scholarly journals On the Spectrum of Threshold Graphs

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Sciriha ◽  
Stephanie Farrugia

The antiregular connected graph on r vertices is defined as the connected graph whose vertex degrees take the values of r−1 distinct positive integers. We explore the spectrum of its adjacency matrix and show common properties with those of connected threshold graphs, having an equitable partition with a minimal number r of parts. Structural and combinatorial properties can be deduced for related classes of graphs and in particular for the minimal configurations in the class of singular graphs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Carolyn Reinhart

Abstract The distance matrix 𝒟(G) of a connected graph G is the matrix containing the pairwise distances between vertices. The transmission of a vertex vi in G is the sum of the distances from vi to all other vertices and T(G) is the diagonal matrix of transmissions of the vertices of the graph. The normalized distance Laplacian, 𝒟𝒧(G) = I−T(G)−1/2 𝒟(G)T(G)−1/2, is introduced. This is analogous to the normalized Laplacian matrix, 𝒧(G) = I − D(G)−1/2 A(G)D(G)−1/2, where D(G) is the diagonal matrix of degrees of the vertices of the graph and A(G) is the adjacency matrix. Bounds on the spectral radius of 𝒟 𝒧 and connections with the normalized Laplacian matrix are presented. Twin vertices are used to determine eigenvalues of the normalized distance Laplacian. The distance generalized characteristic polynomial is defined and its properties established. Finally, 𝒟𝒧-cospectrality and lack thereof are determined for all graphs on 10 and fewer vertices, providing evidence that the normalized distance Laplacian has fewer cospectral pairs than other matrices.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-225
Author(s):  
Milica Anđelić ◽  
Tamara Koledin ◽  
Zoran Stanić

Abstract We consider a particular class of signed threshold graphs and their eigenvalues. If Ġ is such a threshold graph and Q(Ġ ) is a quotient matrix that arises from the equitable partition of Ġ , then we use a sequence of elementary matrix operations to prove that the matrix Q(Ġ ) – xI (x ∈ ℝ) is row equivalent to a tridiagonal matrix whose determinant is, under certain conditions, of the constant sign. In this way we determine certain intervals in which Ġ has no eigenvalues.


Author(s):  
Agnes D. Garciano ◽  
Maria Czarina T. Lagura ◽  
Reginaldo M. Marcelo

For a simple connected graph [Formula: see text] let [Formula: see text] be a coloring of [Formula: see text] where two adjacent vertices may be assigned the same color. Let [Formula: see text] be the sum of colors of neighbors of any vertex [Formula: see text] The coloring [Formula: see text] is a sigma coloring of [Formula: see text] if for any two adjacent vertices [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] The least number of colors required in a sigma coloring of [Formula: see text] is the sigma chromatic number of [Formula: see text] and is denoted by [Formula: see text] A sigma coloring of a graph is a neighbor-distinguishing type of coloring and it is known that the sigma chromatic number of a graph is bounded above by its chromatic number. It is also known that for a path [Formula: see text] and a cycle [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] is even. Let [Formula: see text] the join of the graphs [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is not an odd cycle for any [Formula: see text]. It has been shown that if [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] then [Formula: see text]. In this study, we give necessary and sufficient conditions under which [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is the join of copies of [Formula: see text] and/or [Formula: see text] for the same value of [Formula: see text]. Let [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be positive integers with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] In this paper, we show that [Formula: see text] if and only if [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] is odd, [Formula: see text] is even and [Formula: see text]; and [Formula: see text] if and only if [Formula: see text] is even and [Formula: see text] We also obtain necessary and sufficient conditions on [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], so that [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] other than the cases [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]


Author(s):  
Saieed Akbari ◽  
Abdullah Alazemi ◽  
Milica Andjelic

The energy of a graph G, ?(G), is the sum of absolute values of the eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix. The matching number ?(G) is the number of edges in a maximum matching. In this paper, for a connected graph G of order n with largest vertex degree ? ? 6 we present two new upper bounds for the energy of a graph: ?(G) ? (n-1)?? and ?(G) ? 2?(G)??. The latter one improves recently obtained bound ?(G) ? {2?(G)?2?e + 1, if ?e is even; ?(G)(? a + 2?a + ?a-2?a), otherwise, where ?e stands for the largest edge degree and a = 2(?e + 1). We also present a short proof of this result and several open problems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Zheng-Qing Chu ◽  
Saima Nazeer ◽  
Tariq Javed Zia ◽  
Imran Ahmed ◽  
Sana Shahid

The energy of a simple connected graph G is equal to the sum of the absolute value of eigenvalues of the graph G where the eigenvalue of a graph G is the eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix AG. Ultimately, scores of various graph energies have been originated. It has been shown in this paper that the different graph energies of the regular splitting graph S′G is a multiple of corresponding energy of a given graph G.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1627-1647
Author(s):  
X. Lenin Xaviour ◽  
S. Robinson Chellathurai

A set S of vertices in a connected graph G = (V, E) is called a geodetic set if every vertex not in S lies on a shortest path between two vertices from S. A set D of vertices in G is called a dominating set of G if every vertex not in D has at least one neighbor in D. A set D is called a global dominating set in G if S is a dominating set of both G and Ḡ. A set S is called a geodetic global dominating set of G if S is both geodetic and global dominating set of G. A geodetic global dominating set S in G is called a minimal geodetic global dominating set if no proper subset of S is itself a geodetic global dominating set in G. The maximum cardinality of a minimal geodetic global dominating set in G is the upper geodetic global domination number Ῡg+(G) of G. In this paper, the upper geodetic global domination number of certain connected graphs are determined and some of the general properties are studied. It is proved that for all positive integers a, b, p where 3 ≤ a ≤ b < p, there exists a connected graph G such that Ῡg(G) = a, Ῡg+(G) = b and |V (G)| = p.


Author(s):  
V. I. Benediktovich

A graph parameter – a circumference of a graph – and its relationship with the algebraic parameters of a graph – eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix and the unsigned Laplace matrix of a graph – are considered in this article. Earlier we have obtained the lower estimates of the spectral radius of an arbitrary graph and a bipartitebalanced graph for existence of the Hamiltonian cycle in it. Recently the problem of existence of a cycle of length n – 1 in a graph depending on the values of its above-mentioned spectral radii has been investigated. This article studies the problem of existence of a cycle of length n – 2 in a graph depending on the lower estimates of the values of its spectral radius and the spectral radius of its unsigned Laplacian and the spectral conditions of existence of the circumference of a graph (2-connected graph) are obtained.


10.37236/3711 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bai Fan Chen ◽  
Ebrahim Ghorbani ◽  
Kok Bin Wong

The $(n,k)$-arrangement graph $A(n,k)$ is a graph with all the $k$-permutations of an $n$-element set as vertices where two $k$-permutations are adjacent if they agree in exactly $k-1$ positions. We introduce a cyclic decomposition for $k$-permutations and show that this gives rise to a very fine equitable partition of $A(n,k)$. This equitable partition can be employed to compute the complete set of eigenvalues (of the adjacency matrix) of $A(n,k)$. Consequently, we determine the eigenvalues of $A(n,k)$ for small values of $k$. Finally, we show that any eigenvalue of the Johnson graph $J(n,k)$ is an eigenvalue of $A(n,k)$ and that $-k$ is the smallest eigenvalue of $A(n,k)$ with multiplicity ${\cal O}(n^k)$ for fixed $k$.


Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinkar Das ◽  
Marjan Matejic ◽  
Emina Milovanovic ◽  
Igor Milovanovic

LetG = (V,E) be a simple connected graph of order n (?2) and size m, where V(G) = {1, 2,..., n}. Also let ? = d1 ? d2 ?... ? dn = ? > 0, di = d(i), be a sequence of its vertex degrees with maximum degree ? and minimum degree ?. The symmetric division deg index, SDD, was defined in [D. Vukicevic, Bond additive modeling 2. Mathematical properties of max-min rodeg index, Croat. Chem. Acta 83 (2010) 261- 273] as SDD = SDD(G) = ?i~j d2i+d2j/didj, where i~j means that vertices i and j are adjacent. In this paper we give some new bounds for this topological index. Moreover, we present a relation between topological indices of graph.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 812-826
Author(s):  
Alexander Farrugia ◽  
Irene Sciriha

A universal adjacency matrix U of a graph G is a linear combination of the 0–1 adjacency matrix A, the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees D, the identity matrix I and the matrix J each of whose entries is 1. A main eigenvalue of U is an eigenvalue having an eigenvector that is not orthogonal to the all–ones vector. It is shown that the number of distinct main eigenvalues of U associated with a simple graph G is at most the number of orbits of any automorphism of G. The definition of a U–controllable graph is given using control–theoretic techniques and several necessary and sufficient conditions for a graph to be U–controllable are determined. It is then demonstrated that U–controllable graphs are asymmetric and that the converse is false, showing that there exist both regular and non–regular asymmetric graphs that are not U–controllable for any universal adjacency matrix U. To aid in the discovery of these counterexamples, a gamma–Laplacian matrix L(gamma) is used, which is a simplified form of U. It is proved that any U-controllable graph is a L(gamma)–controllable graph for some parameter gamma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document