scholarly journals Evaluation a Career Planning Course with Case-based Teaching Modelon College Students’ Career Decisions and Learning Satisfaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Huiling Peng ◽  
Wen-Chun Lin

This study aims to investigate the impact of the case-based teaching model on college students' career decision making and learning satisfaction. The study conducted both a pre-test and a post-test on a single group of subjects. Thirty-two freshmen (8 males and 24 females) taking the class “Career Planning in Finance” in the department of finance of a business university. The researcher developed case-based teaching model materials for an 18-week career planning courses in one semester. There are two-hour classes per week for a whole semester. The results are as follows: (1) There are significant differences in the pre-test and the post-test on career decisions measured with career decided scores (t=-4.05, p=0.0028). The differences in career indecision scores are also statistically significant (t=-3.85, p=0.0001); (2) The questionnaire on learning satisfaction reports high scores in general (M=4.73, SD=0.40). Meanwhile, the university’s teaching assessment also indicates high satisfaction in this elective (M=4.89, SD=0.48). Results suggest that college students’ career decision making and learning satisfaction can be increased through their participation in the cased-based career planning courses.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Gray ◽  
Minsung Kim ◽  
Seungyeon Lee

We created a new, 8-item scale called “Career Student Planning Scale (CSPS)” as a need for a valid and reliable measure for college students’ career planning during a pandemic. CSPS is conceptually similar to career decision making difficulty questionnaire (CDDQ) and career decision self-efficacy (CDSE) scale. CSPS leans toward questions regarding college students’ perceptions about career planning rather than intuitions about career decision making and asks about how participants think about their career plan tends to be correct rather than the more extreme idea about how their intuitions are right. We developed this scale to capture the latter construct. We included Coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS), CDDQ, general procrastination scale (GPS), and CDSE short form (CDSE-SF) as a covariate to ensure that CSPS had distinct effects on evaluations of their career path. Our finding indicated that the CSPS has acceptable psychometric properties and shows a significant correlation with those measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document