scholarly journals 1017. Scratching the Surface with NHSN Data: Defining High Impact Stewardship Targets in Critical Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S357-S358
Author(s):  
Kelsie Cowman ◽  
Victor Chen ◽  
Nidhi Saraiya ◽  
Yi Guo ◽  
Rachel Bartash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Chart Audit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) provides risk-adjusted Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratios (SAAR) as a benchmark for medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU). Antibiotic use (AU) data does not provide patient-level information (e.g., antibiotic appropriateness, indications, durations, etc.). However, we hypothesize that AU data can help define high impact stewardship targets, particularly in the context of critical care Clostridioides difficile rates. Methods Units with high rates of AU and hospital-onset (HO) C. difficile were selected for review. A monthly AU and C. difficile dashboard was created for ICU providers, inclusive of data from May 2018 onwards. We also performed chart audits for indication, duration, and location of initiation for all medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) or vancomycin (Van) during February 2019 per request of ICU stakeholders. Data were used to obtain stewardship buy-in from local MICU champions. Results AU data indicated that (1) all 3 MICUs consistently had SAARs >1 for broad-spectrum categories and (2) Van and P/T were the highest volume agents on these units (Figure 1). Chart audit of 135 MICU patients showed that 17 patients received P/T, 34 Van, and 84 (62%) both agents; median duration was 2 days for Van and 3 days for P/T (Figure 2). Approximately half of initiations occurred in the emergency department (ED) (50% Van, 47% P/T); most common indications were “respiratory tract infection” and “severe sepsis/septic shock” for both P/T (77%) and Van (74%) (Figure 2). HO C. difficile in MICUs accounted for 6%, 13%, and 16% of total HO C. difficile cases in campuses A, B, and C, respectively during the time frame (Figure 1). Conclusion We feel that NHSN data scratches the surface of the deep-rooted challenges of ICU stewardship. However, it can identify AU trends and most frequently prescribed antibiotics in the context of unit-specific C. difficile rates. Intensive stewardship audit can further uncover areas for intervention, such as ED Van and P/T overprescribing. We suggest presenting clinical stakeholders with a quarterly “stewardship dashboard” combining AU rates, patient-level data, and C. difficile rates to maximize the impact of stewardship endeavors. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals The Impact of Changing to an Algorithm-Based Clostridioides difficile Test on the Decision to Treat Clostridioides difficile

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s407-s407
Author(s):  
Lana Dbeibo ◽  
Joy Williams ◽  
Josh Sadowski ◽  
William Fadel ◽  
Vera Winn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Toxic Megacolon ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Critical Care Admission ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Pcr Test

Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) detects the presence of the organism; a positive result therefore cannot differentiate between colonization and the pathogenic presence of the bacterium. This may result in overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and risking disruption of microbial flora, which may perpetuate the CDI cycle. Algorithm-based testing offers an advantage over PCR testing as it detects toxin, which allows differentiation between colonization and infection. Although previous studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of this testing algorithm in differentiating infection from colonization, it is unknown whether the test changes CDI treatment decisions. Our facility switched from PCR to an algorithm-based testing method for CDI in June 2018. Objective: In this study, we evaluated whether clinicians’ decisions to treat patients are impacted by a test result that implies colonization (GDH+/Tox−/PCR+ test), and we examined the impact of this decision on patient outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of inpatients with a positive C. diff test between June 2017 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients treated for CDI. We compared this outcome in 3 groups of patients: those with a positive PCR test (June 2017–June 2018), those who had a GDH+/Tox−/PCR+ or a GDH+/Tox+ test result (June 2018–June 2019). Secondary outcomes included toxic megacolon, critical care admission, and mortality in patients with GDH+/Tox−/PCR+ who were treated versus those who were untreated. Results: Of patients with a positive PCR test, 86% were treated with CDI-specific antibiotics, whereas 70.4% with GDH+/Tox+ and 29.25% with GDH+/Tox−/PCR+ result were treated (P < .0001). Mortality was not different between patients with GDH+/Tox−/PCR+ who were treated versus those who were untreated (2.7% vs 3.4%; P = .12), neither was critical care admission within 2 or 7 days of test result (2% vs 1.4%; P = .15) and (4.1% vs 5.4%, P = .39), respectively. There were no cases of toxic megacolon during the study period. Conclusions: The change to an algorithm-based C. difficile testing method had a significant impact on the clinicians’ decisions to treat patients with a positive test, as most patients with a GDH+/Tox−/PCR+ result did not receive treatment. These patients did not suffer more adverse outcomes compared to those who were treated, which has implications for testing practices. It remains to be explored whether clinicians are using clinical criteria to decide whether or not to treat patients with a positive algorithm-based test, as opposed to the more reflexive treatment of patients with a positive PCR test.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals The Impact of Implementing Critical Care Team on Open General Intensive Care Unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ick Hee Kim ◽  
Seung Bae Park ◽  
Seonguk Kim ◽  
Sang-Don Han ◽  
Seung Seok Ki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Care Team ◽  
General Intensive Care Unit ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Critical Care Team

scholarly journals Staphylococcus aureus - selective reporting of antibiogram results and its impact on antibiotic use: Interventional study with a reference group on the effect of switching from non-selective to selective antibiotic reporting

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franka Lestin-Bernstein ◽  
Ramona Harberg ◽  
Ingo Schumacher ◽  
Lutz Briedigkeit ◽  
Oliver Heese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Selective Reporting ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies worldwide focus on optimising the use of antibiotics. Selective susceptibility reporting is recommended as an effective AMS tool although there is a lack of representative studies investigating the impact of selective susceptibility reporting on antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of selective susceptibility reporting of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) on antibiotic consumption. Enhancing the use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics such as flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin is one of the main goals in optimising antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections. Methods This interventional study with control group was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Germany. During the one-year interventional period susceptibility reports for all methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) were restricted to flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, gentamicin and rifampin/fosfomycin, instead of reporting all tested antibiotics. The impact of implementing selective reporting was analysed by monitoring total monthly antibiotic consumption in our hospital and in a reference hospital (recommended daily dose/100 occupied bed days: RDD/100 BD), as well as on an individual patient level by analysing days of therapy adjusted for bed days (DOT/ 100 BD) for patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) and respectively skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Results MSSA-antibiograms were acquired for 2836 patients. The total use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactams more than doubled after implementing selective reporting (from 1.2 to 2.8 RDD/100 BD, P < 0.001). The use of intravenous flucloxacillin/cefazolin for SAB rose significantly from 52 to 75 DOT/100 BD (plus 42%), just as the use of oral cefalexin for SSTI (from 1.4 to 9.4 DOT/100 BD, from 3 to 17 of 85/88 patients). Considering the overall consumption, there was no decrease in antibiotics omitted from the antibiogram. This was probably due to their wide use for other infections. Conclusions As narrow-spectrum beta-lactams are not widely used for other infections, their increase in the overall consumption of the entire hospital was a strong indicator that selective reporting guided clinicians to an optimised antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections. On a patient level, this assumption was verified by a significant improved treatment of S. aureus infections in the subgroups of SAB and SSTI. As useful AMS tool, we recommend implementing selective reporting rules into the national/international standards for susceptibility reporting.

scholarly journals Nosocomial infections in a pediatric surgical intensive care unit: An unicentric cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 112-116
Author(s):  
Marina Pandurov ◽  
Izabella Fabri-Galambos ◽  
Andjela Opancina ◽  
Anna Uram-Benka ◽  
Goran Rakic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumanii ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

Introduction. Nosocomial infections are a common complication in patients hospitalized in intensive care units. The aims of this research were to examine the incidence of nosocomial infections in patients admitted to the pediatric surgical intensive care unit, the impact of hospital length of stay and type of surgical disease on the incidence of nosocomial infections, the frequency of microorganisms causing nosocomial infections and their antibiotic susceptibility profile. Material and Methods. Data on 50 subjects were extracted from the database. The following data were taken from the medical histories of the examinees: age, sex, diagnosis, number of days at the hospital before admission to the intensive care unit, number of days in the intensive care unit, levels of C-reactive protein, applied antimicrobial drugs, isolated microorganisms and their susceptibility to antibiotics. Results. The incidence of nosocomial infections in the study period was 52%. Patients who developed nosocomial infection remained longer in the intensive care unit than those who did not develop it (p = 0.003). Patients with the diagnosis of acute abdomen had a statistically significantly higher incidence of nosocomial infections compared to other patients (p = 0.001). Gram-negative bacteria were the most commonly isolated pathogens (46.8%). Acinetobacter baumanii proved to be the most resistant species in this study, since 80% of the strains did not show sensitivity to any of the tested antibiotics. Conclusion. Nosocomial infections are present in slightly more than half of the patients treated at the pediatric surgical intensive care unit. Patients who developed nosocomial infections stayed longer in the pediatric surgical intensive care unit, which had negative consequences for their health and treatment costs.

scholarly journals Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Program to Reduce Health Care–Associated Infections in Both Critically Ill and Non–Critically Ill Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. e1-e8
Author(s):  
Leigh Chapman ◽  
Lisa Hargett ◽  
Theresa Anderson ◽  
Jacqueline Galluzzo ◽  
Paul Zimand
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Telemetry Unit ◽  
Health Care Associated Infections ◽  
The Impact

Background Critical care nurses take care of patients with complicated, comorbid, and compromised conditions. These patients are at risk for health care–associated infections, which affect patients’ lives and health care systems in various ways. Objective To gauge the impact of routinely bathing patients with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate solution on the incidence of health care–associated infections in a medical-surgical intensive care unit and a postoperative telemetry unit; to outline the framework for a hospital-wide presurgical chlorhexidine gluconate bathing program and share the results. Methods A standard bathing protocol using a 4% chlorhexidine gluconate solution was developed. The protocol included time studies, training, monitoring, and surveillance of health care–associated infections. Results Consistent patient bathing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate was associated with a 52% reduction in health care–associated infections in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. The same program in a postoperative telemetry unit yielded a 45% reduction in health care–associated infections. Conclusion A comprehensive daily 4% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing program can be implemented with standardized protocols and detailed instructions and can significantly reduce the incidence of health care–associated infections in intensive care unit and non–intensive care unit hospital settings.

Serratia marcescans Contamination of Antiseptic Soap Containing Triclosan: Implications for Nosocomial Infection

1984 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 427-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Anita Barry ◽  
Donald E. Craven ◽  
Theresa A. Goularte ◽  
Deborah A. Lichtenberg
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Minimal Bactericidal Concentration ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Time Kill ◽  
The Impact

Abstract During a recent investigation in our surgical intensive care unit, we found that several bottles of the antiseptic handwashing soap, OR Scrub®, were contaminated with Serratia marcescens. OR Scrub® contains 1% triclosan, lanolin, and detergents. The antimicrobial efficacy of OR Scrub® was examined in vitro using serial two-fold dilutions of soap inoculated with various concentrations of different nosocomial pathogens. The minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of OR Scrub® against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and several strains of S. marcescens was ≤1:2 By comparison, a non-antiseptic soap from the same manufacturer (Wash®) and 4% chlorhexidine (Hibiclens®) had MBCs for all strains tested of at least 1:64. Time-kill curves confirmed the findings of the initial experiments.This is the first report of extrinsic contamination of antiseptic soap containing triclosan. No infections could be attributed to the contaminated soap, but sporadic outbreaks of Serratia have occurred in the intensive care unit with no identifiable source. Although there have been few studies on the impact of antiseptic soap in reducing nosocomial infection, we question whether a soap with the limitations of OR Scrub® should be used in intensive care units or operating rooms.

Survey of Physiotherapy Practice in Ontario Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Units

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200069
Author(s):  
Anastasia N.L. Newman ◽  
Michelle E. Kho ◽  
Jocelyn E. Harris ◽  
Alison Fox-Robichaud ◽  
Patricia Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Physiotherapy Practice

Purpose: This article describes current physiotherapy practice for critically ill adult patients requiring prolonged stays in critical care (> 3 d) after complicated cardiac surgery in Ontario. Method: We distributed an electronic, self-administered 52-item survey to 35 critical care physiotherapists who treat adult cardiac surgery patients at 11 cardiac surgical sites. Pilot testing and clinical sensibility testing were conducted beforehand. Participants were sent four email reminders. Results: The response rate was 80% (28/35). The median (inter-quartile range) reported number of cardiac surgeries performed per week was 30 (10), with a median number of 14.5 (4) cardiac surgery beds per site. Typical reported caseloads ranged from 6 to 10 patients per day pe therapist, and 93% reported that they had initiated physiotherapy with patients once they were clinically stable in the intensive care unit. Of 28 treatments, range of motion exercises (27; 96.4%), airway clearance techniques (26; 92.9%), and sitting at the edge of the bed (25; 89.3%) were the most common. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appeared to limit physiotherapy practice. Use of outcome measures was limited. Conclusions: Physiotherapists provide a variety of interventions with critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Further evaluation of the limited use of outcome measures in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit is warranted.

scholarly journals A Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention To Improve Blood Culture Use among Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients: the DISTRIBUTE Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Fabre ◽  
Eili Klein ◽  
Alejandra B. Salinas ◽  
George Jones ◽  
Karen C. Carroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Control Units ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Interventions to optimize blood culture (BCx) practices in adult inpatients are limited. We conducted a before-after study evaluating the impact of a diagnostic stewardship program that aimed to optimize BCx use in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and five medicine units at a large academic center. The program included implementation of an evidence-based algorithm detailing indications for BCx use and education and feedback to providers about BCx rates and indication inappropriateness. Neutropenic patients were excluded. BCx rates from contemporary control units were obtained for comparison. The primary outcome was the change in BCxs ordered with the intervention. Secondary outcomes included proportion of inappropriate BCx, solitary BCx, and positive BCx. Balancing metrics included compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) SEP-1 BCx component, 30-day readmission, and all-cause in-hospital and 30-day mortality. After the intervention, BCx rates decreased from 27.7 to 22.8 BCx/100 patient-days (PDs) in the MICU (P = 0.001) and from 10.9 to 7.7 BCx/100 PD for the 5 medicine units combined (P < 0.001). BCx rates in the control units did not decrease significantly (surgical intensive care unit [ICU], P = 0.06; surgical units, P = 0.15). The proportion of inappropriate BCxs did not significantly change with the intervention (30% in the MICU and 50% in medicine units). BCx positivity increased in the MICU (from 8% to 11%, P < 0.001). Solitary BCxs decreased by 21% in the medicine units (P < 0.001). Balancing metrics were similar before and after the intervention. BCx use can be optimized with clinician education and practice guidance without affecting sepsis quality metrics or mortality.

scholarly journals The Impact of Changes to an Electronic Admission Order Set on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 182-189
Author(s):  
Ellen T. Muniga ◽  
Todd A. Walroth ◽  
Natalie C. Washburn
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Critical Care Admission ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Order Set

Abstract Background Implementation of disease-specific order sets has improved compliance with standards of care for a variety of diseases. Evidence of the impact admission order sets can have on care is limited. Objective The main purpose of this article is to evaluate the impact of changes made to an electronic critical care admission order set on provider prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes. Methods A retrospective, observational before-and-after exploratory study was performed on adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit using the Inpatient Critical Care Admission Order Set. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in the number of orders for scheduled acetaminophen, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), and lactated ringers at admission before implementation of the revised order set compared with after implementation. Secondary outcomes assessed clinical impact of changes made to the order set. Results The addition of a different dosing strategy for a medication already available on the order set (scheduled acetaminophen vs. as needed acetaminophen) had no impact on physician prescribing (0 vs. 0%, p = 1.000). The addition of a new medication class (an H2RA) to the order set significantly increased the number of patients prescribed an H2RA for stress ulcer prophylaxis (0 vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Rearranging the list of maintenance intravenous fluids to make lactated ringers the first fluid option in place of normal saline significantly decreased the number of orders for lactated ringers (17 vs. 4%, p = 0.005). The order set changes had no significant impact on clinical outcomes such as incidence of transaminitis, gastrointestinal bleed, and acute kidney injury. Conclusion Making changes to an admission order set can impact provider prescribing patterns. The type of change made to the order set, in addition to the specific medication changed, may have an effect on how influential the changes are on prescribing patterns.

The impact of formulary restriction on the relative consumption of carbapenems in intensive care units at an academic medical center

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1056-1058
Author(s):  
Jacob W. Pierce ◽  
Andrew Kirk ◽  
Kimberly B. Lee ◽  
John D. Markley ◽  
Amy Pakyz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Interrupted Time Series Analysis ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Formulary Restriction

AbstractAntipseudomonal carbapenems are an important target for antimicrobial stewardship programs. We evaluated the impact of formulary restriction and preauthorization on relative carbapenem use for medical and surgical intensive care units at a large, urban academic medical center using interrupted time-series analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document