Exploring Socially Shared Regulation Processes in Peer Tutoring: Focusing on the Functions of Tutor Utterances

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Takamichi Ito ◽  
Takatoyo Umemoto
Keyword(s):  
Peer Tutoring ◽  
Deep Level ◽  
Cognitive Engagement ◽  
Teacher Candidate ◽  
University Education ◽  
Social Regulation ◽  
Verbal Protocols ◽  
Surface Level ◽  
Regulation Functions ◽  
Socially Shared Regulation

This study quantitatively and qualitatively examined socially shared regulation processes in peer tutoring. Participants were 22 teacher-candidate university students assigned to 11 peer-tutoring pairs. Peer tutoring included two sessions, in which one student was the tutor and another the tutee. Participants completed a socially shared regulation of learning (SSRL) scale before peer tutoring and an academic engagement measurement afterward. Moreover, peer tutoring sessions were videotaped. Students were divided into two groups, based on high and low SSRL scores, and verbal protocols were analyzed. Tutoring utterances were analyzed and categorized by the following social regulation functions, namely “orientation,” “monitoring,” and “evaluation,” while distinguishing between deep- or surface-level. Tutors in high-SSRL groups adopted deep-level orientation more than low-SSRL groups. Qualitative analysis indicated deep-level orientation played a key role in peer tutoring. Additionally, regarding motivational factors, high-SSRL groups showed stronger agentic and cognitive engagement than low-SSRL groups. The implications for teacher-candidate university education are discussed.

Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Panadero ◽  
Sanna Järvelä
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Learning Theory ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Social Regulation ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Optimal Form ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
The Past ◽  
Recorded Observation ◽  
Socially Shared Regulation

Abstract. Socially shared regulation of learning (SSRL) has been recognized as a new and growing field in the framework of self-regulated learning theory in the past decade. In the present review, we examine the empirical evidence to support such a phenomenon. A total of 17 articles addressing SSRL were identified, 13 of which presented empirical evidence. Through a narrative review it could be concluded that there is enough data to maintain the existence of SSRL in comparison to other social regulation (e.g., co-regulation). It was found that most of the SSRL research has focused on characterizing phenomena through the use of mixed methods through qualitative data, mostly video-recorded observation data. Also, SSRL seems to contribute to students’ performance. Finally, the article discusses the need for the field to move forward, exploring the best conditions to promote SSRL, clarifying whether SSRL is always the optimal form of collaboration, and identifying more aspects of groups’ characteristics.

Which Matters More?

2016 ◽  
pp. 213-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai P. Trinh
Keyword(s):  
Human Resource ◽  
Deep Level ◽  
Diversity Management ◽  
Openness To Experience ◽  
Personality Characteristics ◽  
Mutual Support ◽  
Team Processes ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Surface Level ◽  
Research Designs

This chapter reviews what we know about the effects of surface-level diversity (age, sex, and ethnicity) and deep-level diversity (personality characteristics such as conscientiousness, openness to experience, extraversion, emotional stability, and agreeableness) in organizational teams. It also outlines challenges to today's diversity management and Human Resource (HR) practices, such as the lack of definite conclusions from research results, the mismatch between team diversity research designs and organizations' needs, and the lack of research examining simultaneously different aspects of diversity. Drawing from analysis results of team data from 55 teams of volunteers from Shanghai, the author recommends that HR training and selection take specific team contexts into account and increase attention on functions that support important team processes such as communication and mutual support among team members.

scholarly journals Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help?

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine W. Phillips ◽  
Gregory B. Northcraft ◽  
Margaret A. Neale
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Deep Level ◽  
Surface Level

Nationality diversity and leader–Member exchange at multiple levels of analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun Pichler ◽  
Beth Livingston ◽  
Andrew Yu ◽  
Arup Varma ◽  
Pawan Budhwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multilevel Model ◽  
Deep Level ◽  
Levels Of Analysis ◽  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Surface Level ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
Multiple Levels ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Nationality Diversity

PurposeThe diversity literature has yet to investigate relationships between diversity and leader–member exchanges (LMX) at multiple levels of analysis. The purpose of this paper is to test a multilevel model of nationality diversity and LMX. In doing so, the authors investigate the role of surface- and deep-level diversity as related to leader–member exchange differentiation (LMXD) and relative LMX (RLMX), and hence to subordinate job performance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors test a multilevel model of diversity and LMX using multisource survey data from subordinates nesting within supervisors. The authors do so in a context where diversity in nationality is pervasive and plays a key role in LMXs, i.e., a multinational organization in Dubai. The authors tested the cross-level moderated model using MPlus.FindingsThe results suggest surface-level similarity is more important to RLMX than deep-level similarity. The relationship between surface-level similarity and RLMX is moderated by workgroup nationality diversity. When workgroups are more diverse, there is a positive relationship between dyadic nationality similarity and RLMX; when workgroups are less diverse, similarity in nationality matters less. Moreover, LMXD at the workgroup level moderates the relationship between RLMX and performance at the individual level.Originality/valueThis study is one of very few to examine both diversity and LMX at multiple levels of analysis. This is the first study to test the workgroup diversity as a cross-level moderator of the relationship between deep-level similarity and LMX. The results challenge the prevailing notion that that deep-level similarity is more strongly related to LMX than surface-level diversity.

A Multidimensional Investigation of Deep-level and Surface-level Processing

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Dinsmore ◽  
Patricia A. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Deep Level ◽  
Surface Level

Diverse Forms of Difference

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Lambert ◽  
Myrtle P. Bell
Keyword(s):  
Deep Level ◽  
The State ◽  
Theory Testing ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Surface Level ◽  
Management Literature

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a review of the state of diversity in management literature, including the most recent conceptualizations and measures developed for studying diversity among individuals within organizations. Background on the theoretical and empirical development of surface-level and deep-level diversity is provided. Turning then to separation, variety, and disparity, the chapter will discuss the meaning, form, and assumptions underlying each type of diversity, and offers guidelines for conceptualization, measurement, and theory testing of each. The authors summarize the findings and suggest ideas for future research to move the diversity field forward.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document