THE POSITION OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS – LEGAL ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (XXI) ◽  
pp. 97-114
Author(s):  
Michał Sędziński
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The aim of this article is to comprehensively analyse the legal position of the public prosecutor in administrative proceedings and administrative court proceedings. This subject is interesting because the public prosecutor is usually associated with criminal proceedings and his capacity as the public accuser. However, the public prosecutor plays a special role in administrative proceedings, i.e. participates in them as an entity with the rights of a party, even though he has no legal interest in it. It is also worth noting that the powers of the public prosecutor are clearly more extensive than those of other entities with the rights of a party. This article is an attempt to determine the role of the public prosecutor in administrative proceedings and decide whether he is the accuser or rather the representative of the public interest. The position of the public prosecutor in proceedings before administrative courts is special as well. This issue needs to be discussed in detail, which was taken into account in the second part of the article. The position of the public prosecutor as the advocate of the rule of law is regulated by the Act on the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The analysis of these provisions in conjunction with Chapter 4 of the Code of Administrative Procedure leads to a conclusion that the public prosecutor who acts in administrative proceedings as an entity with the rights of a party has powers vested in him alone and watches over such proceedings, thereby fulfilling the duties of an advocate of the rule of law. To fully show the special position of the public prosecutor, it is necessary to enumerate his powers in administrative proceedings and compare them with the competences of “ordinary” entities with the rights of a party.

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN YANG TIMBUL DARI HUBUNGAN SEWA MENYEWA MOBIL DIKAITKAN DENGAN PASAL 372 KUHP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Hurip Agustina ◽  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
Aal Lukmanul Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Car Rental

Crime embezzlement car rentals are lately often devastating car rental owner. This is an issue where the meaning of a rule of law if the crime committed community can not be followed by the rule of law, such as crimes by way of evasion is one of the types of crimes against human wealth which is stated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which is a crime that does not exist inexhaustible, both from the bottom layer to the top layer of society can also be committing a criminal act embezzlement is a crime that originated from the existence of a trust in others, and that trust is lost because of the lack of an honesty. It is stated that the crime of embezzlement have a problem that is closely linked to attitudes, moral, mental, honesty and trust humans as individuals. The purpose of this study are as follows: 1) To determine and analyze the occurrence of the crime of embezzlement car rental. 2) To know and analyze the application of Article 372 of the Criminal Code the crime of embezzlement in the rental car. 3) To know and analyze the efforts of the police in preventing crime of embezzlement car lease. This study uses normative juridical approach that is used to make the description clear, systematic, transparent and precise about the facts / specific nature of the area and population which is then analyzed to obtain the desired facts. Criminal offense embezzlement rental car can be imprisoned if they meet the overall elements of the offenses charged by the public prosecutor and the offender accountable for his actions. If the offender does not meet one of the elements of which the accused, then it can not be convicted. The elements of criminal responsibility are: 1) committing illegal or criminal acts; 2) for the criminal should be able to be responsible; 3) to have a fault; 4) absence of an excuse. The conclusion from this study is the adoption of Article 372 of the Criminal Code in criminal offenses of embezzlement car rental where the incidence of criminal acts committed tenants for the rented goods belonging to the owner of the rental rights because of misuse or abuse of trust in which the crime of embezzlement are set in the provisions of Article 372 of the Criminal Code.

Zasada szybkości w postępowaniach w sprawach przygotowania i realizacji inwestycji infrastrukturalnych

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 174-188
Author(s):  
Przemysław Ostojski ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Infrastructure Investments ◽  
Principle Of Proportionality ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
The Right

The article concerns the principle of speed in the proceedings regarding the implementation of infrastructure investments. The analysis of individual legal institutions is aimed at assessing statutory regulations of investment acts in the scope of the principle of speed. The aim of the analysis is to verify the assertion that the implementation of specific law-related rules in special investment documents connected with giving priority to the speed of administrative proceedings followed the constitutional principle of proportionality. As a result of the conducted analysis, it should be stated that the implementation of the principle of speed of proceedings to investment acts does not fundamentally violate the essence of constitutional rights of individuals – including the right to challenge decisions and the right to protect of rightly acquired rights. The legislator limits the principles of transparency, as well as the principle of active participation of the party in administrative proceedings, but does not eliminate these principles. Regardless of this, the legislator infringes in the analyzed Acts the essence of the party’s right to submit an application for temporary protection in administrative proceedings. The legislator violates in a qualified manner – due to the public interest – the rule of law and two-instance, preventing the appeals authority in the course of the instance of repealing the decision in its entirety, if the defect affects only its part concerning the property.

scholarly journals PROBLEMS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROSECUTORIAL SUPERVISION IN THE FIELD OF LAND USE

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
V.T. Azizova ◽  
◽  
A.A. Abdullatipova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The relevance of the issues discussed in this article is due to the importance of ensuring the preservation of land, the legality of its use and the protection of land in various ways. The Public Prosecutor 's Office has a significant role to play in this process, which has the right to detect violations of the law in this area, to contribute to their prevention, as well as to bring the perpetrators to various types of responsibility. The purpose of the article is to consider the activities of the Public Prosecutor 's Office in this area, to identify difficulties in this activity and to develop proposals to overcome the identified problems. In conclusion, the following conclusions are made: 1) in addition to prosecutors, the rule of law process in the field of land use should involve all bodies whose activities are related to this area to some extent; 2) the relevant activities of the Public Prosecutor 's Office in the field of land use are to verify the legality of legal documents in this sphere, the activities of supervisory bodies with powers in the field of land use, compliance with the legislation by all parties to land legal relations; 3) the most common types of offences identified by prosecutors in this sphere are the absence of documents for land plots, self-capture of land plots, violation of procedure and legality of allocation of land plots

Part IV Independent Constitutional Institutions, 15 The Public Prosecutor and the Rule of Law in Anglophone Africa

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jowell Jeffrey
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law ◽  
Individual Decisions

This chapter examines the role of the public prosecutor in Anglophone Africa, in the light of two constitutional principles: the separation of powers and the rule of law. It considers the extent to which the prosecutor’s role, and his individual decisions, ought to be separated from ‘policy’ or ‘party-political’, or otherwise ‘partisan’ considerations. How ‘objective’ should (or can) he be? The chapter also considers to what extent the prosecutor’s constitutional role and institutional functions require him to be insulated from judicial review. In the context of government lawyers acting as guardians of the rule of law, the chapter looks at the extent of the prosecutor’s discretion to enforce and not to enforce the law. Finally, it asks whether there may be ways to structure his discretion in the interest of the rule of law.

scholarly journals Proactive Role of Public Prosecutors in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Way Forward for Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol VI (II) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ramzan Kasuri ◽  
Ata Ullah Khan Mahmood ◽  
Ghufran Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right ◽  
And Function

The public prosecution service is an inevitable feature of the Criminal Justice System (CJS). A key position is assigned to the public prosecutor in the administration of the CJS, who exercises considerable powers and responsibilities, who acts with independence, impartiality, and integrity. In present era, neither the rule of law can be upheld, nor can the human rights be protected without effective role of prosecution services that has become one of the essential pillars of the CJS, an essential component of the Rule of Law,powerful center having a lot of authorities and center of attraction. The world is moving towards a prosecutorial justice system. With the help of comparative and qualitative research methodology, this article aimed to analyze the role and function of the public prosecutor in the CJS of different legal systems that enable us to revamp our system in the right direction for making it efficient expeditious, and cost-effective.

COMBINING THE COMPETENCES OF MINISTER OF JUSICE AND THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR GENERAL AS A THREAT TO THE RULE OF LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (XXI) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Paulina Augustyn ◽  
Karolina Bała
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Modern State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

The subject of the following article is to discuss the issue of merging the office of the Prosecutor General and the Minister of Justice. This was one of the changes in the grounds of the Law on the Public Prosecutor’s Office of 28 January 2016, which were aimed at strengthening the independence of the public prosecutor’s office and adjusting the solutions to the needs of a modern state. These changes actually led to the weakening of the independence of the prosecution service and prosecutors. The purpose of the article is to show the threat to the rule of law posed by combining the functions of Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General. In opinion of the authors presenting the greater part of this article the statutory regulations concerning legal status before and after the adoption of the new Act of 28 January 2016 is necessary, to demonstrate dangerous changes in the functioning of the prosecutor’s office and dependence on the executive authority

scholarly journals PEMBATALAN HUKUMAN CAMBUK BAGI PELAKU JARIMAH PENCABULAN ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh / CANING SENTENCE REVERSAL FOR JARIMAH CRIMINAL IN DECISION NUMBER 07/JN/ 2016/MS.Aceh

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 425
Author(s):  
Mansari Mansari ◽  
Hasnul Arifin Melayu
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Public ◽  
Court Of Justice

Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh melalui putusannya Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh membatalkan putusan Hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa yang menjatuhkan hukuman cambuk bagi pelaku pelecehan seksual kepada anak. Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah berbeda dengan tuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum yang menuntut ‘uqubat (hukuman) penjara selama 90 bulan kepada pelaku karena melakukan pelanggaran terhadap Pasal 47 Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim membatalkan hukuman cambuk bagi pelaku pelecehan seksual kepada anak dan mengkaji putusan Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh terkait terpenuhi kepentingan terbaik kepada anak atau tidak. Kajian ini termasuk penelitian yuridis normatif yang mengkaji tentang asas-asas, kaidah-kaidah hukum sesuai teori-teori yang terdapat dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan hakim membatalkan hukuman cambuk dalam putusan Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh dikarenakan putusan MS Langsa belum memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku, supaya anak tidak berjumpa dengan pelaku karenanya hakim tinggi menghukum dengan hukuman penjara, mementingkan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak dan membuatkan pelaku menjadi insaf manakala berada di dalam penjara. Putusan hakim telah memperhatikan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, karena membuat pelaku insaf, menjauhkannya dari anak, sesuai dengan konsep mashlahah murshalah dan adanya pengakuan secara aturan hukum berdasarkan Qanun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat dan Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Diharapkan kepada hakim yang mengadili kasus pelecehan seksual, dan pemerkosaan pada anak supaya memperberat hukumannya dan mengutamakan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak (the best interest of the child) dan masa depannya.Judge of the Court of Syar'iyah of Aceh through its verdict Number 07 / JN / 2016 / MS.Aceh annulled the verdict of the Court of Justice of Syar'iyah Langsa which imposed a whip for the perpetrators of child sexual abuse. The decision of the Court of Syar'iyah is different from that of the Public Prosecutor demanding 'uqubat (punishment) of imprisonment for 90 months to the perpetrator for violating Article 47 Qanun Aceh Number 6 Year 2014 on Jinayat Law. This study aims to determine the judge's consideration of cancellation of punishment for child abuse perpetrators and review the decision No. 07 / JN / 2016 / MS.Aceh related to the best interests of the child or not. This study includes normative juridical research that examines the principles, legal rules according to theories contained in the science of law. The result of the research shows that judge consideration cancels the caning punishment in decision No. 07 / JN / 2016 / MS.Aceh because the decision of MS Langsa has not given deterrent effect to the perpetrator, so that children do not meet with the perpetrator because high judge punish by prison sentence, and make the perpetrator become converted when in prison. The judge's decision has taken into account the best interests of the child, for making the perpetrators convert them away from the children, in accordance with the concept of masshlahah murshalah and the recognition of the rule of law based on Qanun Aceh Number 7 of 2013 on the Law of Jinayat and Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014 on Jinayat Law. It is expected that the judge who hears cases of sexual harassment, and rape on the child in order to aggravate the sentence and prioritize the best interest of the child and the future.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN THE FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-39
Author(s):  
Iryna Boiko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Procedure ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Act ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The article emphasizes the need to adopt a legislative act on administrative procedure in Ukraine,which is conditioned by the European integration aspirations of the state, human-centeredorientation of public administration. In the absence of a single law that would contain therules of administrative procedure, fragmentary legal regulation of the procedure for adoptingadministrative acts, case law plays a significant role in shaping the concept of administrativeprocedure. The purpose of the article is to study the case law in order to outline the positions formulated by the court to understand the content of the administrative procedure, the rulesthat make it up. The study used the following scientific methods: empirical, which was able totrack among a large number of court decisions, which formed positions that embody the basicprinciples and principles of the concept of administrative procedure, and theoretical, includinganalysis and generalization, which allowed to draw conclusions about the role of judicial practicein developing the basic foundations of administrative procedure. Legal procedure, interpreted bythe court as part of the rule of law and the rule of law, is an important guarantee against abuse bypublic authorities in decision-making and actions that must ensure fair treatment of the individual.As a result of the research it was found out that the courts have developed and outlined in theirdecisions a number of positions on understanding certain aspects of administrative procedure: theessence of legal procedure, its significance in administrative and legal regulation; the essence ofthe principle of legitimate expectations; regarding the assessment of the ratio of the violation ofthe administrative procedure with the legality of the adopted act; understanding of a person’s rightto be heard (or the right to participate in administrative proceedings); ensuring the legitimateinterest (trust) of the person in maintaining the administrative act; on the admissibility of evidencein administrative proceedings; impossibility of termination (cancellation) of an administrative act,the effect of which is exhausted by execution, as well as regarding the principles of implementationof discretion by the public administration. The article concludes that the case law forms the basicideas and conclusions that can be embedded in the doctrine of administrative procedure. Thus, infact, the courts fill the gaps in the legal regulation of the procedure for adopting administrative acts.

scholarly journals Forensic content of participation of the public prosecutor in preliminary hearing and judicial investigation

2021 ◽  
pp. 28-37
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Anatol'evna Zayceva
Keyword(s):  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Closing Arguments ◽  
The Public ◽  
Judicial Investigation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Court Hearing

The subject of this research is the activity of the public prosecutor in court hearing. Methodological framework for this article is comprised of the dialectical, logical, formal-legal, and hermeneutical methods. The normative base consists of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, criminal procedure legislation, and local normative acts that regulate participation of the prosecutors in the judicial stages of criminal proceedings. Attention is focused on the theoretical and applied questions of participation of the public prosecutor in preliminary hearing and judicial investigation. The article reviews opinions of the scholars on participation of the prosecutor in court hearing, as well as the specificity of the prosecutor's work at the stage of state prosecution in court. The author substantiates the importance of preparedness of the public prosecutor to state prosecution, including fundamental examination of all materials pertaining to a criminal case for successful prosecution in the court of first instance. The conclusion is made that the effectiveness of state prosecution depends on the quality of preparedness of the prosecutor to court proceedings, which alongside the appropriate order of investigation of evidence, sufficiency and coherence of evidence, allow the public prosecutor to make the closing arguments.

scholarly journals Principle of the rule of law in administrative judiciary

2021 ◽  
pp. 235-239
Author(s):  
I.G. Kozynets ◽  
K.B. Mishasta
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Justice

One of the key principles of administrative justice - the rule of law, is analyzed in this article. In other words, the article is devoted to a generalized study of legislation and scientific sources to identify the meaning of the principle of the rule of law as a universal principle of administrative justice. It`s role in the administrative process is outlined. It was noted that this principle is reflected and consolidated not only in the provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, but also in other regulations. The different opinions of scientists on the understanding of the principle of the rule of law are analyzed. On the basis of various approaches and identification of different aspects of understanding of the principle of the rule of law in the scientific literature, voicing positions on the impossibility of a thorough definition of its essence, the complexity and complexity of its essence. In accordance with the principle of the rule of law, the law and its norms incorporated in the current legislation are the main regulating factor of social relations, including administrative and procedural ones. The work examines the elements of the rule of law, which are defined as mandatory in accordance with the provisions of the European Commission’s Doha «For Democracy through Law». At the same time, the principle of the rule of law is not exhausted only by these requirements and characteristics, as they are constantly evolving and complementing, and the conditions for their observance are also changing.Based on the analysis of the positions of scholars on the content of the rule of law, it was concluded that the principle of the rule of law is a universal and integral principle of administrative proceedings. According to the au-thors, the principle of the rule of law in administrative proceedings provides for the administration of justice with respect for constitutional rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of man and citizen, in order to protect them from wrongful violation and only in accordance with the Constitution and other laws of Ukraine. If the administrative court applies the provisions of legislative or other regulations that unfairly restrict or violate the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of the person, or if they are interpreted in this way, the decision rendered in such a case must be declared invalid.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document