibility and schoolbooks. 4- In SECE, assessment of basic skills stated and aimed to improve in secondary education curriculum is adequate. However, the aims in curriculum are not adequate to question high-level skills. 5- According to middle school teachers, student achievement was affected by the students mostly register the closest school to their home and there is no obligation to have an exam.