scholarly journals Existential Philosophy of History

rth | ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-57
Author(s):  
Bennett Gilbert ◽  
Natan Elgabsi

In this paper we delineate the conditions and features of what we call an existential philosophy of history in relation to customary trends in the field of the philosophy of history. We do this by circumscribing what a transgenerational temporality and what our entanglement in ethical relations with temporal others ask of us as existential and responsive selves and by explicating what attitude we need to have when trying to responsibly respond to other vulnerable beings in our historical world of life.

Author(s):  
José Carlos Bermejo

This is an essay on the book Dialéctica existencial y psicoanálisis, published in 1972. Its author, José Manuel López Nogueira, was a psychiatrist and philosopher who lived in Galicia (Spain) during the dictatorship of General Franco. In this book the author develops a systemic theory on the social and individual life, integrating with it knowledge from neurology, psychiatry, philosophy of history and existential philosophy. Published by a small publisher in a backward country, this book, with its complete and updated references in 1972, is an outstanding document for Spanish intellectual historyKey wordsPhilosophy, psychiatry, intellectual history, Spain under Franco.ResumenEl presente ensayo aborda el libro Dialéctica existencial y psicoanálisis, publicado en 1972. Su autor, José Manuel López Nogueira, fue un psiquiatra y filósofo que vivió en Galicia (España) durante la dictadura del General Franco. En este libro, el autor desarrolla una teoría global acerca de la vida social e individual, integrando los conocimientos de la neurología, la psiquiatría, la filosofía de la historia y la filosofía existencialista. Publicado por una pequeña editorial en un país culturalmente atrasado, este libro, con sus exhaustivas y actualizadas referencias en 1972, constituye un extraordinario documento para el estudio de la historia intelectual española.Palabras clave:filosofía, psiquiatría, historia intelectual, historia del franquismo.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 789-804
Author(s):  
Guillaume Fagniez

Abstract This paper examines the “critique of historical existence” as a main theme in Karl Löwith’s philosophical works and discusses its emergence, its exact meaning and its contemporary relevance. First, the study shows that Löwith’s critique of History stems from his preoccupation with the question of nihilism. He first discusses the question of “the world as such” in the 1920’s in the context of his anthropological project, and then again in the 1930’s as part of his interpretation of the work of Nietzsche. Secondly, a distinction is proposed between, on the one hand, Löwith’s investigation into the “theological background of the philosophy of history” and, on the other hand, his radical criticism of history as a “historical world”. Finally, the paper sheds light on the difficulties that challenge the project of overcoming the modern historical paradigm, and goes on to discuss the new relevance that Löwith’s philosophy could have today in order to think anew the relationship between nature and history.


Author(s):  
Sp. Sh. Aytov

This article is devoted to the analysis of the formation of the cognitive perspective of the historical-anthropological dimension of modern philosophy of history. The influence of the mentioned problem field on the development of intellectual directions of modern philosophical and historical studios was studied.


Author(s):  
Walter D. Mignolo

This book is an extended argument about the “coloniality” of power. In a shrinking world where sharp dichotomies, such as East/West and developing/developed, blur and shift, this book points to the inadequacy of current practices in the social sciences and area studies. It explores the crucial notion of “colonial difference” in the study of the modern colonial world and traces the emergence of an epistemic shift, which the book calls “border thinking.” Further, the book expands the horizons of those debates already under way in postcolonial studies of Asia and Africa by dwelling on the genealogy of thoughts of South/Central America, the Caribbean, and Latino/as in the United States. The book's concept of “border gnosis,” or sensing and knowing by dwelling in imperial/colonial borderlands, counters the tendency of occidentalist perspectives to manage, and thus limit, understanding. A new preface discusses this book as a dialogue with Hegel's Philosophy of History.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 79-94
Author(s):  
Ferdinand Fellmann

In this paper I claim that the metaphysical concept of culture has come to an end. Among the European authors Georg Simmel is the foremost who has deconstructed the myth of culture as a substantial totality beyond relations or prior to them. Two tenets of research have prepared the end of all-inclusive culture: First, Simmel’s formal access that considers society as the modality of interactions and relations between individuals, thus overcoming the social evolutionism of Auguste Comte; second, his critical exegesis of idealistic philosophy of history, thus leaving behind the Hegelian tradition. Although Simmel adheres in some statements to the out-dated idea of morphological unity, his sociological and epistemological thinking paved the way for the concept of social identity as a network of series connected loosely by contiguity. This type of connection is confirmed by the present feeling of life as individual self-invention according to changing situations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document