scholarly journals Stereotactic radiosurgery as a primary treatment modality for pineal parenchymal tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-790
Author(s):  
S. Ahn ◽  
J.S. Park ◽  
J.H. Song ◽  
Y.K. Hong ◽  
S.S. Jeun ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Toba N. Niazi ◽  
Christian A. Bowers ◽  
Meic H. Schmidt

Stereotactic radiosurgery to benign tumors of the spine has not been advocated as a primary treatment modality because of the favorable prognosis for these lesions after gross-total resection. There is even less evidence regarding its use as an adjuvant to neurosurgical resection of benign recurrent spinal disease. We describe the case of a 30-year-old man with a thoracic spinal schwannoma who had an interval increase of his lesion five months after thoracoscopic microsurgical resection. The patient opted for noninvasive stereotactic radiosurgery in lieu of additional surgical excision and has had stable disease 15 months after radiosurgical treatment with the linear accelerator (LINAC) system. In this setting, stereotactic radiosurgery provided a useful adjunct to thoracoscopic microsurgical resection. Future Class I and II evidence should be sought to evaluate the utility of stereotactic radiosurgery as a primary treatment modality or as an adjuvant for microneurosurgical resection of benign spinal lesions in patients who want noninvasive treatment after disease recurrence or who harbor medical comorbidities that would preclude them from being safe surgical candidates.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 914-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aftab A. Khan ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE Hemangiomas are rare but highly vascular tumors that may develop in the cavernous sinus or orbit. These tumors pose diagnostic as well as therapeutic challenges to neurosurgeons during attempted removal. We analyzed our increasing experience using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS Eight symptomatic patients with hemangiomas underwent SRS between 1988 and 2007. The presenting symptoms included headache, orbital pain, diplopia, ptosis, proptosis and impaired visual acuity. The hemangiomas were located in either the cavernous sinus (7 patients) or the orbit (1 patient). Four patients underwent SRS as primary treatment modality based on clinical and imaging criteria. Four patients had previous microsurgical partial excision or biopsy. The median target volume was 6.8 mL (range, 2.5–18 mL). The median prescription dose delivered to the margin was 14.5 Gy (range, 12.5–19 Gy). The dose to the optic nerve in all patients was less than 9 Gy (range, 4.5–9 Gy). RESULTS The median follow-up period after SRS was 80 months (range, 40–127 months). Six patients had symptomatic improvement; 2 patients reported persistent diplopia. Follow-up imaging revealed tumor regression in 7 patients and no change in tumor volume in 1 patient. All the patients improved after SRS. CONCLUSION Our extended experience confirms that SRS is an effective management strategy for symptomatic intracavernous and intraorbital hemangiomas. Our study is the first long-term report on the safety and efficacy of SRS.


2019 ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Oren Sagher

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is an uncommon, but devastating pain condition. It shares many features with trigeminal neuralgia, but predominantly affects the posterior tongue and pharynx. Since glossopharyngeal neuralgia pain is frequently triggered by swallowing or movement of the tongue, patients frequently present with weight loss and dehydration. This chapter describes the classic features of this condition, including its association with syncope. The medical management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia is outlined as a primary treatment modality. Surgical considerations are also described, including microvascular decompression or sectioning of the glossopharyngeal nerve. Surgical pearls for both of these procedures are outlined, as well as strategies for complication avoidance and management.


Oral Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 104434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine O. Allen-Ayodabo ◽  
Antoine Eskander ◽  
Laura E. Davis ◽  
Haoyu Zhao ◽  
Alyson L. Mahar ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 630-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh F. Biller

The diagnosis of angiofibroma can be suspected in most cases by clinical examination, supplemented by routine x-rays and tomograms and is confirmed by angiography. Adjunctive therapy including embolization, estrogens, cryotherapy and arterial ligation is discussed. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment. Radiotherapy as the primary treatment modality is contra-indicated except in select cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document