Sensitivity and Specificity of Dickkopf-1 Protein in Serum for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Qin Yang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Combined Test ◽  
Dickkopf 1

Objective This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of positive serum Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Material and methods Articles listed on Embase, PubMed, Wanfang, Weipu Periodical Database or the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and published up to July 10, 2013, were searched in either English or Chinese. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve were calculated to summarize the overall test performance. Results Four articles (6 studies) provided DKK1 diagnostic data. The pooled SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR, DOR and area under the sROC curve of DKK1 for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.65 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.52-0.76), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.82-0.98), 10.1 (95% CI, 3.68-27.74), 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28-0.51), 26.90 (95% CI, 10.45-69.19) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87), respectively. Three articles (5 studies) provided DKK1 and α-fetoprotein (AFP) combined test data. The pooled SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR, DOR and area under the sROC curve of combined detection for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91), 5.52 (95% CI, 3.76-8.10), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.19-0.27), 24.60 (95% CI, 17.69-34.19) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91), respectively. Conclusion Both DKK1 and DKK1 plus AFP had high diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of HCC.

scholarly journals K-rasMutational Status in Cytohistological Tissue as a Molecular Marker for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Jingjing Li ◽  
Rong Zhu ◽  
Huawei Zhang ◽  
Yuanyuan Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Pancreatic Tissue ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Diagnostic Significance

Background. More clinically meaningful diagnostic tests are needed in pancreatic cancer (PC).K-rasmutations are the most frequently acquired genetic alteration.Methods. Original research articles involving the diagnostic accuracy ofK-rasmutation detection in PC were selected. Data were presented as forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis was used to summarize the overall test performance.Results. We assessed 19 studies from 16 published articles. The reports were divided into three groups according to the process used to obtain the test material. The summary estimates for detectingK-rasstatus using an invasive method (fine needle aspiration (FNA), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or surgery) were better than cytology: the pooled sensitivity was 77% (95% confidence interval (CI): 74–80%) versus 54% (95% CI: 47–61%); specificity was 88% (95% CI: 85–91%) versus 91% (95% CI: 83–96%); and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 20.26 (11.40–36.03) versus 7.52 (95% CI: 2.80–20.18), respectively. When two procedures were combined, the diagnostic accuracy was markedly improved.Conclusions. The analysis ofK-rasmutations in pancreatic tissue has a promising diagnostic significance in PC. Further valuable studies are needed.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of Autoantibodies in Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 2631-2646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangyue Qin ◽  
Ni Zeng ◽  
Ting Yang ◽  
Chun Wan ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background/Aims: Recently, many studies have demonstrated that various tumor-associated autoantibodies have been detected in early stages of lung cancer. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate available evidence on the diagnostic value of autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens in lung cancer. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and other databases through 23 March 2018. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. We used the bivariate mixed-effect models to calculate pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Deek’s funnel plot was used to detect publication bias. Results: Review of 468 candidate articles identified fifty-three articles with a total of 11,515 patients for qualitative review and meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the SROC curve were as follows for tumor-associated autoantibodies against the following proteins: p53, 0.19, 0.98, 0.82; NY-ESO-1, 0.17, 0.98, 0.90; Survivin, 0.19, 0.99, 0.96; c-myc, 0.14, 0.98, 0.45; Cyclin B1, 0.18, 0.98, 0.91; GBU4-5, 0.07, 0.98, 0.91; CAGE, 0.14, 0.98, 0.90; p16, 0.08, 0.97, 0.91; SOX2, 0.14, 0.99, 0.93; and HuD, 0.17, 0.99, 0.82. Conclusion: Each tumor-associated autoantibody on its own showed excellent diagnostic specificity for lung cancer but inadequate sensitivity. Our results suggest that combinations or panels of tumor-associated autoantibodies may provide better sensitivity for diagnosing lung cancer, and the diagnostic accuracy of tumor-associated autoantibodies should be validated in more studies.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) in Detecting Antibodies againstMycobacterium lepraein Leprosy Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Ariel Espinosa ◽  
Silvana Margarida Benevides Ferreira ◽  
Fabiana Gulin Longhi Palacio ◽  
Denise da Costa Boamorte Cortela ◽  
Eliane Ignotti
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Immunosorbent Assays ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

IgM againstMycobacterium lepraemay be detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on phenolic glycolipid I (PGL-I) or natural disaccharide octyl bovine serum albumin (ND-O-BSA) as antigens, and the IgG response can be detected by an ELISA based on lipid droplet protein 1 (LID-1). The titers of antibodies against these antigens vary with operational classification. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of ELISAs involving PGL-I and ND-O-BSA with that involving LID-1. We included studies that analyze multibacillary and paucibacillary leprosy cases and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ELISAs based on LID-1 and/or PGL-I or ND-O-BSA as antigens to measure antibody titers againstM. leprae. Studies were found via PubMed, the Virtual Health Library Regional Portal, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Índice Bibliográfico Espanhol de Ciências de Saúde, the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Cochrane Library, Embase (the Elsevier database), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies served as a methodological validity tool. Quantitative data were extracted using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and a diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, and a hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curve and forest plots were constructed. The protocol register code for this meta-analysis is PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017055983. Nineteen studies were included. ND-O-BSA showed better overall performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio when compared with PGL-I and LID-1. The multibacillary group showed better performance on these parameters (than the paucibacillary group did), at 94%, 99%, 129, 0.05, and 2293, respectively. LID-1 did not provide any advantage regarding the overall estimate of sensitivity in comparison with PGL-I or ND-O-BSA.

scholarly journals Diagnosis accuracy of serum glypican-3 level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Tiezheng Wang ◽  
Boxun Jin ◽  
Wenlei Li ◽  
Zhenshun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Design Deficiencies ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Previous studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of serum glypican-3 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the results remain inconsistent and even controversial. Thus, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of serum glypican-3 for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: A meta-analysis including 22 studies was performed with 2325 cases and 2280 controls. Relevant studies were searched in the EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, covering relevant papers published until November 1, 2017. The quality of the studies was assessed by revised QUADAS tools. Sensitivity, specificity, and other measures were pooled and determined to evaluate the accuracy of serum glypican-3 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) analysis was performed to summarize the overall test performance. Results: The results showed that the pooled overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence interval (CI) for serum glypican-3 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma were 68% (56-79%) and 92% (82-96.0%), respectively. Besides, the summary diagnostic odds ratio and 95% CI for glypican-3 were 23.53 (8.57-64.63). In addition, the area under sROC and 95% CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.90). The major design deficiencies of included studies were differential verification bias, and a lack of clear exclusion and inclusion criteria. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that serum glypican-3 was acceptable as a moderate diagnostic marker in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with healthy individuals, which could elevate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. Furthermore, more well-designed studies with large sample sizes are needed to show the effectiveness of glypican-3 in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for acute pulmonary embolism - a systematic review and meta-analysis

VASA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Jiangbo Li ◽  
Jian Tang
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Angiography ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Acute Pe ◽  
Limited Sensitivity

Abstract. Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted that included studies from January 2000 to August 2015 using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Springer link. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) as well as the 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRA for acute PE. Meta-disc software version 1.4 was used to analyze the data. Results: Five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (86 %, 95 % CI: 81 % to 90 %) and specificity (99 %, 95 % CI: 98 % to 100 %) demonstrated that MRA diagnosis had limited sensitivity and high specificity in the detection of acute PE. The pooled estimate of PLR (41.64, 95 % CI: 17.97 to 96.48) and NLR (0.17, 95 % CI: 0.11 to 0.27) provided evidence for the low missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis rates of MRA for acute PE. The high diagnostic accuracy of MRA for acute PE was demonstrated by the overall DOR (456.51, 95 % CI: 178.38 - 1168.31) and SROC curves (AUC = 0.9902 ± 0.0061). Conclusions: MRA can be used for the diagnosis of acute PE. However, due to limited sensitivity, MRA cannot be used as a stand-alone test to exclude acute PE.

scholarly journals Accuracy of angiopoietin-2 for predicting organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052098670
Author(s):  
Yongcai Lv ◽  
Yanhua Yao ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Jingjing Lei
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Angiopoietin 2

Objective Our aim was to assess the accuracy of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) as a prognostic marker for acute pancreatitis (AP) with organ failure (OF). Methods We undertook a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Journals Full-text, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc, and Weipu databases to identify eligible cohort studies on the predictive value of Ang-2 for AP with OF. The main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity. The effects were pooled using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Results Six articles with seven case-control studies (n = 650) were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AP with OF were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.75–0.99), 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.92), 6.40 (95%CI: 3.36–12.19), and 0.08 (95%CI: 0.02–0.36), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92–0.96), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 83.18 (95%CI: 11.50–623.17). Subgroup analysis showed that admission time of AP onset (< or ≥24 hours) was a source of overall heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis supported this finding. Conclusion Ang-2 had high diagnostic accuracy for AP with OF; the best prediction of Ang-2 may be 24 to 72 hours after onset of AP.

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis: Urinary Calprotectin for Discrimination of Intrinsic and Prerenal Acute Kidney Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Jin Chen ◽  
Pei-Chun Fan ◽  
George Kou ◽  
Su-Wei Chang ◽  
Yi-Ting Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Urinary calprotectin is a novel biomarker that distinguishes between intrinsic or prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI) in different studies. However, these studies were based on different populations and different AKI criteria. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of urinary calprotectin and compared its diagnostic performance in different AKI criteria and study populations. Method: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database up to September 2018. The diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin (sensitivity, specificity, predictive ratio, and cutoff point) was extracted and evaluated. Result: This study included six studies with a total of 502 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 15.15, and the negative LR was 0.11. The symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (symmetric SROC) with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.9667. The relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOC) of the adult to pediatric population and RDOCs of different acute kidney injury criteria showed no significant difference in their diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: Urinary calprotectin is a good diagnostic tool for the discrimination of intrinsic and prerenal AKI under careful inspection after exclusion of urinary tract infection and urogenital malignancies. Its performance is not affected by different AKI criteria and adult or pediatric populations.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of MiR-92a in Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanxu Guo ◽  
Yuhang Wang ◽  
Yongtian Li ◽  
Zishu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Prognostic Analysis ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Diagnostic And Prognostic Value

Abstract Background: miR-92a been proposed to have a significant role in the diagnosis andprognosis of different types of tumors, but the potential impact of its expression is still controversial due to the sample size. We conducted the meta-analysis to figure out whether miR-92a could be used as a detecting tool and prognosis of gastric cancer.Method: A literature search was performedby retrieving Web ofScience, PubMed, EMBASE, ChineseNational Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP(Technology of Chongqing databases) and Wanfang databases (last update by February2020). The sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were pooled to explore the diagnostic performance of miR-92a.The pooled HRs and 95%CIs of miR-92a for overall survival (OS) were calculated to explore the prognostic performance of miR-92a. Subgroup and meta-analysis were further carried out to explore the heterogeneity.Results: 10 articles with12 studies were included. The pooled SEN and SPE were 0.76 (95% CI 0.64–0.85) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.63–0.90).Besides, the pooled PLR and NLR were3.7(95% CI 1.8–7.5)and 0.30 (95% CI 0.18–0.50), and the pooled DOR was 12(95% CI4–38). AUC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81–0.87), indicating asignificant value of miR-92a in the gastric cancer detection. For the prognostic analysis of miR-92a in gastric cancer, the univariate and multivariate data’s poor OS were 1.46(95% CI0.87-2.45) and 1.46(95% CI0.90-2.39).Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that miR-92a could be a potential biomarker for thedetection of gastric cancer.Furthermore,high expression of miR-92a has a negative association with the survivalof patients, suggesting its potential as a prognostic indicator in gastric cancer.

scholarly journals EUS-Guided FNA for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: a Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 1197-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi-Xian Wang ◽  
Jun Xiao ◽  
Matthew Orange ◽  
Hu Zhang ◽  
You-Qing Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Cystic Lesions ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Fluid Analysis

Background: Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) must be reliable as the current standard treatment, major or total pancreatectomy, dramatically affects quality of life. Additionally, early diagnosis of malignancy is essential to an improved prognosis. The diagnostic accuracy of fluid analysis using endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been demonstrated in pancreatic solid lesions. The utility of this technique in the diagnosis of PCLs is still unknown. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases. Studies differentiating benign and malignant PCLs via EUS-FNA were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) was adopted to evaluate the selected studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve analyses were conducted. Two main classification types of malignancy were characterized and analyzed. We also generated a subgroup analysis of available clinical factors. Publication bias was evaluated by Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: Sixteen studies containing 1024 subjects have been published. The pooled sensitivity for malignant cytology according to classification 1 was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.45-0.58), and pooled specificity was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). When the detected PCLs were identified as classification 2, suspicious malignancy or potential malignancy, sensitivity and specificity were similar, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.46-0.57) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98) respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that EUS-FNA is a reliable clinical tool for the diagnosis of PCLs. However, a more accurate algorithm is needed to reduce various biases and to improve the sensitivity of EUS-FNA in the detection of malignant PCLs.

scholarly journals A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of dengue virus-specific IgA antibody-based tests for detection of dengue infection

2015 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 876-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. ALAGARASU ◽  
A. M. WALIMBE ◽  
S. M. JADHAV ◽  
A. R. DEOSHATWAR
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dengue Infection ◽  
Immunoglobulin A ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Likelihood Ratios

SUMMARYImmunoglobulin A (IgA)-based tests have been evaluated in different studies for their utility in diagnosing dengue infections. In most of the studies, the results were inconclusive because of a small sample size. Hence, a meta-analysis involving nine studies with 2096 samples was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of IgA-based tests in diagnosing dengue infections. The analysis was conducted using Meta-Disc software. The results revealed that IgA-based tests had an overall sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 73·9%, 95·2%, 66·7, 22·0 and 0·25, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed between the studies. The type of test, infection status and day of sample collection influenced the diagnostic accuracy. The IgA-based diagnostic tests showed a greater accuracy when the samples were collected 4 days after onset of symptoms and for secondary infections. The results suggested that IgA-based tests had a moderate level of accuracy and are diagnostic of the disease. However, negative results cannot be used alone for dengue diagnosis. More prospective studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of combinations of antigen-based tests with either IgA or IgM are needed and might be useful for suggesting the best strategy for dengue diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document