Preferowane podejścia do rozwiązywania konfliktów wśród polskich i amerykańskich studentów prawa, w kontekście systemu kształcenia

The purpose of this article is to initially identify conflict resolution strategies among law students of the University of Warsaw, as well as to compare their approach to conflict resolution to similar research done among US law students. In this study Thomas-Kilmann Test was used as a tool for analyzing the preferred conflict resolution approaches. The test was developed in the US but also used in other parts of the world. The results of test among the Polish students obtained during the study were compared with available data of US students. The study was conducted to verify the approach to conflict resolution for those who start legal profession carrier. The researchers were also interested in the question whether the attitude to the conflict changed during the legal education.

Download Full-text

Conflict resolution strategies in expert scheduling systems: a survey and case study

The Knowledge Engineering Review ◽

10.1017/s0269888900005932 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 335-347 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jay Liebowitz ◽

Patricia Lightfoot ◽

Carolyn Dent

Keyword(s):

Conflict Resolution ◽

Expert Systems ◽

Systems Approach ◽

The Us ◽

Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽

Important Activity ◽

Resolution Strategies

AbstractIn the coming years, scheduling will be an increasingly important activity in the manufacturing and aerospace industries, especially at the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Expert systems have successfully been used to aid in the scheduling function. This paper surveys some of the conflict resolution approaches used in building expert scheduling systems, and then examines the feasibility of using an expert systems approach for scheduling activities and resolving conflicts for experimenters to use NASA Goddard-supported satellites. Recommendations for further reading in expert scheduling systems are given.

Download Full-text

The Nature of Children's Conflict Resolution Styles

Children Australia ◽

10.1017/s1035077200002534 ◽

1990 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 10-11 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Phillip T. Slee

Keyword(s):

Conflict Resolution ◽

Human Relations ◽

Physical Force ◽

Second Person ◽

Human Relationships ◽

Conflict Resolution Styles ◽

Conflict Resolution Strategies ◽

Scant Attention ◽

The University ◽

Resolution Strategies

Conflict is an integral part of human relationships. As defined by The University English Dictionary conflict denotes a struggle, a clashing of views or statements, a meeting in opposition or antagonism. The position taken in the present study is that a conflict consists of an opposition between two individuals “when one person does something to which a second person objects” (Hay, 1984, p.2). This particular outlook is consistent with that adopted by Kagan, Knight & Martinez-Romero (1982) in their study of children's conflict resolution styles.Paradoxically, while conflict may be an important aspect of human relations, conflict as evidenced in children's relations has received scant attention. Research has identified possible sex differences in children's conflict with boys engaging in more direct conflict than girls (Miller, Danaher & Forbes, 1986; Shantz, 1986). Boys do appear to use different conflict resolution strategies (namely more threats and physical force as opposed to negotiation) than girls (Miller et al, 1981). Some evidence also exists that there are developmental changes in children's conflict resolution strategies such that from 5 to 9 years there is an increasing use of a reconciliation conflict resolution style (Aboud, 1981).

Download Full-text