scholarly journals The Development of Teacher Development Innovation for Enhancing Students’ Learning Achievement in Rajaprajanugroh 50 School under the Office of Special Education Administration

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Narongrat Choktanaprasit ◽  
Chalard Chantarasombat ◽  
Pha Agsonsua

The objectives of this research were to: 1) create and specify the achievement goal of developing the innovation for enhancing the learning achievement of schools, 2) develop the potentiality of teachers and educational staffs in enhancing learning achievement of schools with the application of the ESC in coaching and mentoring, 3) monitor and enhance learning achievement of schools, The development and participatory action research were employed through the application of ESC. Research tools consisted of the learning activity package, teaching observation forms, narrative recording form, lesson plan analysis recording form, teaching reflection recording form, and criteria of activity implementation. Statistics used were percentage, mean, standard deviation, effectiveness index and the statistics in hypothesis testing. The results revealed that: 1) The school performed learning transformation project to enhance students’ learning achievement in terms of memorandum of cooperation with the networking schools. 2) The results of the overall development of the potential of teachers and school administrators showed: (1) the efficiency of both activities and tests were 90.96/81.02 which were higher than the committed standard 80/80, (2) the effectiveness index after training was higher than before at 0.7480 showing an increase of knowledge of 74.80%, (3) the mean score of after training was significantly higher than before at the level of 0.01, and (4) there were no statistically significant differences in mean scores on learning retention. 3) The monitoring performance of co-researchers showed the increase in knowledge, practicing, and feeling. 4) The Professional Learning Community building started up with (1) collaboration of all stakeholders, (2) studying and analyzing information, (3) specifying target and indicator, (4) planning and building up a network, (5) presenting learning co-design, (6) trying out innovation after the ESC actions, and (7) sharing the ESC in the school and school network. 

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207
Author(s):  
Georgia Hodges ◽  
Sophia Jeong ◽  
Peggy McKay ◽  
Tom Robertson ◽  
David Ducrest

Creating partnerships that leverage skill sets from universities and corporate entities to improve STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education is often discussed in theory. However, examples of successful models that might inform practice are scarce. This article describes how one STEM business, university educators, and middle school administrators and teachers successfully developed and implemented an integrated STEM education (iSTEM) experience for all eighth-grade students at a local middle school. We created a professional learning community to establish the goals and vision for the iSTEM day, which included the use of instructionally sound pedagogical methods, intellectually stimulating learning experiences, and a deeply developed understanding of the school context. Our team successfully completed a one-day learning experience that focused on the fundamental concept of osmosis and problem-solving skills. However, the broader impacts of this day included a new collaborative network between the university, the company, and the middle school that remains intact and productive.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Kovit Vajarintarangoon ◽  
Phaophongphat Bunkanan ◽  
Sittichai Deelon ◽  
Sripen Poldech ◽  
Kittiwat Thauyngam

The purposes of the research study were to a) study the current situation of school management and administration using professional learning community b) to develop professional learning community for the school administrators and c) follow up collaborative practice among school colleagues and administrators within school using professional learning community in Buriram Province. The researcher utilized focused interview sessions, group interview questionnaires, and Professional Learning observation within school to determine how the school colleagues perceived the implementation of professional learning communities. The results indicated that: 1) A school’s PLC isn’t working, common problems in Buriram Province include: a) Personal practice, b) Insufficient collaborative work, 3) Academics support, and 4) supportive conditions. 2) School administrators' competencies development after implementation of PLC workshop have an influence on process of using PLC in school. School administrators' competencies included supportive conditions for safe environment of PLC, creating environment that support learning collaboratively and respect for individual differences and developing collegial relationships for planning, following up of supervision process through action planning that support collaborative work among school colleagues. 3) Model of school administrators' competencies development in Buriram Province were a) a PDCA model incorporated with contemplative education that driven through small group of PLCs. This model utilized school administrators as coach and mentor to reflect on co-operation of group problem solving in the same group c) a PLC comprised of school teachers, coming together by grade level, content area, or through an interdisciplinary group. The purpose of a PLC was to build a community of teachers to focus on a common goal or objective collaboratively.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Melissa J. Poole

The goal of this study was to examine the development of a group of preservice teachers over three semesters during the second phase of their coursework and fieldwork in the teacher development program at a major Midwestern university. The questions at the heart of the study were whether this cohort of preservice teachers developed community. What markers of community were evidenced? What contextual factors served to support or impede the development of community? Data were collected through observation of their courses, a series of interviews with a sample of preservice teachers, and archiving artifacts of their coursework such as the course syllabi, reading materials, and their discussions online. Data analysis was grounded in theory about the nature of community, communities of practice, teacher communities, online communities and in a sociocultural theory of technological change. The findings suggest that these preservice teachers began to form community during their years in the teacher development program. This community began to evolve from a community of practice into a professional learning community as they developed from college students into practicing teachers. However, the culture of the classroom, the physical arrangement of the room and the importance given to students' voices in class and online, played a large role in fostering and supporting the development of community.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Jedsada Janpleng ◽  
Karn Ruangmontri

The purpose of this study was to study the elements of the teacher development system in learning management according to the concept of Education 4.0 with a professional learning community process in secondary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission by studying the components of the teacher development system in learning management according to the concept of education 4.0 with a professional learning community process from 7 experts, consisting of 1) two people in higher education administration, 2) one person who has a stake in learning management, 3) two school directors, and 4) two teaching specialist teachers. The sample group was obtained by using a specific selection method using the teacher development system component assessment in learning management according to the concept of education 4.0 with a professional learning community process in secondary schools, under the Office of the Basic Education Commission, which is a 5-level rating scale. System Components Teacher development in learning management According to the educational model 4.0 with a professional learning community process in secondary schools, under the Office of the Basic Education Commission, there are 4 main components, 13 subcomponents, namely; 1) The inputs consist of (1) executives, (2) learning management courses, (3) teachers, (4) resources that support learning management. 2) The process consists of (1) Identifying challenging problems, (2) Concept finding stage, (3) Planning and development stage, (4) Testing and evaluation stage, (5) Presenting results to society. 3) Productivity consists of (1) Teachers have knowledge and understanding of learning management, (2) Teachers are competent in learning management. 4) feedback, which consists of (1) reporting on results and (2) improvements, corrections, and developments. And, the experts assess the suitability of the elements at a high and highest level and have consistent opinions on all components..


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Chalard Chantarasombat ◽  
Ekanun Sombatsakulkit

The purposes of this study were to: 1) create and develop effective doctoral learning module on leading teachers development program to enhance critical thinking for students in secondary schools under the Office of Basic Education Commission, and 2) evaluate the developed module on its efficiency and effectiveness- its congruence of utility, possibility, and appropriateness, learning achievement of learners, learning retention, and the learners’ satisfaction. Samples were 20 Doctoral degree students in Educational Administration and Development and Leadership program, Northeastern University, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. Statistics used were percentage, mean, standard deviation, effectiveness index, and t-test. The results were: 1) The developed module on learning activity management of leading teachers in simulation situation had 9 Modules: (1.1) Survey of former experience (1.2) Collaboration in planning (1.3) The development of creative teacher conception (1.4) The application of thinking approach (1.5) Practice in classroom (1.6) Supervision, follow up, and evaluation (1.7) Feedback and reinforcement (1.8) Seminar for enhancing strength, and (1.9) Reflection learning. 2) The efficiency and effectiveness of the developed module were: (2.1) The efficiency of 86.53 (E1) /83.29 (E2) which were higher than the committed 80/80 standard, (2.2) The congruence of utility, possibility, and appropriateness were in the highest level ( = 4.69, SD = 0.42), (2.3) The effectiveness index was 0.7397 which meant students gained more knowledge of 73.97%, (2.4) The students had significantly higher learning achievement after learning via the module at the level of 0.05, (2.5) There was no significant differences of learning achievement between after learning and after learning for two weeks which mean the students’ learning retention, and (2.6) The students had satisfaction on the developed module in the highest level ( = 4.52, SD = 0.41).


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Widias Rahayuni

Nowadays, the government with its policy of inclusion class made teacher must be able to do learning activity for children with special need. This research was aimed to describe about (1) teachers’ competence in planning of learning for children with special need (CSN), (2) teachers’ competence in doing learning activity for CSN, (3) teachers’ competence in evaluating learning achievement of CSN, (4) teachers’ competence in managing the class at integration process for CSN and normal children in the same class. This research method used descriptive qualitative approach. These research objects were integration class teacher of class 1, class teacher of CSN handler, headmaster of SD Negeri 1 Tanjung. The technique of collecting data in this research used observation, interview, and document. The technique of data analysis used descriptive qualitative. The research result showed that (1)teachers’ competence in the planning of learning for children with special need (CSN) showed two different results between teacher of integration class and teacher of CSN handler, that was in preparing the lesson plan, teacher of the integration class used provided lesson plan and this was applied both to normal student and CSN, yet teacher of CSN prepared batter and conicallu by making PPI for CSN in SD Negeri 1 Tanjung, (2) teachers’ competence in doing learning activity for CSN was in quite a good category as equalized the right if giving learning service between normal student and CSN, and teacher mostly used media in teaching learning process, (3) teachers’ competence in evaluating learning achievement of CSN was based on the competence of CSN, thus teachers didn’t have specific criteria as the standard for determining the development of CSN (4 )teachers’ competence in managing the integration class was able to manage and there was good cooperation between teacher of integration class and teacher of CSN, thus this was good cooperation between teacher of integration class and teacher of CSN, thus this was able to solve the problems in teaching learning process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Ishii

Active learning is an innovation of teaching and learning and strongly connected to teacher education reform. A teacher’s role in a knowledge-based society is being shifted from a knowledge teller to a facilitator. It is diï¬cult to shift a teacher’s perspective from “how to teach” to “how students learn.” However, through a collaborative lesson study, teachers can discuss students’ learning in a classroom. The university can function as a facilitator to cultivate a professional learning community. This paper discusses the practice of active learning in teacher training at the University of Fukui in Japan. The faculty provides active learning for prospective teachers to engage collaboratively in scientific inquiry using physics by inquiry. Based on the viewpoint that teacher development is a continuous, lifelong process, and the teacher is a reï¬ective practitioner, teacher training should also be an active, lifelong endeavor. Moreover, the system and structure of the lesson study and collaborative reï¬ection promote a professional learning community. Both pre-service and in-service teachers develop pedagogical content knowledge through repeated practice and reï¬ection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1464
Author(s):  
Gusti Ayu Rai Tirta ◽  
Prabowo Prabowo ◽  
Sunu Kuntjoro

This study aims to produce physics teachinginstruments with cooperative learning model type group investigation to improve students self-efficacy and learning achievement. Development of teachinginstrumentsusing Kemp model. The experimental design uses a one-pretest-posttest design model with three time replications. Subjects in this study are teachinginstruments and students of class XI MIPA. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 3 Singaraja-Bali in the academic year of 2017/2018. Data were collected using validation method, questionnaire, observation, questionnaire and test. Data analysis techniques used are qualitative descriptive analysis and parametric statistical analysis. The results showed that the developed teachingintruments were valid, practical, and effective.The validitywas indicated by the average scores in a good categoryforlesson plan, BAS, student worksheet, achievement test and self-efficacy questionnaire.The practicisibilitywas showed by: (a) a good implementation of the lesson plan, (b) student activity is in excellent category, (c) the readability of BAS and student worksheet are in moderate categories, and (d) the obstacles during the learning activities can be overcome.The effectiveness was indicated by: (a) students’ learning achievement has increased significantly; (b) students’ self-efficacy has increased significantly; and (c) students respond is positive to the learning instruments and learning activity.  In conclusion, physics learning instruments with cooperative learning model type group investigation can be used to improve students’ self-efficacy and learning achievement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document