Critical Care of Gynecological and Obstetric Patients: A decade of surgical intensive care experience

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
S. Khawaga ◽  
N. Ei Sayed ◽  
N. Shaikh ◽  
G. Mustafa ◽  
M.A. Kettern ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Burke ◽  
P Balfe

Abstract Introduction The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has presented unforeseen threats and stresses to healthcare systems around the world, most notably in the ability to provide critical care. Aim To assess surgical NCHD experience in providing critical care and working in an intensive care environment. Method An electronic survey was distributed amongst surgical trainees and then amongst individual surgical departments. Ten questions were included in the survey assessing the NCHD’s experience with aspects of critical care. Results 39 respondents including 16 specialist registrars, 3 senior registrars, 11 registrars and 9 senior house officers. 18% of respondents had previous experience in anaesthetics or intensive care. 23% self-reported being competent in performing endotracheal intubation. 15% self-reported being competent in the use of CPAP and BiPaP, 5% did not know what these were. 20% self-reported being competent in the use of AIRVO. 15% self-reported being competent in placing central and arterial lines. 15% self-reported being competent in starting and adjusting inotropes/vasopressors. 49% reported completing a CCRISP or BASIC course. 85% felt that a rotation in anaesthesia should be a routine part of surgical training. Conclusions Whilst there is critical care experience amongst the surgical NCHD cohort there remains room for further development.


2021 ◽  
pp. e20200069
Author(s):  
Anastasia N.L. Newman ◽  
Michelle E. Kho ◽  
Jocelyn E. Harris ◽  
Alison Fox-Robichaud ◽  
Patricia Solomon

Purpose: This article describes current physiotherapy practice for critically ill adult patients requiring prolonged stays in critical care (> 3 d) after complicated cardiac surgery in Ontario. Method: We distributed an electronic, self-administered 52-item survey to 35 critical care physiotherapists who treat adult cardiac surgery patients at 11 cardiac surgical sites. Pilot testing and clinical sensibility testing were conducted beforehand. Participants were sent four email reminders. Results: The response rate was 80% (28/35). The median (inter-quartile range) reported number of cardiac surgeries performed per week was 30 (10), with a median number of 14.5 (4) cardiac surgery beds per site. Typical reported caseloads ranged from 6 to 10 patients per day pe therapist, and 93% reported that they had initiated physiotherapy with patients once they were clinically stable in the intensive care unit. Of 28 treatments, range of motion exercises (27; 96.4%), airway clearance techniques (26; 92.9%), and sitting at the edge of the bed (25; 89.3%) were the most common. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appeared to limit physiotherapy practice. Use of outcome measures was limited. Conclusions: Physiotherapists provide a variety of interventions with critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Further evaluation of the limited use of outcome measures in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S357-S358
Author(s):  
Kelsie Cowman ◽  
Victor Chen ◽  
Nidhi Saraiya ◽  
Yi Guo ◽  
Rachel Bartash ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) provides risk-adjusted Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratios (SAAR) as a benchmark for medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU). Antibiotic use (AU) data does not provide patient-level information (e.g., antibiotic appropriateness, indications, durations, etc.). However, we hypothesize that AU data can help define high impact stewardship targets, particularly in the context of critical care Clostridioides difficile rates. Methods Units with high rates of AU and hospital-onset (HO) C. difficile were selected for review. A monthly AU and C. difficile dashboard was created for ICU providers, inclusive of data from May 2018 onwards. We also performed chart audits for indication, duration, and location of initiation for all medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) or vancomycin (Van) during February 2019 per request of ICU stakeholders. Data were used to obtain stewardship buy-in from local MICU champions. Results AU data indicated that (1) all 3 MICUs consistently had SAARs >1 for broad-spectrum categories and (2) Van and P/T were the highest volume agents on these units (Figure 1). Chart audit of 135 MICU patients showed that 17 patients received P/T, 34 Van, and 84 (62%) both agents; median duration was 2 days for Van and 3 days for P/T (Figure 2). Approximately half of initiations occurred in the emergency department (ED) (50% Van, 47% P/T); most common indications were “respiratory tract infection” and “severe sepsis/septic shock” for both P/T (77%) and Van (74%) (Figure 2). HO C. difficile in MICUs accounted for 6%, 13%, and 16% of total HO C. difficile cases in campuses A, B, and C, respectively during the time frame (Figure 1). Conclusion We feel that NHSN data scratches the surface of the deep-rooted challenges of ICU stewardship. However, it can identify AU trends and most frequently prescribed antibiotics in the context of unit-specific C. difficile rates. Intensive stewardship audit can further uncover areas for intervention, such as ED Van and P/T overprescribing. We suggest presenting clinical stakeholders with a quarterly “stewardship dashboard” combining AU rates, patient-level data, and C. difficile rates to maximize the impact of stewardship endeavors. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 360-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Ann Collins ◽  
Matthew P Robertson ◽  
Corinna P Sicoutris ◽  
Michael A Pisa ◽  
Daniel N Holena ◽  
...  

Introduction There is an increased demand for intensive care unit (ICU) beds. We sought to determine if we could create a safe surge capacity model to increase ICU capacity by treating ICU patients in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) utilizing a collaborative model between an ICU service and a telemedicine service during peak ICU bed demand. Methods We evaluated patients managed by the surgical critical care service in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) compared to patients managed in the virtual intensive care unit (VICU) located within the PACU. A retrospective review of all patients seen by the surgical critical care service from January 1st 2008 to July 31st 2011 was conducted at an urban, academic, tertiary centre and level 1 trauma centre. Results Compared to the SICU group ( n = 6652), patients in the VICU group ( n = 1037) were slightly older (median age 60 (IQR 47–69) versus 58 (IQR 44–70) years, p = 0.002) and had lower acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores (median 10 (IQR 7–14) versus 15 (IQR 11–21), p < 0.001). The average amount of time patients spent in the VICU was 13.7 + /–9.6 hours. In the VICU group, 750 (72%) of patients were able to be transferred directly to the floor; 287 (28%) required subsequent admission to the surgical intensive care unit. All patients in the VICU group were alive upon transfer out of the PACU while mortality in the surgical intensive unit cohort was 5.5%. Discussion A collaborative care model between a surgical critical care service and a telemedicine ICU service may safely provide surge capacity during peak periods of ICU bed demand. The specific patient populations for which this approach is most appropriate merits further investigation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randeep S. Jawa, MD ◽  
Jagtar S. Heir, DO ◽  
David Cancelada, MD ◽  
David H. Young, MD ◽  
David W. Mercer, MD

The provision of critical care in any environment is resource intensive. However, the provision of critical care in an austere environment/mass disaster zone is particularly challenging.While providers are well trained for care in a modern intensive care unit, they may be underprepared for resource-poor environments where there are limited or unfamiliar equipment and fewer support personnel. Based primarily on our experiences at a field hospital in Haiti, we created a short guide to critical care in a mass disaster in an austere environment. This guide will be useful to the team of physicians, nurses, respiratory care, logistics, and other support personnel who volunteer in future critical care relief efforts in limited resource settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nissar Shaikh ◽  
MM Nainthramveetil ◽  
Shoaib Nawaz ◽  
Jazib Hassan ◽  
Ahmed A Shible ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kozub ◽  
Maribel Hibanada-Laserna ◽  
Gwen Harget ◽  
Laurie Ecoff

Background: To accommodate a higher demand for critical care nurses, an orientation program in a surgical intensive care unit was revised and streamlined. Two theoretical models served as a foundation for the revision and resulted in clear clinical benchmarks for orientation progress evaluation. Purpose: The purpose of the project was to integrate theoretical frameworks into practice to improve the unit orientation program. Methods: Performance improvement methods served as a framework for the revision, and outcomes were measured before and after implementation. Results: The revised orientation program increased 1- and 2-year nurse retention and decreased turnover. Critical care knowledge increased after orientation for both the preintervention and postintervention groups. Conclusion: Incorporating a theoretical basis for orientation has been shown to be successful in increasing the number of nurses completing orientation and improving retention, turnover rates, and knowledge gained.


1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
BC Friedman ◽  
W Boyce ◽  
CE Bekes

Critical care medicine programs must provide outpatient experience for their fellowship trainees. We have developed an unusual follow-up plan allowing critical care fellows to contact their patients months after their intensive care unit stay. We evaluated responses of 46 patients after a mean interval of 8.6 months since their initial intensive care unit stay. Patients were stratified by severity of disease by using the APACHE scoring system. Diagnostically, the patients represented the typical medical-surgical intensive care unit population. Patients were asked 11 questions concerning their health and socio-emotional status as it related to their hospitalization and intensive care unit stay. Our results established a practical method of providing outpatient follow-up that may fulfill residency review requirements for critical care fellowships, confirmed previously speculative ideas about ICU experiences, and suggested future research opportunities to study intensive care unit patients following discharge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document