scholarly journals The Use of rLH, HMG and hCG in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Author(s):  
Micah J. ◽  
Anthony M.
2012 ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
Ngoc Thanh Cao ◽  
Minh Tam Le ◽  
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen

In routine assisted reproductive technologies (ART), controlled ovarian stimulation is recommended to overcome the selection of one dominant follicle and to allow the growth of a cohort of follicles. This management aims to increase the number of oocytes and therefore the number of embryos leads to increasing the chance of transferring the high quality embryos. However, there is still about 10% of ART cycles face to low response with controlled ovarian stimulation which is one of the major challenges to clinical endocrinologists. Poor responders have a higher incidence of cycle cancellation, lower fertilization, and lower implantation rates. So far, there is no universally accepted definition of poor responders, with many different criteria in static tests and dynamic tests as well as different cutoff levels used to predict the ovarian response. That is the reason why the review studies show limited data of highly agreed diagnosis, management and prediction of the condition. After trying some different stimulation protocols, oocyte donation can be a choice and more research in basic medicine should be carried out to understand the mechanism underlying this condition


Author(s):  
M. S. Khmil ◽  
B. M. Ventskivskyi ◽  
S. V. Khmil

The aim of the study – to improve infertility treatment by optimizing pregravid therapy and selecting the optimal stimulation protocol and ovulation trigger in patients with PCOS. Materials and Methods. 157 infertile patients with PCOS were examined. Depending on the method of treatment, patients were divided into three clinical groups. Group 1 consisted of 63 women who received FT 500-Plus and vitamin D3 Aquadetrim for 2–3 months before stimulation, group 2 – 48 women who received folic acid, group 3 – 46 women who did not receive pregravid preparation. Stimulation was conducted with corifolitropin-alpha Elonva according to a short protocol, GnRH antagonist Orgalutran and follicle-stimulating hormone Puregon, as a trigger GnRH agonist Diphereline was used (in groups 2 and 3 – 0.2 mg/ml once, and in group 1 the protocol was modified by us: 0.2 mg/ml + an additional 0.1 mg/ml after 12 hours). The effectiveness of the proposed infertility treatment regimen was assessed by the following indicators: the frequency of complications, in particular OHSS, the total percentage of efficiency of the obtained oocytes, the degree of maturity of the oocytes obtained and the yield of blastocysts. Results and Discussion. When evaluating the results of superovulation induction, it was found that the duration of stimulation in group 1 was probably lower compared to groups 2 and 3. On the day of the ovulation trigger, a significantly lower concentration of estradiol and progesterone was found in group 1, compared with the data of other groups. In study group 1, where the introduction of the ovulation trigger was modified in own way, significantly fewer immature (GV and MI) oocytes were found, while the average number of mature eggs significantly exceeded the data of groups 2 and 3. The number of blastocysts in women with infertility on the background of PCOS group 1 was also significantly higher than the results obtained in other groups. Conclusions. Controlled ovarian stimulation according to a short protocol using a vitamin complex with inositol and vitamin D3 in pregravid preparation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and GnRH agonist trigger –Diphereline at a dose of 0.2 mg/ml + 0.1 mg/ml after 12 hours is more effective in the program of assisted reproductive technologies in PCOS, as it increases the number of mature cells (by 12.20 %) and blastocysts (by 16.26 %). It is also safer because its use significantly reduces the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (1.6 %) in women with infertility with PCOS compared to other controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) regimens.


GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Andrey Y Romanov ◽  
Anastasiya G Syrkasheva ◽  
Nataliya V Dolgushina ◽  
Elena A Kalinina

The paper analyzes the literature data on the use of the growth hormone (GH) in ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Routine use of GH in ovarian stimulation in patients with a normal GH level does not increase pregnancy and childbirth rates in ART. Also, no benefits of using GH have been identified for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, despite the increase in insulin and IGF-1 blood levels. The main research focus is to study the use of GH in patients with poor ovarian response. According to the meta-analysis conducted by X.-L. Li et al. (2017), GH in ovarian stimulation of poor ovarian responders increases the number of received oocytes, mature oocytes number, reduces the embryo transfer cancellation rate and does not affect the fertilization rate. The pregnancy and live birth rates are significantly higher in the group of GH use - by 1.65 (95% CI 1.23-2.22) and 1.73 (95% CI 1.25-2.40) times, respectively. Thus, it is advisable to use GH in ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders, since it allows to increases live birth rate in ART. However, further studies should determine the optimal GH dose and assesse it`s safety in ART programs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 104805
Author(s):  
Flora França Nogueira Mariotti ◽  
Bianca Santos Martins Gonçalves ◽  
Giovanna Pimpão ◽  
Marcos Mônico-Neto ◽  
Hanna Karen Moreira Antunes ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 864-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randle S. Corfman ◽  
Magdy P. Milad ◽  
Tracy L. Bellavance ◽  
Steven J. Ory ◽  
Lisa D. Erickson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
N.L. Shamugiya ◽  
◽  
M.S. Borisova ◽  
N.M. Podzolkova ◽  
◽  
...  

Objective. To increase the efficiency of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in young patients with reduced ovarian reserve after ovarian surgery. Patients and methods. 141 patients were examined. In the first group (main), 56 patients with reduced ovarian reserve after unilateral/bilateral ovarian resection were included. In the second group (comparison group) – 85 patients with reduced ovarian reserve of unknown etiology were included. Results. There were no differences in the assessment of ovarian reserve in groups (p > 0.05). Stimulation protocols in groups differed in terms of the daily and total dose of gonadotropins (p < 0.05). The main group and the comparison group differed in terms of the quality of the obtained oocytes (3.11 ± 1.69 vs 3.99 ± 2.38; p = 0.0244) and embryos (1.25 ± 1.19 vs 1.73 ± 1.55; p = 0.0465). Perinatal outcomes in groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), but in the main group there was a greater number of spontaneous miscarriages and premature births (3.1% versus 1.9%), which may indicate the influence of etiological factor in reducing the ovarian reserve on carrying a pregnancy. Conclusion. To increase the effectiveness of ART in patients with reduced ovarian reserve, etiological factor should be taken into account when selecting the optimal protocol for ovarian stimulation. Age is a decisive factor in the outcomes of ART in this group of patients. Key words: infertility, ovarian response, assisted reproductive technologies, ovarian reserve, ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document