SECTION OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE: INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE

1968 ◽  
Vol 2 (S6) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
Hans Engel

Why I became an occupational physician … briefly explores the reasons and influences behind H. Engel’s decision to pursue a career in occupational medicine. It takes us through his move from Nazi Germany to a British Medical School, service in the Armed Forces, and later move to industrial medicine.


Author(s):  
Ralph Ashton

Why I became an occupational physician … briefly explores the reasons and influences behind Ralph Aston’s decision to pursue a career in occupational medicine. It takes us through fifty years of his career as he ascends the ranks of ‘industrial medicine’ through changing motivations and the odd bit of advice.


Author(s):  
B.H. Pentney

This series provides a selection of articles from the past. In Fifty years ago: ‘General practice and industrial medicine in the United States’ B.H. Pentney briefly explores the trend towards compensation in occupational medicine, and how it may be a hindrance to the practice.


Author(s):  
Roy Archibald

Why I became an occupational physician … briefly explores the reasons and influences behind Roy Archibald’s decision to pursue a career in occupational medicine. It takes us through how his liking for clinical medicine, prevention, and administration could be combined in the new and largely unrecognized specialty of industrial medicine in the 1940s.


Author(s):  
Robert R. Orford ◽  
Hamid Rehman

Occupational medicine is the medical specialty devoted to 1) prevention and management of occupational injury, illness, and disability, and 2) promotion of health and productivity of workers, their families, and communities. Historically, occupational medicine was termed industrial medicine when heavy industry (eg, lumbering, automobile manufacturing, mining, railroads, steel manufacturing) employed physicians to provide acute medical and surgical care for workers. However, by 1945, medical programs had spread to business organizations that predominantly were staffed with clerical and service employees (eg, banks, insurance companies, mercantile establishments). The broader designation of occupational medicine then came into common use. Occupational medicine was recognized as a specialty by the American Board of Preventive Medicine in 1955.


Author(s):  
Leonid A. Strizhakov ◽  
Sergey A. Babanov ◽  
Denis V. Vinnikov ◽  
Igor I. Berezin ◽  
Anna S. Agarkova ◽  
...  

We devoted this article to the problem of causation and evaluation of causality associations in the occupational epidemiology, exposure assessment, occupational health, and industrial medicine using methodological approaches of clinical epidemiology, for which the term "evidence-based medicine" is wider used in the Russian Federation. The researchers paid some attention to the historical aspects of causality assessment in occupational medicine in the Russian Federation. The authors discuss the issues of evidence in occupational medicine, planning, and implementation of epidemiological studies in occupational therapy using specialized questionnaires and clinical, functional, molecular, and genetic techniques. We analyzed the concept of the "risk factor" of the disease along with the organizational and methodological bases of assessment and management of occupational risks in industrial medicine. The paper also offers applied examples of the relative risk assessment, highlighting the advantages and perils of selected methods in a comparative analysis. Scientists have affected the contribution of systematic reviews aiming to mine evidence-based rationale in occupational epidemiology. The authors speculate and conclude on the importance of risk assessment in the overall morbidity reduction in occupational medicine through efficient prevention programs, along with the underpinnings to include work-related conditions in the national loss of occupational diseases.


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Richard T. Katz ◽  
Sankar Perraraju

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fourth Edition, offers several categories to describe impairment in the shoulder, including shoulder amputation, abnormal shoulder motion, peripheral nerve disorders, subluxation/dislocation, and joint arthroplasty. This article clarifies appropriate methods for rating shoulder impairment in a specific patient, particularly with reference to the AMA Guides, Section 3.1j, Shoulder, Section 3.1k, Impairment of the Upper Extremity Due to Peripheral Nerve Disorders, and Section 3.1m, Impairment Due to Other Disorders of the Upper Extremity. A table shows shoulder motions and associated degrees of motion and can be used in assessing abnormal range of motion. Assessments of shoulder impairment due to peripheral nerve lesion also requires assessment of sensory loss (or presence of nerve pain) or motor deficits, and these may be categorized to the level of the spinal nerves (C5 to T1). Table 23 is useful regarding impairment from persistent joint subluxation or dislocation, and Table 27 can be helpful in assessing impairment of the upper extremity after arthroplasty of specific bones of joints. Although inter-rater reliability has been reasonably good, the validity of the upper extremity impairment rating has been questioned, and further research in industrial medicine and physical disability is required.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bracker ◽  
J. Blumberg ◽  
M. Hodgson ◽  
E. Storey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document