scholarly journals IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING BIOETIHICS IN MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS

1969 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
LIAQAT ALI

Medical ethics is merely one branch of general ethics,and it is precisely defined by professor Dunston as“ Obligations of moral nature which govern the practiceof medicine” 1 the morals are based either on religion,philosophy or socio culture traditions. The three basicmoral obligations in a doctor- patient relationship arebeneficence, patient autonomy and justice the practiceof medicine, in a board philosophical sense, is a searchfor the truth and all the ethical and moral principles areinbuilt and inseparable with in this search. Morepragmatically, Medicine is both and art and science.The aspect of science in medical is very easilyunderstood like making a measurable observation thatleads to hypothesis. The truth of hypothesis issubsequently validated by relevant observations andtests for significance. On the other hand the art in themedicine is an immeasurable quantum, whichaccording to Bertrand Russel is the art of rationalconjecture. It is very fascinating that the medicalprofessionals have been some of the best philosophersthough the history of mankind and they have explainedthe abstract theories of classical philosophy intopractical actions at bedside. The practice of medicinerequired education, knowledge and wisdom bom ofexperience. It has to be taught to the medical studentsand its ethical responsibility of a society to make surethat it’s actually done.

Author(s):  
Jue WANG

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.本文首先廓清了“醫乃仁術”在傳統儒家思想脈絡裏的含義,並指出從來源上說,它迥異於西方生命倫理學主流,而採取了一種獨特的“不離人倫,親親為本”的視角。然而這種視角使得“醫乃仁術”總是被一種歧義所困擾:它既是一種行善原則,也是一種未顧及自主性原則的行善原則,家長主義的陰影無處不在。“醫乃仁術”的歧義成為中國生命倫理學建設的最大瓶頸。面對這種困境,本文試圖在現代西方生命倫理學話語實踐之外,另闢蹊徑,借助關懷倫理學和美德倫理學的最近研究成果,闡發“醫乃仁術”的合理內涵。This essay addresses the ethical implications of the physician-patient relationship from the Confucian perspective, which holds that the physician must regard the patient as a family member to treat the patient properly. It is well known that there are two primary approaches to moral authority in contemporary Western medical ethics. One is internal, and assumes that the good inherent to medicine is the source of moral authority in medical activities. The other is external, and denies that the ends and ethics of medicine can be determined by typical medical activities. It holds that medical ethics should be based on general moral principles, such as autonomy and justice. However, the Confucian model seems to be at odds with both of these approaches. On the one hand, Confucians do not think that medicine constitutes a self-contained domain of activity with its own ethics; rather, medicine is seen as a continuum of familial relationships and ethics. On the other hand, Confucians also hold that the physician-patient relationship should follow the example of the flexible relationships among family members rather than the rigid general principles of autonomy and justice.The Western model is aimed at action, whereas the Confucian view focuses on personal affective relations. The greatest problem with the Confucian model is its notorious paternalism; that is, it appears to fail to pay sufficient attention to the potential conflict between patient and physician about the good, ignoring the issue of patient autonomy. In the modern Western tradition, the model of the physician-patient relationship is based on two self-sufficient agents (patient and physician) who are united in pursuing a certain good, where each is the final source of what is good for him- or herself. However, the real physician-patient encounter demands a deeper commitment between the two than this model suggests. When entering a physician-patient relationship, what the patient seeks is care from the physician, not autonomy. That is to say, the patient first of all trusts the physician. To earn that trust, it is not enough that the physician treat the patient based only on the principle of autonomy or what the patient requires. Rather, a deep attachment – analogous to a familial relationship – must be developed that can serve as the basis of the encounter between the patient and physician. The Confucian physician-patient model, which is rooted in such a relationship, does not contrast but rather complements its Western counterpart.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 564 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.


1993 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Paris

The issue of physician refusal of requested treatment has fueled a two-pronged debate in our society-one on the meaning of futility and the other on the limits of patient autonomy. The latter is a genuinely philosophic dispute; the former, it seems, is a modern relapse into nominalism.It is not the meaning of a word, but the moral basis for the actions of the par-ticipants that should be the focus of our attention, Yet the medical literature distracts us with articles titled “Medical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical Implica-tions” “The Problem with Futility” “Who Defines Futility?,” “The Illusion of Futility,” and even “Beyond Futility.”The history of the futility debate, which was launched by a 1983 study of Bedell and Delbanco that demonstrated the ineffectiveness of CPR for certain catego-ries of patients, has been documented elsewhere. Here we will inquire if the term, and its rapid intrusion into the medical lexicon, serves a useful purpose or if, as Truog suggested, we would all be better off if this new buzzword were jettisoned.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-323
Author(s):  
A. A. Anufriev

In the life of an individual scientific institution, as well as in the life of an entire society, there are certain periods, trends and trends are known, which, taken together, constitutes the history of this institution. These institutions, which have their own history, include university clinics. The history of these scientific and medical institutions usually has both bright and dark periods, depending not only on a purely scientific setting of the case, but often also on outsiders who have nothing in common with science that have no influence. Here, in a strictly scientific work, this is not the place to go into detail about such influences, but I would like to point out one of them as deserving special attention. This is the dependence of the clinic on city hospitals; it appears in the case when the University acquires one of the premises of city hospitals for clinical purposes. If the hospital business generally went hand in hand with the clinical one and pursued the same goals, then of course the interests of both that and the other institution would be completely identical and would not contradict one another.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1601-1610
Author(s):  
Anne Helene Mortensen ◽  
Marita Nordhaug ◽  
Vibeke Lohne

Nudging is a concept in behavioural science, political theory and economics that proposes indirect suggestions to try to achieve non-forced compliance and to influence the decision making and behaviour of groups and individuals. Researchers in medical ethics are currently discussing whether nudging is ethically permissible in healthcare. In this article, we examine current knowledge about how different decisions (rational and pre-rational decisions, major and minor decisions) are made and how this decision-making process pertains to patients. We view this knowledge in light of the nursing project and the ongoing debate regarding the ethical legitimacy of nudging in healthcare. We argue that it is insufficient to discuss nudging in nursing and healthcare in light of free will and patient autonomy alone. Sometimes, nurses must take charge and exhibit leadership in the nurse–patient relationship. From the perspective of nursing as leadership, nudging becomes a useful tool for directing and guiding patients towards the shared goals of health, recovery and independence and away from suffering. The use of nudging in nursing to influence patients’ decisions and actions must be in alignment with the nursing project and in accordance with patients’ own values and goals.


Author(s):  
C.Christopher Hook ◽  
Paul S. Mueller

Medicine is first and foremost a relationship. It is the coming together of one individual, the patient, who is ill or has specific needs and a second individual, the physician, whose goal is to help the patient and who possesses a unique set of knowledge and skills to pursue that goal. Because medicine is fundamentally a relationship, it is at heart an ethical endeavor. Indeed, the physician-patient relationship is a fiduciary relationship; physicians have knowledge, skills, and powers that patients do not have. In turn, patients-who are often sick and vulnerable-must trust that physicians act in their patients' best interests. As a result, physicians have a long and rich history of creating oaths and codes that provide ethical norms and frameworks to support and protect physician-patient relationships. Medical ethics consists of a set of principles and systematic methods that attempt to guide physicians on how they ought to act in their relationships with patients and others and how to resolve moral problems that arise in the care of patients.


Diogenes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelej Kondratjuk ◽  
◽  
◽  

Social Philosophy is a discipline that deals with social behaviour and interprets society and its institutions according to ethical values instead of empirical relations. Bearing this in mind, I decided to explore the phenomenon of the crisis regarding the modern ethos of postmodern culture in the context of the history of classical philosophy. I have done so by relating it to new theoretical and epistemological frameworks of social, philosophical ontology on the one hand, and to the attempt to find an appropriate linguistic paradigm though philosophical semantics on the other hand that would have the potential to create an alternative ethical category. The ultimate goal is to show that philosophy becomes philosophy through the human being himself.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.I. Zakhatsev ◽  
D.V. Maslennikov ◽  
V.P. Salnikov

The monograph studies the relation between the "first philosophy" as the doctrine about the unity of thinking and existence, on one hand, and the philosophy of law as a specialised philosophical science, on the other. This paper explores the methodological and general theoretical foundations for the interpreting of the classical philosophy of law, the problems of monism and dualism in the justification of the theory of law, the relations between law and morality, law and religion, and the Absolute in law. The notion of absolute freedom as a paradigm of the classical German philosophical and legal school of thought is considered herein. It is demonstrated that in the classical philosophy of law as presented by Kant, Fichte and Hegel, this foundation is used to overcome both the paradigm of substantive natural law and the paradigm of the social contract, which remains dominant to this day. The target audience of this monograph includes researchers specialising in the history of philosophy and theory of law, legal experts, instructors, postgraduate students as well as anyone who is interested in the philosophy of law.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Laakasuo ◽  
Anton Kunnari ◽  
Jussi Palomäki ◽  
Sanna Rauhala ◽  
Mika Koverola ◽  
...  

Artificial intelligences (AIs) are widely used in tasks ranging from transportation and healthcare to military. Many tasks carried out by autonomous AIs have consequences for human well-being, but it is still unclear how people would prefer them to act in ethically difficult situations. In six studies with data from two cultures (five quantitative experiments, n = 1569, and a qualitative anthropological field study, n = 30), we presented people with hypothetical situations where a human or an advanced robot nurse is ordered to forcefully medicate an unwilling patient. We measured moral acceptance, perceived trust, and allocation of responsibility relating to the nurse’s decision of either following orders to forcefully medicate the patient, or disregarding orders to protect the patient’s autonomy. Our participants were aversive to robot nurses who forcefully medicated the patient, and preferred robot nurses who respected patient autonomy by disobeying orders. Under certain conditions, the decision to respect patient autonomy was more acceptable for robot nurses than for human nurses. Thus, our results suggest that people prefer robots that are capable of disobeying orders in favor of abstract moral principles such as valuing personal autonomy. These findings were relatively robust against manipulating the nurse’s perceived reputation and character, and whether or not the patient lived or died afterwards. We also found that moral judgment is distinct from evaluations of trust and responsibility. In general, our participants did not trust robot nurses or hold them responsible for their actions; on the other hand human nurses who forcefully medicated a patient were morally condemned but also trusted. It seems that Moral Psychology of Robotics is a new and increasingly relevant sub-field of moral psychology that requires extensive attention.


Author(s):  
Colby Dickinson

In his somewhat controversial book Remnants of Auschwitz, Agamben makes brief reference to Theodor Adorno’s apparently contradictory remarks on perceptions of death post-Auschwitz, positions that Adorno had taken concerning Nazi genocidal actions that had seemed also to reflect something horribly errant in the history of thought itself. There was within such murderous acts, he had claimed, a particular degradation of death itself, a perpetration of our humanity bound in some way to affect our perception of reason itself. The contradictions regarding Auschwitz that Agamben senses to be latent within Adorno’s remarks involve the intuition ‘on the one hand, of having realized the unconditional triumph of death against life; on the other, of having degraded and debased death. Neither of these charges – perhaps like every charge, which is always a genuinely legal gesture – succeed in exhausting Auschwitz’s offense, in defining its case in point’ (RA 81). And this is the stance that Agamben wishes to hammer home quite emphatically vis-à-vis Adorno’s limitations, ones that, I would only add, seem to linger within Agamben’s own formulations in ways that he has still not come to reckon with entirely: ‘This oscillation’, he affirms, ‘betrays reason’s incapacity to identify the specific crime of Auschwitz with certainty’ (RA 81).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document