scholarly journals The Investment in Fixed Assets Before and After the Global Financial Crisis (Empirical Study for Industry and Investment Sector in Palestine Stock Exchange)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Tamer Bahjat Sabri
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Investment In Fixed Assets ◽  
Shed Light

This paper seeks to shed light on investment in fixed assets before and after the financial crisis that took place in 2008 and compare the two periods together in the sectors of industry and investment in Palestine Stock Exchange. The period between 2005 – 2007 was chosen to represent to the pre-crisis time and the period between 2010 -2012 was chosen to represent the post-crisis time. The population of the study consists of fifteen organizations from both sectors. To test the hypothesis of the study, the independent samples T-test was employed.The average ratio of fixed assets to the total assets of industry and investment rose from 56.2% before the crisis to 58.5% after the crisis. As for the hypotheses of the study, the findings showed no difference except for the seventh hypothesis. There was a statically significant difference in the ratio of fixed assets to equity between the listed companies that a high return on assets and those that have a low return.

Global Financial Crisis and Bank Productivity in Mexico

2015 ◽  
pp. 581-599
Author(s):  
Francisco Vargas Serrano ◽  
Luis Rentería Guerrero ◽  
Gang Cheng ◽  
Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos ◽  
Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Malmquist Index ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Domestic Banks ◽  
Productivity Indicators ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis

This chapter presents an attempt to compare the productivity of the Mexican banking sector in two different periods: the 2007-2011 period of global financial crisis and the 2003-2006 stage, which can be regarded as a relatively stable period. The purpose of this study is to disclose whether the global financial crisis affected Mexican banking productivity. Three Data Envelopment Models (DEA) are tested in order to assess whether there is a significant difference between the productivity patterns of Mexican banks before and after the financial crisis. Such models are the radial Malmquist Index, the non-radial and slacks-based model, and non-radial and non-oriented. Essentially, no significant difference of productivity indicators for both foreign and domestic banks was found. Likewise, no significant difference between the pre- and post-crisis periods was perceived, as far as productivity indicators are concerned. Therefore, the global financial crisis was effectless in banking operation.

scholarly journals Remuneration policy and corporate governance: Story from Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Singapore, Australia, and United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 614-620
Author(s):  
Agung Nur Probohudono ◽  
Payamta Payamta
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis

Objective - Remuneration becomes an interesting research project since the occurrence of global financial crisis in the world’s economic. Remuneration relates to the corporate governance issues as well as agency theory. The objective of this research is to test the factors affecting remuneration in 6 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Singapore, Australia, and United States). Design/ Methodology/ Approach - The research takes samples from 929 manufacturing companies on the list of stock exchange in 6 Countries during 2010 up to 2013 by using purposive judgment sampling. The years are chosen considering those are the years when the companies in those 6 countries underwent a recovery from the global financial crisis impact. Result - There are significant differences in remuneration distribution between the companies with compensation committe or those without. Country/the company location in several ways could give significant difference related to remuneration distribution. Surprisingly, Company size and Compensation committee give negative effect towards remuneration distribution.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND FINANCIAL STRUCTURE ON FIRM PERFORMANCE (An Empirical Study of The Financial Crisis 2008 and 2009 in Indonesia)

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-223
Author(s):  
Cressya Cesia Ansca C. Ansca ◽  
◽  
Kevin A. Suyapto ◽  
Titin Pranoto ◽  
Vania P. Gunawan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Accounting Performance ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis ◽  
The Impact

Abstract This research aims to identify the impact of capital structure on Indonesian firms’ performance, particularly on the magnitude of impact at the period prior to crisis, crisis, and the period following the crisis that happened in 2008. The Global Financial Crisis grants a chance to scrutinize the impact of crisis between capital structure and firm performance. Proxies used for capital structure are total debt to total assets, short-term debt to total assets, and long-term debt to total assets ratio. Moreover, firm performance is measured by accounting performance (Return on Asset and Return on Equity) and market performance (Price to Equity Ratio and Tobin’s Q). Samples used include all firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from the period 2004 up to 2017, excluding financial sector firms. This research posits that capital structure generally impacts firm performance negatively. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) that happened in 2008 serves a greater negative impact of capital structure to firm performance than it is before and after crisis. This research is intended for use by firms as a perusal in managing its capital structure, for creditors in managing its lending, and for investors in investing, prominently in times of financial crisis.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN PERBANKAN NASIONAL SEBELUM, DAN SESUDAH KRISIS KEUANGAN GLOBAL

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syamsu Alam
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Ratio Analysis ◽  
Paired Samples ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis

AbstrackThe  research  aims  to  find  out  the  comparison  of  national  banking  performance  before  and  after  the  globalfinancial crisis and its also to find out whether there is a significant difference betweenthe performance beforeand after the crisis. The analysis of different test which was used was paired samples test.The data used in theresearch were one year data obtained before the crisis (2007), and one year after the crisis (2009). The toolsofanalysis used were probability ratio analysis i.e. ROA, ROE and the liquidity ratio i.e. LDR.This results revealthat there is a significant difference in bank performance before and after the global financial crisis. Besides,the  bank  having  highest  performance  in  2007  is  PT  BTPN. And  in  2009,  the  bank  having  the  highestperformance based on ROA is PT BCA, the one based on ROE is PT BRI, and the one based on LDR is PTBank Permata.Penelitian  ini  bertujuan  untuk  meneliti   perbadingan  kinerja  perbankan  nasional  sebelum  dan  sesudah  krisiskeuangan global juga untuk mengetahui bank yang memiliki kinerja paling tinggi masa sebelum, dan sesudahkrisis keuangan global . Penelitian ini lebih lanjut mengenai ada tidaknya perbedaan yang signifikan pada masasebelum  dengan  sesudah  krisis  keuangan  global.  Analisis  uji  beda  yang  digunakan  adalah  uji  paired  sampeltest.Data  yang  digunakan  dalam  penelitian  ini  adalah  data  satu  tahun  sebelum  krisis  (2007),  dan  satu  tahunsesudah krisis(2009). Adapun alat analisis yang digunakan yaitu analisis rasio profitrabilitas yaitu ROA, ROEdan  rasio  likuiditas  yaitu  LDR.Dari  penelitian  ini  ditemukan  perbedaan  signifikan  kinerja  bank  sebelum  dansesudah  krisis  keuangan  global.  Juga  ditemukan  pada  tahun  2007   bank  yang  memiliki  kinerja  paling  tinggiyaitu PT BTPN. Dan pada tahun 2009 berdasarkan ROA yaitu PT BCA, dilihat dari ROE yaitu PT BRI, danLDR yaitu PT Bank Permata.Kata Kunci: Kinerja keuangan, ROA, ROE, LDR, Perbankan Nasional dan Krisis keuangan global

scholarly journals A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-188
Author(s):  
Sunitha Devi ◽  
I Gede Arya Wigarba ◽  
Nyoman Trisna Herawati ◽  
I Nyoman Putra Yasa
Keyword(s):  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Banking Industry ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Bank System

Economic activities ascending from the use of PSAK 55 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards) are alleged to be the cause of the Indonesian bank system instability when facing the global financial crisis in 2008. PSAK 55 results in CKPN (allowance for impairment losses) allocation on a procyclical nature. Therefore, it is expected that   PSAK 71 implementation avoids procyclical CKPN that does not reflect sustainable financial performance. The current study is conducted to test the effectiveness of PSAK 71 implementation in hindering procyclical and credit crunch mitigation. The study’s population is the banking industry listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2020. The data are then descriptively analyzed using descriptive analysis and the Wilcoxon Rank Test. The findings show that: 1) there is a significant difference in CKPN between PSAK 55 and PSAK 71 implementations, with no significant difference in the CAR and profit values, 2) there is no significant difference in the CKPN value applied based on PSAK 71 before and after entering the COVID-19 pandemic, and 3) there are significant differences in credit disbursement during the 2008 crisis and the 2020 crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document