scholarly journals In situ ruminal digestion kinetics of forages and feed byproducts in cattle and buffalo

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sarwar ◽  
Mahr-un-Nisa ◽  
S. A. Bhatti ◽  
C. S. Ali
1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Z. Yang ◽  
K. A. Beauchemin ◽  
L. M. Rode

In situ ruminal digestion kinetics of temper-rolled hulless barley were affected by the moisture content of grain prior to processing. A moisture content of 21% resulted in optimum ruminal digestion of temper-rolled hulless barley. Key words: Hulless barley, grain processing, temper-rolling, in situ digestion, ruminal degradability


2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.N. Di Marco ◽  
M.S. Aello ◽  
S. Arias

The in situ dry matter (DM) disappearance of corn silages in two maturity stages (milk grain and half milk line) of known in vivo and in vitro digestibility was determined, with the main purpose of comparing digestibility values with the ruminal disappearance at 24 and 48h of incubation. A secondary goal was the description of their ruminal digestion kinetics, from which the effective degradability was calculated at an assumed passage rate of 4%/h. Data of in vivo, in vitro and in situ degradability at 24 and 48-h were analyzed with a linear model that included as fixed effects the maturity and the methodology of evaluation, and the kinetic data were described by the exponential model of McDonald. There was a significant effect (P<0.05) of methodology in the estimation of digestibility, but not of maturity or interaction maturity × methodology. The in vivo digestibility (52.9%) was not different from the 24-h in situ degradability (55.6%) with numerical values in the range of the effective degradability. The in vitro digestibility (61.6%) was not different from the 48-h in situ degradability (61.9%), being both estimates higher than the in vivo digestibility. The 24-h in situ degradability was a closer estimator of the in vivo digestibility and the 48-h in situ degradability and the in vitro digestibility overestimated the in vivo parameter by 15-20%.


1997 ◽  
Vol 68 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Silva ◽  
R.C. Wanderley ◽  
A.F. Pedroso ◽  
G. Ashbell

1998 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 209-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Mertens ◽  
P. J. Weimer

Methodology can play a critical rôle in the measurement of digestion kinetics, especially when the objective is to define kinetic parameters for use in formulating rations or modelling animal responses. Measurement of gas production kinetics provides the opportunity to evaluate the rate of digestion of the soluble, more rapidly fermenting fractions of foods but has the potential for being more sensitive to the in vitro procedure used. Differences among procedures that have little impact on digestion of dry matter after 48 h of incubation, may have dramatic effects on fermentation of soluble matter during the first 20 h. Our objective was to develop a method for measuring the kinetics of gas production that would minimize any detrimental effects associated with the in vitro system and provide estimates of digestion kinetics that can be used to both describe foods for ration formulation systems and provide parameters for models of ruminal digestion.


1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 3524-3534 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.G. Atwell ◽  
N.R. Merchen ◽  
E.H. Jaster ◽  
G.C. Fahey ◽  
L.L. Berger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document