scholarly journals The Escherichia coli SOS Response: Much More than DNA Damage Repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zdravko Podlesek ◽  
Darja Žgur Bertok
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Genetic Adaptation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Bacterial Pathogenicity ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Regulator Genes

The Escherichia coli SOS response is an inducible DNA damage repair pathway controlled by two key regulators, LexA, a repressor and RecA, an inducer. Upon DNA damage RecA is activated and stimulates self cleavage of LexA, leading to, in E. coli, derepresion of approximately 50 SOS genes. The response is triggered by exogenous and endogenous signals that bacteria encounter at a number of sites within the host. Nevertheless, besides regulating DNA damage repair the SOS response plays a much broader role. Thus, SOS error prone polymerases promote elevated mutation rates significant for genetic adaptation and diversity, including antibiotic resistance. Here we review the E. coli SOS response in relation to recalcitrance to antimicrobials, including persister and biofilm formation, horizontal gene tranfer, gene mobility, bacterial pathogenicity, as well SOS induced bacteriocins that drive diversification. Phenotypic heterogeneity in expression of the SOS regulator genes, recA and lexA as well as colicin activity genes is also discussed.

scholarly journals The Fanconi anemia DNA damage repair pathway in the spotlight for germline predisposition to colorectal cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1501-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Esteban-Jurado ◽  
◽  
Sebastià Franch-Expósito ◽  
Jenifer Muñoz ◽  
Teresa Ocaña ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Damage Repair

Mutagenesis and More: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS Response

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1599-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley T Smith ◽  
Graham C Walker
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Posttranslational Regulation ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Sos Mutagenesis ◽  
Induced Mutagenesis ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
Increase Cell Survival

Abstract The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and posttranslational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

scholarly journals MicroRNA-146a-5p enhances radiosensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma through replication protein A3-induced activation of the DNA repair pathway

2019 ◽  
Vol 316 (3) ◽  
pp. C299-C311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Luo ◽  
Zhong-Zhou Si ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Jie-Qun Li ◽  
Zhong-Qiang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Hcc Cells

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is known for its high mortality rate worldwide. Based on intensive studies, microRNA (miRNA) expression functions in tumor suppression. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the contribution of miR-146a-5p to radiosensitivity in HCC through the activation of the DNA damage repair pathway by binding to replication protein A3 (RPA3). First, the limma package of R was performed to differentially analyze HCC expression chip, and regulative miRNA of RPA3 was predicted. Expression of miR-146a-5p, RPA3, and DNA damage repair pathway-related factors in tissues and cells was determined. The effects of radiotherapy on the expression of miR-146a-5p and RPA3 as well as on cell radiosensitivity, proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis were also assessed. The results showed that there exists a close correlation between miR-146a and the radiotherapy effect on HCC progression through regulation of RPA3 and the DNA repair pathway. The positive rate of ATM, pCHK2, and Rad51 in HCC tissues was higher when compared with that of the paracancerous tissues. SMMC-7721 and HepG2 cell proliferation were significantly inhibited following 8 Gy 6Mv dose. MiR-146a-5p restrained the expression of RPA3 and promoted the expression of relative genes associated with the DNA repair pathway. In addition, miR-146a-5p overexpression suppresses cell proliferation and enhances radiosensitivity and cell apoptosis in HCC cells. In conclusion, the present study revealed that miR-146a-5p could lead to the restriction of proliferation and the promotion of radiosensitivity and apoptosis in HCC cells through activation of DNA repair pathway and inhibition of RPA3.

ATM as a biomarker for DNA damage repair deficiency in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Talia Golan ◽  
Sharon Halparin ◽  
Chani Stossel ◽  
Maria Raitses-Gurevich ◽  
Dikla Atias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Nuclear Staining ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
History Of ◽  
Atm Protein

308 Background: Approximately 15% of PDAC tumors display DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency. Germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation serves as a robust biomarker for the DDR deficiency. A subset of patients displays a similar clinical phenotype but lack the gBRCA mutation. Identification of these BRCA-like subset of patients remains a challenge and an alternative approach may include DDR functional assays. Here we suggest loss of the ATM protein as one of the biomarkers for the identification of the DDR deficiency signature in PDAC. Methods: Patients were identified from the Sheba pancreatic cancer database based on strong family/personal history of BRCA- associated cancers or a durable response to platinum containing regimens ( ≥ 6 month) or harboring germline/somatic mutations in the DNA repair pathway (excluding gBRCA mutation). Archival FFPE blocks of primary tumors/metastatic lesions were used to explore ATM protein expression by IHC. Nuclear staining was regarded as positive. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes served as an internal positive control. ATM loss was defined as less than10% neoplastic nuclear staining at any intensity in the presence of positive lymphocytes staining. Results: We identified 53 patients with DDR deficiency phenotype between 2014-2016 from the Sheba PDAC database (n = 250). Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (46-81) and the majority were female (62%). 47% were diagnosed at stage I/II and 53% stage IV. In the subgroup of patients with DDR deficiency phenotype, 55% displayed a family history of BRCA-associated cancers, 19% had a personal history of malignancy and23% had known mutation in DNA repair pathway. 23/53 identified subjects have been analyzed to date. We identified 52% loss of ATM in the analyzed group (n = 23). Conclusions: Loss of ATM in an unselected PDAC population is 12% (H. Kim et al, 2014). Our data demonstrate that 52% of the highly selected subgroup of PDAC patients (DDR deficiency phenotype) was found to have loss of ATM protein expression, suggesting it to be one of the biomarker for DDR signature. Identification of these patients, based on ATM protein expression profile may lead to personalized treatment options.

scholarly journals DNA Damage Repair and Drug Efflux as Potential Targets for Reversing Low or Intermediate Ciprofloxacin Resistance in E. coli K-12

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus N. Klitgaard ◽  
Bimal Jana ◽  
Luca Guardabassi ◽  
Karen L. Nielsen ◽  
Anders Løbner-Olesen
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Drug Efflux ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Ciprofloxacin Resistance ◽  
K 12
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document