Interactions of analgesics in an oncologically treated patient - why they may be important for the effectiveness and safety of treatment

Ból ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Jarosław Woroń

Drug interactions in patients treated for pain which accompanies cancer can significantly alter the efficacy and safety of treatment. Practice has shown that the knowledge about the interactions of analgesics with drugs used to treat the cancer is small resulting in the risk of complications. In this review, the most important interactions that occur between analgesics and drugs used in cancer treatment were collected.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Cui ◽  
Siqi Tu ◽  
Valerie Sia Jie En ◽  
Xiaobei Li ◽  
Xueting Yao ◽  
...  

Background: As the number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infected people is greatly increasing worldwide, the international medical situation becomes very serious. Potential therapeutic drugs, vaccine and stem cell replacement methods are emerging, so it is urgent to find specific therapeutic drugs and the best treatment regimens. After the publications on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with anti- SARS-COV-2 activity in vitro, a small, non-randomized, open-label clinical trial showed that HCQ treatment was significantly associated with reduced viral load in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Meanwhile, a large prophylaxis study of HCQ sulfate for COVID-19 has been initiated in the United States. HCQ offered a promising efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19, but the optimal administration is still being explored. Methods: We used the keyword "hydroxychloroquine" to conduct a literature search in PubMed to collect relevant literature on the mechanism of action of HCQ, its clinical efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, precautions for clinical use and drug interactions to extract and organize information. Results: This paper reviews the mechanism, clinical efficacy and safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, exposureresponse relationship and precautions and drug interactions of HCQ, and summarizes dosage recommendations for HCQ sulfate. Conclusion: It has been proved that HCQ, which has an established safety profile, is effective against SARS-CoV-2 with sufficient pre-clinical rationale and evidence. Data from high-quality clinical trials are urgently needed worldwide.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-158
Author(s):  
O.A. Limanova ◽  
◽  
L.E. Fedotova ◽  
O.A. Gromova ◽  
◽  
...  

This article discusses the problem of drug interactions between combined oral contraceptives on the example of Belara® (30 μg of ethinyl estradiol + 2 mg of chlormadinone acetate; Gedeon Richter, Hungary) and medications recommended for the treatment of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) and concomitant disorders at the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic levels with an assessment of the efficacy and safety of therapy for females. We described safe, potentially dangerous, and dangerous combinations of these drugs. Key words: new coronavirus infection (CAVID-19), combined oral contraceptives, antiviral drugs, antibacterial drugs, antiinflammatory drugs, anticoagulants, migraine drugs, antihypertensive drugs, oral hypoglycemic drugs, essential micronutrients, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13540-e13540
Author(s):  
Elena Tenti ◽  
Andrea Casadei Gardini ◽  
Sebastiano Cumero ◽  
Martina Minguzzi ◽  
Flavia Foca ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra Yadav ◽  
Pradeep Kumar ◽  
Vandana Rai

AbstractWorldwide breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death in women. Paclitaxel is an effective drug used for the treatment of breast cancer but it has many side effects. Nab-paclitaxel (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) is an FDA approved drug for the treatment of breast cancer. Currently many clinical trials are conducted to deliver nab-paclitaxel into the tumor cells. But the efficacy and safety of this nab-paclitaxel over conventional paclitaxel still remains questionable. So, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in breast cancer treatment.Electronic databases were searched for the suitable studies using key terms “nab-paclitaxel”, “paclitaxel”, and “clinical trial” with the combination of “breast cancer” up to August 11, 2019. Risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed by the Open Meta-Analyst program. A total of eight studies which fulfilled our criteria were included in this study. For efficacy we retrieved data of 12 months progression free survival, 24 months progression free survival, and overall survival (up to 3 years) and for the safety we took data of nausea, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea and pain.We did not found any difference in efficacy of nab-paclitaxel over paclitaxel (12 months progression free survival-RRFE= 0.86, 95%CI= 0.77-0.97, p= 0.02, I2= 25.07%; 24 months progression free survival-RRFE= 0.86, 95% CI= 0.64-1.16, p= 0.34, I2= 0%; and 3 years survival-RRFE= 1.20, 95%CI= 0.92-1.56, p= 0.16, I2= 37.55%). The meta-analysis of studies used nab-paclitaxel showed reduced adverse effect of anemia (ORFE= 1.66, 95% CI= 1.26-2.19; p= <0.001; I2= 0%) and leukopenia (ORFE= 1.37; 95%CI= 1.06-1.75; p= 0.01; I2= 48.63%). However, in case of other adverse effects no significant association was found with nab-paclitaxel (nausea-ORFE=1.15, 95%CI= 0.94-1.41, p= 0.15, I2= 50.12%; neutropenia-ORRE= 0.75, 95%CI= 0.30-1.87, p= 0.54, I2= 94.45%; fatigue-ORRE= 1.11, 95%CI= 0.77-1.62, p= 0.55, I2= 56.02; diarrhea-ORFE= 1.11, 95%CI= 0.77-1.62, p= 0.55; I2= 34.26; pain-ORRE= 1.15, 95%CI= 0.78-1.69, p= 0.45, I2= 52.96%).In conclusion the use of nab-paclitaxel has reduces the side effects of anemia and leukopenia in breast cancer treatment in comparison to paclitaxel but nab-paclitaxel has no effect on the overall survival of the patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. e71-e82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Hebenstreit ◽  
Renate Pichler ◽  
Isabel Heidegger

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 3175-3181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devina K. S. McCray ◽  
Ashley B. Simpson ◽  
Rebecca Flyckt ◽  
Yitian Liu ◽  
Colin O’Rourke ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
V. V Tarasov ◽  
Vladimir N. Chubarev ◽  
E. S Zykova ◽  
A. S Belosludtsev ◽  
E. G Mokshanova ◽  
...  

This review is devoted to updating the existing knowledge about pharmacology of the drugs from the group of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Special attention is paid to comparison of the anticoagulant properties of DOACs with traditional (indirect) anticoagulants at various dosage regimens and to study drug interactions of DOACs with drugs from different pharmacological groups. Widely analyzed the side effects associated with errors in the application of DOACs and provided recommendations for their correction, including the using of reversal agents therapy. Based on this, the presented article will be useful to clinicians to familiarize themselves with modern medical strategies based on the use of drugs from the DOACs group for the prevention and treatment of diseases associated with increased blood clotting ability and using of DOACs specific antagonists for treatment overdose of DOACs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document