scholarly journals A USABILITY RESEARCH ON TASK PREDICTION FOR EXPERIENCED USERS WITH COGTOOL

2021 ◽  
pp. 46-53
Author(s):  
Kaan ARIK
Keyword(s):  
Usability Research

scholarly journals Mobile Mental Health Technologies: Unique Challenges and Solutions for an effective User Centered Design Methodology

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 1908-1909
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Johnson ◽  
Ann M. Bisantz ◽  
Amy L. Reynolds ◽  
Scott T. Meier
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Research Protocol ◽  
User Centered Design ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Health Concerns ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Mental Health Issues ◽  
Mental Health Concerns ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
User Centered

Mobile technologies are rapidly becoming a tool for collaborative health care and increasing access to health information and treatment. Mental health is one area of healthcare that may be particularly suited to mobile health technologies because of barriers including insufficient numbers of providers and access concerns such as lack of insurance coverage. Previous research has found that many people are interested in utilizing mobile health technologies for mental health (Shand, Ridani, Tighe, & Christensen, 2013; McManama, LeCloux, Ross, Gironda, & Wharff, 2017; Pauwels et al., 2017). Many mental health applications currently available have been found to be unengaging, difficult to use, and some may even be detrimental to the user (Aguirre, McCoy, & Roan, 2013; Larsen, Nicholas, and Christensen, 2016). Research has also shown that traditional usability standards and guidelines for design do not apply to persons with mental health concerns (Rotondi, et al., 2007). The most effective way to develop mobile applications for mental health that are both effective and user friendly is to take a user centered design approach incorporating those with mental health issues into the design process. One barrier to this has been the perception that those with mental health concerns are incapable of participating in research or that it may be harmful for them to do so. More recent research has shown that not only is it possible for those with even severe mental health issues to participate in research, but that it can be beneficial to those participants (Gibson, Boden, Benson, & Brand, 2014; Hutchinson, Wilson, & Wilson 1994, Biddle, et al., 2013). Involving individuals with mental health concerns in application development has become increasingly prevalent and important, thus making it appropriate to consider, the special needs of the population and the potential adaptations that may need to be made to traditional research protocols and user centered design methods. Population While the population of those with mental health concerns is as diverse as the general population at large, certain characteristics are over-represented in the population of those with mental health concerns. These can include a lower than average amount of education, lower socio-economic status, and diminished cognitive functioning (Yu and Williams, 1999; Vick, Jones, & Mitra, 2012, Rock, Rosier, Riedel, & Blackwell, 2014). These characteristics can impact participation in usability research in several ways that necessitate adaptations to commonly used design methods and research practices. Additionally, due to the high levels of stigma and increased needs for privacy present with this population further considerations are warranted. Methods Recommended adaptations include both adaptations to the overall research protocol as well as those pertaining to specific methods. One example of an adaptation to the overall research protocol is a reduced expectation for duration and frequency of participation because of decreased frustration tolerance related to mental health concerns (Ellis, Vanderlind, & Beevers 2013). Another example would be adjustments to the consent process such as ongoing assessment of ability to consent (Tee & Lathlean, 2004) due to changes in intensity of mental health symptomology. Other general considerations include use of collaborative and culturally sensitive language (Kelly, Wakeman, & Saitz, 2015; Granello & Gibbs, 2016; Bonevski, et al. 2014), avoiding the use of content that may be insensitive or may unnecessarily exacerbate symptoms, (Bonevski, et al., 2014), and paying attention to the layout and content of study materials so as to meet the need of those who are experiencing cognitive difficulties resulting from their mental health symptoms (Friedman and Bryen, 2007; Rotondi, et al., 2013, and Rotondi, et al., 2007). An example of an adaptation more specific to method would be considering one on one interview instead of a focus group due to increased privacy concerns and potential for anxiety related to disclosing in groups. Conclusion Taking into consideration the unique needs of the population of those with mental health concerns will allow for the design of applications that better serve them. This will improve the utility, accessibility, and propagation of such applications and has the potential to both improve existing services and to expand access. Acknowledgements: We would like to acknowledge Capstone Behavioral Healthcare for their ongoing support of usability research with those with mental health concerns.

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Calon Konselor dalam Menulis Proposal Penelitian

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Ardimen Ardimen
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Research Proposal ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Research Problems ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
Concept Theory ◽  
Increased Activity

The purpose of this research is to improve the ability of prospective counselor in writing a research proposal through Problem Based Learning method/ Inquiry (PBL/I) and in particular its purpose is to (1) determine the increased activity of the prospective counselor in writing a research proposal with PBL/I method, and (2) the increase in the ability of prospective counselors in writing a research proposal. This study uses classroom action research with the research subjects were VII semester student majoring BK IAIN Batusangkar. The results of the study in the first cycle showed an increase in activity and the ability of prospective counselors in writing a research proposal. This increase is very varied in accordance with the capability and experience of the students. The results of the second cycle study showed mastery of each indicator, but the indicators are controlled and enhanced by the prospective counselor in the research proposal is; select and formulate the title of the actual and straightforward, choosing and using the concept/ theory/ reference that is current and relevant to support the research problem, enter the empirical facts in the background of the problem, restrict and define problems, formulate objectives in line with the formulation of research problems, formulating usability research, select and use the theory / concept of the actual, choose the appropriate method to the problem and research objectives, and the ability to follow the format of the research proposal.

Children and Adults Working Together in the Zone of Proximal Development: A Concept for User-Centered Design

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne Bowler ◽  
Andrew Large ◽  
Jamshid Beheshti ◽  
Valerie Nesset
Keyword(s):  
Information Retrieval ◽  
Zone Of Proximal Development ◽  
User Centered Design ◽  
Proximal Development ◽  
Retrieval Systems ◽  
Information Retrieval Systems ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
Tools And Techniques ◽  
User Centered

This paper explores the theory of a zone of proximal development from the perspective of usability research and user-centered approaches to the design of information retrieval systems. Using concrete examples (dialogue, tools and techniques) from the inter-generational design teams of Large et al, this study will show how structuring usability research around Vygotsky’s theory of a zone of proximal development can offer a robust conceptual framework for eliciting responses from children on information retrieval issues and for defining the role that children can play in the design process.Cet article présente la théorie de la zone prochaine de développement à partir de la perspective de la convivialité de la recherche et des approches orientées utilisateurs pour la conception de systèmes de recherche d’information. Utilisant des exemples concrets (dialogue, outils et techniques) tirés des équipes de conception intergénérationnelles de Large et al., cette étude démontrera comment la structuration de la convivialité de la recherche autour de la théorie de la zone prochaine de développement de Vygotsky peut offrir une cadre … 

Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research

2003 ◽  
pp. 573-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J.K. Jacob ◽  
Keith S. Karn
Keyword(s):  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
Computer Interaction

scholarly journals Heuristic Evaluation of A Tesla Model 3 Interface

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 1515-1519
Author(s):  
Eva L. Parkhurst ◽  
Lindsay B. Conner ◽  
James C. Ferraro ◽  
Mar E. Navarro ◽  
Mustapha Mouloua
Keyword(s):  
Steering Wheel ◽  
Heuristic Evaluation ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Interface System ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
Heuristic Analysis

Usability research is important in our age of developing technology as it has significant implications for how technology is perceived by users. In 2017 Tesla released the Model 3, their most affordable electric-only vehicle to date. The vehicle is unique in its simplistic inner controls, composed of a single centralized touchscreen and instrumentation on the steering wheel. A heuristic analysis was conducted on the interface system of a Model 3 and several heuristic violations were identified. Suggestions to remedy the usability issues were provided along with considerations for future design of such interfaces.

scholarly journals Usability Evaluation of The Interactive 3D Virtual Reality Cultural Heritage Museum Display: Fountain of The Lions Software Application

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.28) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
J G. ◽  
Tromp . ◽  
A Wolff ◽  
J C. Torres ◽  
Hoang Thi My
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Task Analysis ◽  
Usability Evaluation ◽  
Heuristic Evaluation ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Museum Visitors ◽  
Interactive 3D ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
Museum Display

In this usability evaluation of the Fountain of the Lions software application aimed to be used by museum visitors, the software is analysed using three established usability research methods: personas, a cognitive walkthrough (task analysis) with three participants, and an individual heuristic evaluation. Areas in which the software succeeds and areas which could use improvement are discussed based on the results of these analyses, including use of the methods. 

Usability: Adoption, Measurement, Value

2020 ◽  
pp. 001872081989509
Author(s):  
Janine D. Mator ◽  
William E. Lehman ◽  
Wyatt McManus ◽  
Sarah Powers ◽  
Lauren Tiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Data Interpretation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Training Materials ◽  
Aging Populations ◽  
Usability Research ◽  
Future Theory ◽  
Insight Into

Objective We searched for the application of usability in the literature with a focus on adoption, measurements employed, and demonstrated value. Five human factors domains served as a platform for our reflection, which included the last 20 years. Background As usability studies continue to accumulate, there has been only a little past reflection on usability and contributions across a variety of applications. Our research provides a background for general usability, and we target specific usability research subareas within transportation, aging populations, autistic populations, telehealth, and cybersecurity. Method “Usability” research was explored across five different domains within human factors. The goal was not to perform an exhaustive review but, rather, sample usability practices within several specific subareas. We focused on answering three questions: How was usability adopted? How was it measured? How was it framed in terms of value? Conclusion We found that usability is very domain specific. Usability benchmarking studies and empirical standards are rare. The value associated with improving usability ranged widely—from monetary benefits to saving lives. Thus, researchers are motivated to further improve usability practices. A number of data collection and interpretation challenges still call for solutions. Application Findings offer insight into the development of usability, as applied across a variety of subdomains. Our reflection ought to inform future theory development efforts. We are concerned about the lack of established benchmarks, which can help ground data interpretation. Future research should address this gap in the literature. We note that our findings can be used to develop better training materials for future usability researchers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document