scholarly journals Impact of physical parameterization schemes on the numerical simulation of Orissa Super Cyclone (1999)

MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
D. K. TRIVEDI ◽  
P. MUKHOPADHYAY ◽  
S. S. VAIDYA

& 29 vDrwcj] 1999 dks mM+hlk esa vk, egkpØokr dks izfr:fir djus ds fy, isuflyosfu;k LVsV ;wfuoflZVh ds jk"Vªh; ok;qeaMyh; vuqla/kku dsUnz ds eslksLdsy ekWMy ¼,e- ,e- 5½ ds xSj&nzoLFkSfrd :ikarj dk mi;ksx fd;k x;k gSA pØokr ds ekxZ vkSj mlds fodkl ij dSu&fÝ’k] csV~l&feyj] xzsy vkSj ,aFksl&dqvks uked pkj diklh izkpyhdj.k Ldheksa rFkk gk¡x&iSu vkSj cdZ FkkWEilu uked nks xzgh; ifjlhek Lrj izkpyhdj.k ¼ih- ch- ,y-½ Ldheks ds izHkko dk v/;;u djus ds fy, iz;ksx fd, x, gSA pØokr dh xfr] U;wure nkc dk fodkl] o"kkZ dk iSVuZ vkSj rkieku ds m/okZ/kj ØkWl lsD’ku ds laca/k esa laosnu’khyrk dh tk¡p dh xbZ gSA ,aFksl&dqvks Ldhe dks NksM+dj vU; lHkh izfr:i.k vfr {kh.k ifjlapj.k ls vfr izpaM pØokrh; rwQku fodflr djus esa l{ke gSaA U;wure dsUnzh; nkc dk cuuk fofHkUu diklh Ldheksa esa vf/kd laosnu’khyrk n’kkZrk gS ftlesa lekdyu vof/k ds 4 fnuksa ds nkSjku dSu&fÝ’k Ldhe ls 966 gS- ik- vkSj ,aFksl&dqvks Ldhe ls 1004 gS- ik- jghA izfr:fir pØokr dh xfr ij fofHkUu diklh izkpyhdj.k Ldheksa dk egRoiw.kZ izHkko jgk gSA blls izkIr gq, ifj.kkeksa ls irk pyk gS fd dSu&fÝ’k vkSj gk¡x&iSu dh feyh tqyh Ldheksa ls pØokr ds U;wure dsUnzh; nkc dk fodkl vkSj iouksa dh {kSfrt ,oa m/okZ/kj lajpukvksa] rkieku folaxfr;ksa vkSj jsucSaM y{k.kksa dks vPNh rjg iznf’kZr fd;k tk ldrk gSA Non-hydrostatic version of Pennsylvania State University- National Center for Atmospheric Research mesoscale model (MM5) is used to simulate the super cyclonic storm that crossed Orissa coast on 29 October, 1999. Experiments are carried out with four cumulus parameterization schemes namely; Kain-Fritsch, Betts-Miller, Grell and Anthes-Kuo and two planetary boundary layer parameterization (PBL) schemes namely; Hong-Pan and Burk-Thompson to study their impact on the movement and development of the cyclone. The sensitivity is examined in terms of movement, evolution of minimum pressure, rainfall pattern and vertical cross section of temperature. All the simulations are able to develop the very severe cyclonic storm from very weak circulation except with Anthes-Kuo scheme. The evolution of the minimum central pressure shows much sensitivity among the different cumulus schemes with Kain-Fritsch producing 966 hPa while Anthes-Kuo 1004 hPa during the 4 days of the integration period. Different cumulus parameterization schemes show significant impact on the simulated movement of the cyclone. The results reveal that the evolution of minimum central pressure and horizontal as well as vertical structures of winds, temperature anomalies and rainband characteristic to a cyclone are well brought out by the combination of Kain-Fritsch and Hong-Pan schemes.

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.N. Ahasan ◽  
M. A. M. Chowdhury ◽  
D.A. Quadir

The sensitivity test of parameterization schemes for prediction of summer monsoon high impact rainfallevents (HIRE) over Bangladesh has been performed using the Fifth-Generation PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model(MM5) conducting six historical HIRE cases. The MM5 model was run on triple-nested domains at 45, 15, 5 kmhorizontal resolutions using Anthes-Kuo (AK), Grell (Gr), Kain-Fritsch (KF), Betts-Miller (BM) andKain-Fritsch2 (KF2) cumulus parameterization schemes (CPS) with Medium Range Forecast (MRF) andBlackadar planetary boundary layer (PBL).The model predicted rainfall was compared both spatially andquantitatively with Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) rainfall. While parameterization options ofMM5 model have been investigated spatially for Bangladesh, Anthes-Kuo CPS with both MRF and BlackadarPBL (AKM & AKB) options of MM5 have found suitable. Quantitatively, Anthes-Kuo CPS with MRF PBL (AKM)option has calculated the better average rainfall over Bangladesh. By this way, AKM has found suitable in bothspatial and quantitaive comparisons. Thus, Anthes-Kuo CPS with MRF PBL (AKM) has considered as the bestMM5 option for prediction of summer monsoon HIRE cases over Bangladesh.The sensitivity test of parameterization schemes for prediction of summer monsoon high impact rainfall events (HIRE) over Bangladesh has been performed using the Fifth-Generation PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) conducting six historical HIRE cases. The MM5 model was run on triple-nested domains at 45, 15, 5 km horizontal resolutions using Anthes-Kuo (AK), Grell (Gr), Kain-Fritsch (KF), Betts-Miller (BM) and Kain-Fritsch2 (KF2) cumulus parameterization schemes (CPS) with Medium Range Forecast (MRF) and Blackadar planetary boundary layer (PBL).The model predicted rainfall was compared both spatially and quantitatively with Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) rainfall. While parameterization options of MM5 model have been investigated spatially for Bangladesh, Anthes-Kuo CPS with both MRF and Blackadar PBL (AKM & AKB) options of MM5 have found suitable. Quantitatively, Anthes-Kuo CPS with MRF PBL (AKM) option has calculated the better average rainfall over Bangladesh. By this way, AKM has found suitable in both spatial and quantitaive comparisons. Thus, Anthes-Kuo CPS with MRF PBL (AKM) has considered as the best MM5 option for prediction of summer monsoon HIRE cases over Bangladesh. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jme.v44i1.19496


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujata Pattanayak ◽  
U. C. Mohanty ◽  
Krishna K. Osuri

The present study is carried out to investigate the performance of different cumulus convection, planetary boundary layer, land surface processes, and microphysics parameterization schemes in the simulation of a very severe cyclonic storm (VSCS) Nargis (2008), developed in the central Bay of Bengal on 27 April 2008. For this purpose, the nonhydrostatic mesoscale model (NMM) dynamic core of weather research and forecasting (WRF) system is used. Model-simulated track positions and intensity in terms of minimum central mean sea level pressure (MSLP), maximum surface wind (10 m), and precipitation are verified with observations as provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD) and Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM). The estimated optimum combination is reinvestigated with six different initial conditions of the same case to have better conclusion on the performance of WRF-NMM. A few more diagnostic fields like vertical velocity, vorticity, and heat fluxes are also evaluated. The results indicate that cumulus convection play an important role in the movement of the cyclone, and PBL has a crucial role in the intensification of the storm. The combination of Simplified Arakawa Schubert (SAS) convection, Yonsei University (YSU) PBL, NMM land surface, and Ferrier microphysics parameterization schemes in WRF-NMM give better track and intensity forecast with minimum vector displacement error.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Yong Jung ◽  
Yuh-Lang Lin

<p class="1Body">In this study, a regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) model known as the Weather Research Forescasting (WRF) model was adopted to improve the quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) by optimizing combined microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes. Four locations in two regions (plain region for Sangkeug and Imsil; mountainous region for Dongchun and Bunchun) in Korean Peninsula were examined for QPF for two heavy rainfall events 2006 and 2008. The maximum Index of Agreement (IOA) was 0.96 at Bunchun in 2006 using the combined Thompson microphysics and the Grell cumulus parameterization schemes. Sensitivity of QPF on domain size at Sangkeug indicated that the localized smaller domain had 55% (from 0.35 to 0.90) improved precipitation accuracy based on IOA of 2008. For the July 2006 Sangkeug event, the sensitivity to cumulus parameterization schemes for precipitation prediction cannot be ignored with finer resolutions. In mountainous region, the combined Thompson microphysics and Grell cumulus parameterization schemes make a better quantitative precipitation forecast, while in plain region, the combined Thompson microphysics and Kain-Frisch cumulus parameterization schemes are the best.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document