Subversión de la Palabra en Psicoanálisis. / Subversion of the Word in Psychoanalysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 69-94
Author(s):  
Bernardo Cabezas P.
Keyword(s):  
Logical Analysis ◽  
The Political ◽  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Political Field ◽  
Ernesto Laclau ◽  
Slavoj Žižek ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Metaphysics Of Presence ◽  
The One ◽  
Intrinsic Flaw

El trabajo realiza una lectura al concepto de la palabra plena en Lacan, problematizando su inscripción dentro de la metafísica de la presencia. Amparada en concepciones como la de Slavoj Zizek respecto de la universalidad concreta hegeliana, esta lectura intenta destrabar este concepto de esta solidaridad imputada y de este modo reanalizar sus consecuencias políticas y clínicas. De este modo, se problematiza el vinculo de este concepto con el constructivismo y, sosteniendo más bien una falla intrínseca en el edificio ontológico, se lo asocia con la concepción del acto analítico. Por último, las consecuencias de este análisis son relacionadas y distinguidas respecto de la concepción del campo político presente en Ernesto Laclau, para lo cual se recurre al análisis lógico de Gödel y a la dialéctica de la fe Kierkegaardiana. The work presents a reading on the concept of full word in Lacan, problematizing its inscription within metaphysics of presence. Based on conceptions such as the one of Slavoj Zizek about the concrete universality, this reading tries to unlock this imputed solidarity and thus reanalyze its political and clinical consequences. In this way, the link between this concept and the constructivism is problematized and, claiming rather an intrinsic flaw in the ontological edifice, it is associated with the conception of the analytic act. Finally, the implications of this analysis are related to and distinguished from the conception of the political field present in Ernesto Laclau, for this is resorted the logical analysis of Gödel and Kierkegaard’s dialectic of faith.

Borat, Multiculturalism,Mnogonatsional'nost

Slavic Review ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Final Part ◽  
Jewish American ◽  
Third Way ◽  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Slavoj Žižek ◽  
History Of ◽  
The One

In this article, Sacha Baron Cohen'sBoratappears as just the latest in a decades- long exchange between American and Soviet models of minority uplift: on the one side, civil rights and multiculturalism; on the other,druzhba narodov(the friendship of peoples) andmnogonatsional'nost’(multi-national- ness). Steven S. Lee argues diat, with Borat, multiculturalism seems to have emerged as the victor in this exchange, but that the film also hearkens to a not-too-distant Soviet alternative. Part 1 shows how Borat gels with recent leftist critiques of multiculturalism, spearheaded by Slovenian philosopher Slavoj żižek. Part 2 relates Borat to a largely submerged history of American minorities drawing hope from mnogonatsional'nost', as celebrated in Grigorii Aleksandrov's 1936 filmCircus.The final part presents Borat as choosing neither multiculturalism nor mnogonatsional'nost', but rather the continued opposition of the two, if not a “third way.” For a glimpse of what this might look like, the paper concludes with a discussion ofAbsurdistan(2006) by Soviet Jewish American novelist Gary Shteyngart.

To what question is the Badiouan notion of the subject an answer? On the dialectical elaboration of the concept in his early work

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-120
Author(s):  
Jan-Jasper Persijn
Keyword(s):  
Direct Consequence ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Political ◽  
Academic World ◽  
Systematic Account ◽  
Political Field ◽  
Political Implications ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The One ◽  
Work Up

Alain Badiou’s elaboration of a subject faithful to an event is commonly known today in the academic world and beyond. However, his first systematic account of the subject ( Théorie du Sujet) was already published in 1982 and did not mention the ‘event’ at all. Therefore, this article aims at tracing back both the structural and the historical conditions that directed Badiou’s elaboration of the subject in the early work up until the publication of L’Être et l’Événément in 1988. On the one hand, it investigates to what extent the (early) Badiouan subject can be considered an exceptional product of the formalist project of the Cahiers pour l’Analyse as instigated by psychoanalytical discourse (Lacan) and a certain Marxist discourse (Althusser) insofar as both were centered upon a theory of the subject. On the other hand, this article examines the radical political implications of this subject insofar as Badiou has directed his philosophical aims towards the political field as a direct consequence of the events of May ’68.

scholarly journals Neomarxismos e Teoria do Discurso: diálogos e embates entre Ernesto Laclau e Slavoj Žižek

Em Tese ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Zeidan Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Ernesto Laclau ◽  
Slavoj Žižek

O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar os principais elementos que compõem as teorizações sobre o discurso político presentes no pensamento de Ernesto Laclau e Slavoj Žižek para, a partir disso, delinear alguns dos diálogos e embates que suas posições suscitaram no que diz respeito ao discurso político e à prática política.

scholarly journals LA IMPOSTURA POSTMARXISTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Cinatti
Keyword(s):  
Judith Butler ◽  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Ernesto Laclau ◽  
Slavoj Žižek ◽  
Movimientos Sociales

En el libro de reciente publicación en español Contingencia, hegemonía, universalidad. Diálogos contemporáneos en la izquierda, Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau y Slavoj Zizek, proponen un intercambio de ideas teórico-políticas que pretende dilucidar las coordenadas de una nueva "subjetividad radical" emergente de las articulaciones políticas en el campo de los movimientos sociales y sus luchas reivindicativas de los últimos años. A pesar de las diferencias notables en los enfoques teóricos y de las discusiones políticas más encendidas entre Laclau y Zizek, el punto de partida y de llegada del debate no ofrece otro horizonte más que la búsqueda de "formas radicales de la democracia que tratan de comprender los procesos de representación a través de los cuales procede la articulación política, el problema de la identificación -y sus fracasos necesarios- a través del cual tiene lugar la movilización política, la cuestión del futuro tal como surge para los marcos teóricos que insisten en la fuerza productiva de lo negativo"

The Universalist Dimensions of Antagonism

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-74
Author(s):  
Ilan Kapoor
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
The Other ◽  
Global Politics ◽  
Refugee Crisis ◽  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Slavoj Žižek ◽  
The Subject ◽  
European Refugee Crisis ◽  
The One

This chapter focuses on two recent controversies in which Slavoj Žižek has been embroiled — the European refugee crisis and the issue of Eurocentrism — to illustrate the two universalist dimensions of antagonism. The two controversies are, of course, directly pertinent to international development, since the one (the refugee crisis) is closely entwined with North–South relations and the global politics of inequality, while the other (Eurocentrism) is a key cause of concern for those (postcolonial, decolonial) development theorists and practitioners focusing on continuing patterns of Western domination. Žižek's stand on both issues has been the subject of notable disapproval, if not denunciation. Critics reproach him for being Eurocentric and even racist, charges which he has repeatedly countered. The chapter examines the differing theoretical and political positions in these debates, underlining what Žižek's critics miss or misunderstand about the key notion of antagonism.

scholarly journals Objetividad y discurso en las ontologías de Laclau y Žižek: controversias entre la abundancia y la falta

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. e024
Author(s):  
Miguel David Reartes
Keyword(s):  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Ernesto Laclau ◽  
Slavoj Žižek

En este trabajo intentaremos reconstruir la noción de discurso de Ernesto Laclau, buscando con ello dar cuenta del modo en que se configura el registro de la objetividad en de las distintas etapas de su propuesta teórica. Al mismo tiempo, buscaremos establecer un contrapunto entre la perspectiva de Laclau y el abordaje que realiza Slavoj Žižek de esta misma dimensión. Intentaremos inscribir el debate entre ambos autores en el marco de la distinción formulada por Tønder y Thomassen entre las ontologías de la falta y las ontologías de la abundancia, con el objetivo de indagar en torno a algunas de las controversias que atraviesan al proyecto teórico de Laclau en su intento por articular ambas orientaciones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document