題目設定引導設計邏輯發展之教學研究
<p>傳統的建築設計課程皆以每學期幾次不同題型的設定，期望在設計操作的反復練習中，幫助操作者探索合適的操作方法並從中建立設計邏輯。設計題目的設定規範了操作的方向與期望的成果，但因設計發展並沒有既定的步驟與方法，常因個人經驗與所選擇設計方式的不同，導致過於感性的思維模式，也造就了理性建築設計教學的挑戰。此研究針對題目設定與設計邏輯的關係，試圖避開操作者可預期的結果，並藉過程中不同階段性的操作設定，試圖建立一種設計邏輯發展的依據。</p> <p> </p><p>Traditionally, architecture design studio requires few exercises per semester for students to practice design method and develop design thinking. As design exercises often direct design approach and also establish expectation of outcome, there is no guaranty procedure or design method to follow in order to achieve the best outcome. Since design development heavily based on experience of operation and choice of approach, sensible thinking process is often involved and sets challenge for rational architectural pedagogy. This research aims to exam the design thinking process of students by setting up specific design exercise to avoid predictable operation process, in order to direct specific design approach according to established guidance for further development. </p> <p> </p>
Computational Simulation as an Organizational Prototyping Tool
