scholarly journals Trigger Tool Based Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: A Prospective Observational Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-90
Author(s):  
Raja Sree Gadde ◽  
Divya Teja Dhanenkula ◽  
Sowjanya Kammila ◽  
Dharani Nelluri ◽  
Manjusha Polisetty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Trigger Tool ◽  
Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital ◽  
Care Teaching

scholarly journals STUDY TO EVALUATE SEVERE ADRS IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

2017 ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
A. R. Malahat ◽  
C. Deepa Latha ◽  
Sudhakar K. ◽  
Deepika Baloju ◽  
G. Vijayalakshmi
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital ◽  
Care Teaching

Objective: This study attempts to analyze the severe ADRs in a tertiary care centre and assess their seriousness, outcome, causality and severity. We emphasize on the need for reporting of ADRs by all healthcare professionals as it will reduce the burden of morbidity due to drugs and ensure better and more efficient healthcare. To analyse and evaluate the severe ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONs reported from various departments in a Tertiary care Teaching hospital.Methods: It is a prospective observational study that was carried out over a period of 6 mo (from July 2016 to December 2016) to assess the percentage of severe adverse drug reactions reported to the Pharmacovigilance cell of a tertiary care teaching hospital. The data collected included patient’s demographic details, presenting complaints, clinical diagnosis and details of the drug(s) prescribed. The data was analysed for causality (as per the WHO-UMC scale) and severity (as per Hartwig and Siegel scale).Results: Out of 64 ADRs reported, 17 were serious. The majority of serious ADRs were categorized as probable (82.35%), whilst 1(5.8%) was categorized as possible and 2(11.76%) as certain in nature. The criteria for the majority of serious ADRs were hospitalization (%) followed by intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage (%).Conclusion: The highest percentage of severe cases was reported with Antitubercular therapy (23.5%) followed by analgesics (23%) and anti epileptic agents (17.6%).

scholarly journals PATTERN OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeetha Raja ◽  
Jamuna Rani R ◽  
Kala P
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital ◽  
Care Teaching

ABSTRACTObjective: The aim of this study was to carry out adverse drug reactions (ADRs) monitoring in various departments of a tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on ADRs reported in the hospital from December 2012 to May 2013 after obtaining InstitutionalEthics Committee approval.Results: A total of 40 ADRs were reported, 47.50% were males and 52.50% were females. The female adult population was 45%. The majority of ADRswere due to antimicrobial agents especially beta-lactam antibiotics (42.5%) followed by NSAIDs (7.50%). A maximum number of patients (75%)were reported with dermatological manifestations. The department of medicine reported the highest number of ADRs (37.5%). As per Naranjo’sprobability scale, 62.5% reports were assessed as probable. 62.5% reports were documented as mild according to Modified Hartwig’s criteria forseverity assessment.Conclusion: This study was done to sensitize the practicing physicians on the importance of adverse drug monitoring and reporting.Keywords: Pharmacovigilance, Adverse drug reactions, Tertiary care teaching hospital, Antimicrobial agents.

scholarly journals A PRESCRIPTION PATTERN STUDY OF RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS IN PAEDIATRIC INDOOR PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL - A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Badar ◽  
Vidisha Parulekar ◽  
Priti Garate
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital ◽  
Care Teaching ◽  
Tract Infections

Objectives: The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) To study the prescription patterns in Respiratory tract infections (RTI) in indoor patients in pediatric wards. (2) To check the rationality of treatment according to Modified Kunin’s rationality criteria. (3)To analyze the data of RTI by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification.Methods: It was a non-interventional, prospective, observational study which was conducted in indoor pediatric patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Data were analyzed and evaluated according to the WHO rational use of drugs guidelines.Study sample: The study sample was 174.Study duration: The study duration was August 15, 2016–September 15, 2016.Results: Males (63.79%) were more as compared to females (36.20%), and the highest number of cases was seen in infants (62.06%). Acute bronchiolitis (54.02%) was highest in the incidence followed by Wheeze Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (WALRI) (30.45%). The average duration of patient stay in hospital was 4.71 days whereas 93.33% were polytherapy and mostly prescribed antibiotic was amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in acute bronchiolitis and WALRI. Salbutamol (40.84%) and Ipratropium Bromide (39.43%) were the commonly prescribed respiratory medicines. Oral route (42.27%) was the most common route of administration. 56.11% drugs were prescribed by generic name.Conclusion: Standard treatment guidelines for the treatment of RTI need to be urgently developed and strictly implemented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document