scholarly journals Incidence of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: A retrospective population-based analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Krzysztof Rudzinski ◽  
Jun Kawakami
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Prophylactic Regimen ◽  
Community Resistance ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: We have seen an increased risk of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). Fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics are common for prophylaxis prior to TRUS-PB. We evaluate whether increasing FQ resistance correlates with increased incidence of post-biopsy infectious complications at our institution.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart and electronic health record review on 927 patients who underwent TRUS-PB between January and July of 2012 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. We prospectively collected the following variables: age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen, and date of biopsy. We documented presentation to an emergency department within 30 days of TRUS-PB for infectious and non-infectious complications.Results: Of the 927 patients, 58 patients (6.3%) were admitted to the emergency department due to post-TRUS-PB complications within 30 days post-biopsy. The most common infectious complications were sepsis in 21 patients (2.2%), followed by urinary tract infection (UTI) in 9 (0.9%), and prostatitis in 4 (0.4%). We found that 83% of the septic episodes and 66.6% of the UTIs were attributed to ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli). The incidence of non-infectious complications was as follows: urinary retention in 12 (1.2%), hematuria in 9 (0.9%), and rectal bleeding in 8 (0.8%).Conclusion: Our results suggest an increased incidence of infectious complications caused by FQ resistant organisms following TRUS-PB. This finding could be attributed to increasing community resistance to ciprofloxacin. The current antimicrobial prophylactic regimen needs to be re-evaluated, and a novel approach may need to be considered.

scholarly journals Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in patients with prostate biopsy Gleason score ≤6

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasmet Sarici ◽  
Onur Telli ◽  
Orhan Yigitbasi ◽  
Musa Ekici ◽  
Berat Cem Ozgur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Biopsy Gleason Score

Introduction: The discrepancy between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason scores is common. We investigate the predictive value of prostate biopsy features for predicting Gleason score (GS) upgrading in patients with biopsy Gleason scores ≤6 who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Our aim was to determine predictors of GS upgrading and to offer guidance to clinicians in determining the therapeutic option.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer at 2 major centres between January 2007 and March 2013. All patients with either abnormal digital examination or elevated prostate-specific antigen at screening underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Variables were evaluated among the patients with and without GS upgrading. Our study limitations include its retrospective design, the fact that all subjects were Turkish and the fact that we had a small sample size.Results: In total, 321 men had GS ≤6 on prostate biopsy. Of these, 190 (59.2%) had GS ≤6 concordance and 131 (40.8%) had GS upgrading from ≤6 on biopsy to 7 or higher at the time of the prostatectomy. Independent predictors of pathological upgrading were prostate volume <40 cc (p < 0.001), maximum percent of cancer in any core (p = 0.011), and >1 core positive for cancer (p < 0.001).Conclusions: When obtaining an extended-core biopsy scheme, patients with small prostates (≤40 cc), greater than 1 core positive for cancer, and an increased burden of cancer are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading. Patients with GS ≤6 on biopsy with these pathological parameters should be carefully counselled on treatment decisions.

scholarly journals Addition of Ceftriaxone and Amikacin to a Ciprofloxacin plus Metronidazole Regimen for Preventing Infectious Complications of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad-Hossein Izadpanahi ◽  
Kia Nouri-Mahdavi ◽  
Seyed Mahmood Majidi ◽  
Mohammad-Hatef Khorrami ◽  
Farshid Alizadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Prophylactic Regimen ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group 1

Background. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding single doses of ceftriaxone and amikacin to a ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole regimen on the reduction of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS Bx). Materials and Methods. Four hundred and fifty patients who were candidates for TRUS Bx were divided into two groups of 225 each. The control group received ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally every 12 hours together with metronidazole 500 mg orally every 8 hours from the day prior to the procedure until the fifth postoperative day. In the second group, single doses of ceftriaxone 1 g by intravenous infusion and amikacin 5 mg/kg intramuscularly were administered 30–60 minutes before TRUS Bx in addition to the oral antimicrobials described for group 1. The incidence of infection was compared between the groups. Results. The incidence of infectious complications in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.6% versus 0.9%, p=0.017). Conclusion. The addition of single doses of intramuscular amikacin and intravenously infused ceftriaxone to our prophylactic regimen of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole resulted in a statistically significant reduction of infectious complications following TRUS Bx.

scholarly journals Single Dose of Levofloxacin versus Three Dosages for Prophylaxis in Prostate Biopsy

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Linden-Castro ◽  
Marcela Pelayo-Nieto ◽  
Alejandro Alias-Melgar ◽  
Fernando Carreño-de la Rosa
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Prophylactic Regimen ◽  
Local Pain ◽  
Number Of Patients

Transrectal ultrasound-guided core prostate biopsy is a key event in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, transient side events such as local pain, haematuria, haematospermia, dysuria, and rectal bleeding are reported in a large number of patients. Antimicrobial agents lower the incidence of postbiopsy infectious complications. The timing and duration of the regimen and the route of administration remain controversial. We developed a standard prophylactic regimen, in which safety and efficiency were maximized, while costs and variability were minimized. Accordingly we prospectively evaluated 425 consecutive patients, who underwent outpatient transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy after a single dose versus three doses of levofloxacin.

scholarly journals Quinolone Prophylaxis in Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: An Eight-Year Single Center Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-Juin Chiang ◽  
Yeong Shiau Pu ◽  
Shiu-Dong Chung ◽  
Shih-Ping Liu ◽  
Hong-Jeng Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Pipemidic Acid ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis with pipemidic acid and levofloxacin in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSP-Bx). From January 2002 to December 2004, patients receiving oral pipemidic acid 500 mg twice daily for three days with or without a preoperative intravenous cefazolin 1 gm injection comprised group A. Between January 2005 and December 2009, patients receiving oral levofloxacin 500 mg one hour before biopsy comprised group B. We calculated the annual febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) rates. Patients’ characteristics, including age, prophylactic antibiotics, biopsy core numbers, pathologic results, PSA, and the spectrums and susceptibility of pathogens, were also evaluated. A total of 1313 (35.5%) patients belonged to group A, while 2381 (64.5%) patients belonged to group B. Seventy-three patients experienced postoperative infectious complications. There was a significant difference in the fUTI rate between groups A and B (3.7% versus 1.0%,P<0.001). The yearly fUTI rates varied from 0.6 to 3.9% between 2002 and 2009. Of the 73 patients with fUTI, those receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis were more likely to harbor fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens (P<0.001).E. coliwas the most common pathogen in both groups. Levofloxacin remains effective and appears superior to pipemidic acid based prophylaxis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document