Comparative Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of an Alternate Next-Day Enrichment Protocol for VIP® Gold for Salmonella Method to Culture Methods for the Detection of Salmonella in Selected Foods and Environmental Surfaces

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 815-827
Author(s):  
David E Kerr ◽  
George Shen ◽  
Andrew H Lienau ◽  
Mandeep Kaur ◽  
Amy L Immermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Chicken Carcass ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Enrichment Protocol ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Background: VIP® Gold for Salmonella is a lateral flow immunodetection device that was validated by AOAC in 1999 as Official Method of Analysis 999.09. It was improved upon in 2009 by introducing gold colloid as the detection method. Objective: A simple next-day enrichment protocol using modified enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli media was developed for the VIP Gold for Salmonella to improve the time-to-results and laboratory work flow. Methods: We tested 128 Salmonella strains, representing all serotypes from A to Z and 51 to 66 as well as 50 non-Salmonella strains for inclusivity/exclusivity. Performance of the VIP using the new enrichment protocol was compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for the detection of Salmonella in ready-to-eat poultry, roast beef, and chicken carcass rinsate. VIP performance was also compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) for the detection of Salmonella from raw spinach, raw almonds, raw pasta, and environmental surfaces (stainless steel, rubber, and plastic). Results: The VIP detected all 128 of Salmonella strains and none of the 50 non-Salmonella strains. There was no statistically significant difference in the numbers of positive results with VIP Gold for Salmonella protocol compared with appropriate USDA-Food Safety and Inspection Service or FDA-BAM reference methods for any of these matrixes. Conclusions: This new enrichment protocol has met all the requirements to be approved as a Performance Tested MethodSM. Highlights: The new enrichment protocol will improve the time-to-results and allow quicker decisions about the contamination of food products.

Comparative Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of an Alternate Next-Day Enrichment Protocol for the TRANSIA® PLATE Salmonella Gold Method to Culture Methods for the Detection of Salmonella in Selected Foods and Environmental Surfaces

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 828-841
Author(s):  
David E Kerr ◽  
George Shen ◽  
Andrew H Lienau ◽  
Ta Deng ◽  
Mandeep Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Chicken Carcass ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Enrichment Protocol ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
Comparative Validation

Abstract TRANSIA® PLATE Salmonella Gold is an ELISA that was validated by Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) in 2001 and as a Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) by AOAC in 2006 (PTM No. 010602) as a two-step enrichment protocol requiring 48 h. A simple next-day enrichment protocol using modified Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli media was developed for the TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold to improve the time-to-results and laboratory work flow. We tested 128 Salmonella strains, representing all serotypes from A though Z and 51–66. TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold detected all 128 of these strains. None of the 50 non-Salmonella strains were detected by TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold. Performance of TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold using the new enrichment protocol was compared with U.S. Department of Agriculture Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for the detection of Salmonella in ready-to-eat poultry, ready-to-eat beef, and chicken carcass rinsate. In addition, TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold performance was compared with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) for the detection of Salmonella from raw spinach, raw almonds, raw pasta, and environmental surfaces (stainless steel, rubber, and plastic). There was no statistically significant difference in the numbers of positive results TRANSIA PLATE Salmonella Gold protocol compared with the appropriate U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service or FDA-BAM reference methods for any of these matrixes. Robustness testing demonstrated that the introduction of small changes in the normal assay parameters had no impact on the method performance. This new enrichment protocol has been approved as a Third Level modification to Performance Tested Method 010602.

Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1672-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Yang ◽  
Shannon Kaplan ◽  
Michael Reshatoff ◽  
Ernie Hu ◽  
Alexis Zukowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Reference Methods ◽  
Smoked Salmon ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Detection Assay ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The Roka Listeria Detection Assay was compared to the reference culture methods for nine select foods and three select surfaces. The Roka method used Half-Fraser Broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C for 24–28 h. Comparison of Roka's method to reference methods requires an unpaired approach. Each method had a total of 545 samples inoculated with a Listeria strain. Each food and surface was inoculated with a different strain of Listeria at two different levels per method. For the dairy products (Brie cheese, whole milk, and ice cream), our method was compared to AOAC Official MethodSM993.12. For the ready-to-eat meats (deli chicken, cured ham, chicken salad, and hot dogs) and environmental surfaces (sealed concrete, stainless steel, and plastic), these samples were compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) method MLG 8.07. Cold-smoked salmon and romaine lettuce were compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 10 (FDA/BAM) method. Roka's method had 358 positives out of 545 total inoculated samples compared to 332 positive for the reference methods. Overall the probability of detection analysis of the results showed better or equivalent performance compared to the reference methods.

Validation of the Reveal® 2.0 Group D1 Salmonella Test for Detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in Raw Shell Eggs and Poultry-Associated Matrixes

2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 1017-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mozola ◽  
Preetha Biswas ◽  
Ryan Viator ◽  
Emily Feldpausch ◽  
Debra Foti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salmonella Enteritidis ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Poultry Feed ◽  
Operating Parameters ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Shell Eggs ◽  
Chicken Carcass ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Culture Procedure

Abstract A study was conducted to assess the performance of the Reveal® 2.0 Group D1 Salmonella lateral flow immunoassay for use in detection of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) in raw shell eggs and poultry-associated matrixes, including chicken carcass rinse and poultry feed. In inclusivity testing, the Reveal 2.0 test detected all 37 strains of SE tested. The test also detected all but one of 18 non-Enteritidis somatic group D1 Salmonella serovars examined. In exclusivity testing, none of 42 strains tested was detected. The exclusivity panel included Salmonella strains of somatic groups other than D1, as well as strains of other genera of Gram-negative bacteria. In matrix testing, performance of the Reveal 2.0 test was compared to that of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference culture procedure for chicken carcass rinse and to that of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual for raw shell eggs and poultry feed. For all matrixes evaluated, there were no significant differences in the ability to detect SE when comparing the Reveal 2.0 method and the appropriate reference culture procedure as determined by probability of detection statistical analysis. The ability of the Reveal 2.0 test to withstand modest perturbations to normal operating parameters was examined in robustness experiments. Results showed that the test can withstand deviations in up to three operating parameters simultaneously without significantly affecting performance. Real-time stability testing of multiple lots of Reveal 2.0 devices established the shelf life of the test device at 16 months postmanufacture.

Deoxyribonucleic Acid Hybridization Method for the Detection of Listeria in Dairy Products, Seafoods, and Meats: Collaborative Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Curiale ◽  
Terri Sons ◽  
Luanne Fanning ◽  
Wendy Lepper ◽  
Dawn Mclver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Products ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Culture Method ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid ◽  
Administration Method ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The method is based on the hybridization of synthetic deoxyribonucleic acid probes to ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences unique to Listeria. This method was compared to 2 culture methods: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration method for the detection of Listeria in dairy products and sea-foods and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service method for Listeria in meats. Six food types with replicate samples containing various concentrations of Listeria were analyzed by the collaborating laboratories. Listeria was detected in 774 samples using the DNAH method and in 772 samples using a culture method. The DNAH and culture methods were in agreement for 668 samples containing Listeria and 306 samples without Listeria. The overall rate of agreement between methods was 82.3%. The method has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

scholarly journals Visual Immunoprecipitate Assay Eight Hour Method for Detection of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Raw and Cooked Beef (Modification of AOAC Official Method 996.09): Collaborative Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T Feldsine ◽  
David E Kerr ◽  
Stephanie C Leung ◽  
Andrew H Lienau ◽  
Ruth F Moser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Culture Method ◽  
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia Coli ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157 ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract AOAC Official Method 996.09, Visual Immunoprecipitate Assay (VIP®) for Escherichia coli O157:H7, was modified to incorporate a new enrichment protocol using BioControl EHEC8™ medium for testing raw and cooked beef. Foods were tested by VIP assay and the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS) enrichment procedure and the FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) isolation and confirmation techniques. A total of 15 collaborators participated. Raw and cooked ground beef were inoculated with E. coli O157:H7 at 2 different levels: a high level, where predominantly positive results were expect d, and a low level where fractional recovery was anticipated. Collaborators tested 396 test portions and controls by both methods, for a total of 792 test portions. Of the 396 paired test portions, 75 were positive and 230 were negative by both the VIP and culture methods. Eleven test portions were presumptively positive by VIP and could not be confirmed culturally; 32 were negative by VIP, but confirmed positive by culture; and 65 were negative by the culture method, but confirmed positive by the VIP method. There was no statistical difference between results obtained with the VIP for EHEC 8 h method and the culture method except for cooked beef, where the VIP had significantly higher recovery for one inoculation level.

scholarly journals DuPont Qualicon BAX® System Assay for Genus Listeria 24E

2011 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-871
Author(s):  
F Morgan Wallace ◽  
Dawn Fallon ◽  
Daniel DeMarco ◽  
Stephen Varkey
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Method Comparison ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Service Culture ◽  
Steel Surfaces ◽  
Consistent Performance ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The new BAX® System PCR Assay for Genus Listeria 24E was evaluated for detecting Listeria spp. in frankfurters, spinach, cooked shrimp, queso fresco cheese, and on stainless steel surfaces with a single-stage enrichment in BAX System 24 Listeria Enrichment Broth (24 LEB). Method comparison studies performed on samples with low-level inoculates showed that the BAX System demonstrates a sensitivity equivalent or superior to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service culture methods, but with a significantly shorter time to result. Tests to evaluate inclusivity and exclusivity returned no false-negative and no false-positive results on a diverse panel of isolates, and tests for lot-to-lot variability and tablet stability demonstrated consistent performance. Ruggedness studies determined that none of the factors examined, within the range of deviations from specified parameters examined, affect the performance of the assay.

SAS™ Molecular Tests Salmonella Detection Kit

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 808-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra Bapanpally ◽  
Laura Montier ◽  
Shah Khan ◽  
Akif Kasra ◽  
Sharon L Brunelle
Keyword(s):  
Hold Time ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Amplification Method ◽  
Chicken Carcass ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The SAS™ Molecular tests Salmonella Detection method, a Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification method, performed as well as or better than the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual reference methods for ground beef, beef trim, ground turkey, chicken carcass rinses, bagged mixed lettuce, and fresh spinach. The ground beef (30% fat, 25 g test portion), poultry matrixes and leafy greens were validated in a 6–7 h enrichment, and ground beef (30% fat, 375 g composite test portion) and beef trim (375 g composite test portion) were validated in a 16–20 h enrichment. The method performance for meat and leafy green matrixes was shown to be acceptable under conditions of co-enrichment with Escherichia coli O157. Thus, after a short 6–7 h co-enrichment step, ground beef, beef trim, lettuce, and spinach can be tested for both Salmonella and E. coli O157. Inclusivity and exclusivity testing revealed no false negatives and no false positives among the 100 Salmonella serovars and 30 non- Salmonella species examined. The method was shown to be robust when enrichment time, DNA extract hold time, and DNA volume were varied.

Reveal®Listeria 2.0 Test for Detection of Listeria spp. in Foods and Environmental Samples

2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Alles ◽  
Stephanie Curry ◽  
David Almy ◽  
Balamurugan Jagadeesan ◽  
Jennifer Rice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Test Sample ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Sample Volume ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Culture Procedure

Abstract A Performance Tested MethodSM validation study was conducted for a new lateral flow immunoassay (Reveal®Listeria 2.0) for detection of Listeria spp. in foods and environmental samples. Results of inclusivity testing showed that the test detects all species of Listeria, with the exception of L. grayi. In exclusivity testing conducted under nonselective growth conditions, all non-listeriae tested produced negative Reveal assay results, except for three strains of Lactobacillus spp. However, these lactobacilli are inhibited by the selective Listeria Enrichment Single Step broth enrichment medium used with the Reveal method. Six foods were tested in parallel by the Reveal method and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) reference culture procedure. Considering data from both internal and independent laboratory trials, overall sensitivity of the Reveal method relative to that of the FDA/BAM procedure was 101%. Four foods were tested in parallel by the Reveal method and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) reference culture procedure. Overall sensitivity of the Reveal method relative to that of the USDA-FSIS procedure was 98.2%. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of positives obtained by the Reveal and reference culture procedures in any food trials. In testing of swab or sponge samples from four types of environmental surfaces, sensitivity of Reveal relative to that of the USDA-FSIS reference culture procedure was 127%. For two surface types, differences in the number of positives obtained by the Reveal and reference methods were statistically significant, with more positives by the Reveal method in both cases. Specificity of the Reveal assay was 100%, as there were no unconfirmed positive results obtained in any phase of the testing. Results of ruggedness experiments showed that the Reveal assay is tolerant of modest deviations in test sample volume and device incubation time.

scholarly journals Comparative Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of a Minor Modification to AOAC Method 997.03 [Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP®) for Listeria] to the Reference Culture Methods

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T Feldsine ◽  
David E Kerr ◽  
George S Shen ◽  
Andrew H Lienau
Keyword(s):  
Official Method ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Environmental Surface ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Comparative Validation ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP®) for the Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces, AOAC Official Method 997.03, has been modified to use a simplified housing for the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture methods. Two food matrixes and one environmental surface were analyzed. In total, valid results were obtained from 145 samples and controls. Results showed that the modified VIP for Listeria spp. is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Listeria.

Contamination Revealed by Indicator Microorganism Levels during Veal Processing

2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1341-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH M. BOSILEVAC ◽  
RONG WANG ◽  
BRANDON E. LUEDTKE ◽  
TOMMY L. WHEELER ◽  
MOHAMMAD KOOHMARAIE
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Veal Calves ◽  
Indicator Microorganism ◽  
Analysis Of Results ◽  
Aerobic Plate Count ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
The U.S

ABSTRACT During site visits of veal processors, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) has reported processing deficiencies that likely contribute to increased levels of veal contamination. Here, we report the results of measuring aerobic plate count bacteria (APC), Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms (CF), and Escherichia coli during eight sample collections at five veal processors to assess contamination during the harvest of bob veal and formula-fed veal before (n = 5 plants) and after (n = 3 plants) changes to interventions and processing practices. Hides of veal calves at each plant had mean log CFU/100 cm2 APC, Enterobacteriaceae, CF, and E. coli of 6.02 to 8.07, 2.95 to 5.24, 3.28 to 5.83, and 3.08 to 5.59, respectively. Preintervention carcasses had mean log CFU/100 cm2 APC, Enterobacteriaceae, CF, and E. coli of 3.08 to 5.22, 1.16 to 3.47, 0.21 to 3.06, and −0.07 to 3.10, respectively, before and 2.72 to 4.50, 0.99 to 2.76, 0.69 to 2.26, and 0.33 to 2.12, respectively, after changes were made to improve sanitary dressing procedures. Final veal carcasses had mean log CFU/100 cm2 APC, Enterobacteriaceae, CF, and E. coli of 0.36 to 2.84, −0.21 to 1.59, −0.23 to 1.59, and −0.38 to 1.45 before and 0.44 to 2.64, −0.16 to 1.33, −0.42 to 1.20, and −0.48 to 1.09 after changes were made to improve carcass-directed interventions. Whereas the improved dressing procedures resulted in improved carcass cleanliness, the changes to carcass-directed interventions were less successful, and veal processors are urged to use techniques that ensure uniform and consistent delivery of antimicrobials to carcasses. Analysis of results comparing bob veal to formula-fed veal found bob veal hides, preintervention carcasses, and final carcasses to have increased (P < 0.05) APC, Enterobacteriaceae, CF, and E. coli (with the exception of hide Enterobacteriaceae; P > 0.05) relative to formula fed veal. When both veal categories were harvested at the same plant on the same day, similar results were observed. Since identification by FSIS, the control of contamination during veal processing has started to improve, but challenges still persist.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document