scholarly journals Evaluating the Effects of Spraying Oxytetracycline on Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholam Hosein Kazemzadeh ◽  
Hasan Ravari ◽  
Masomeh Nabavizadeh ◽  
Saeid Pasban Noghabi

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) can be created due to neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease in the lower limbs. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of spraying oxytetracycline on DFU. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 diabetic patients suffering from DFU. The patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups of intervention and control (n = 30 each). While all subjects received antibiotic therapy, blood sugar control, and, if necessary debridement, the intervention group received oxytetracycline spraying on the DFUs twice a day. After the intervention, the patients were visited every week (for three weeks), photos were taken of the DFUs by special software, and the size of the DFUs was checked. The DFUs were also studied in terms of purulent discharge, the smell, and erythema, and edema around the ulcer. After three weeks, the healing of ulcers were compared in the two groups. Data were gathered and analyzed using the SPSS software version 11.5, descriptive statistical test, chi-square, and t-test. Results: Before the study, the size of the DFUs in the intervention and control groups was 110.87 ± 38.3 and 127.12 ± 40 mm2, respectively. After the treatment, the alterations in the intervention group in the first, second, and third weeks were 14.90 ± 14.41, 26.93 ± 18.86, and 41.25 ± 19.51, respectively. Also, in the control group, the alterations were 19.45 ± 1.35, 23.78 ± 5.31, and 13.29 ± 8.75, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the size of DFUs between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: According to the results, spraying oxytetracycline on DFUs facilitated the process of healing. Thus, it can be used as an affordable, available, and effective method.

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinedum Ogbonnaya Eleazu ◽  
Aniza Abd Aziz ◽  
Tay Chuu Suen ◽  
Lam Chun-Hau ◽  
Chin Elynn ◽  
...  

Purpose This study aims to design to assess the traditional, complementary and alternate medicine (TCAM) usage and its association with the quality of life (QOL) of Type 2 diabetic patients in a tertiary hospital (Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia) in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach A total of 300 respondents included in this study were divided into the following two major categories: TCAM (34.33% of respondents) and non-TCAM users (65.67% of the respondents), respectively. The mean ages of the respondents were 59.3 ± 10.2 for the TCAM users and 57.7 ± 12.0 for the non-TCAM users. Findings A greater percentage of non-TCAM users reported poor control of diabetes (14.7%) and blood glucose (55.8%) compared with the TCAM users (9.7% and 48.5%, respectively). Further, the diabetic patients on TCAM reported lower rates of coma, stroke and kidney problems but higher rates of diabetic foot ulcers, heart diseases and retinopathy than the non-TCAM users. Additionally, the diabetic patients with TCAM usage had a significantly better physical (p = 0.02) and overall (p = 0.03) qualities of life compared to the non-TCAM users. However, psychological, social and environmental health did not show any significant difference. Originality/value The prevalence of TCAM usage among diabetic patients was lower than in other comparable studies. Diabetic patients on TCAM reported lower rates of coma, stroke and kidney problems but higher rates of diabetic foot ulcers, heart diseases and retinopathy than the non-TCAM users. Further, diabetes patients on TCAM reported better QOL compared to non-TCAM users especially in terms of physical health.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 100178
Author(s):  
Seyedeh Esmat Hosseini ◽  
Behnam Molavi ◽  
Alireza Goodarzi ◽  
Ahad Alizadeh ◽  
Alireza Yousefzadeh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahriar Mirpour ◽  
Sara Fathollah ◽  
Parvin Mansouri ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
Mahmood Ghoranneviss ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar J. Peters ◽  
Lawrence A. Lavery ◽  
David G. Armstrong ◽  
John G. Fleischli

Author(s):  
Sahar Moeini ◽  
Hans Gottlieb ◽  
Tue S. Jørgensen ◽  
Malene R. B. Larsen ◽  
Stig Brorson

Chronic foot ulcers have extensive consequences for diabetic patients’ quality of life and increase risks of amputation and death. The aim of this trial was to assess the feasibility of conducting a larger clinical trial to evaluate the clinical effect of inforatio technique on healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Inforatio technique is a novel minimal invasive procedure where small cuts are made on wound beds with punch biopsy tools. This study was a feasibility trial conducted at an outpatient wound care clinic at Zealand University Hospital. Twelve patients with DFUs were included. During a 90-day follow-up, participants visited the clinic 5 times and received inforatio technique twice. Feasibility was assessed with regard to recruitment, acceptability, burden, benefits, protocol adherence, and adverse events. The recruitment rate was 1 patient per eighth day (95% confidence interval [CI] = [4th-13th]), and the retention rate was 100% (95% CI = [74-100]). During follow-up, healing was observed for 4 ulcers (33%, 95% CI = [10-65]) with a mean time for healing of 59 days (range, 22-89) (95% CI = [5-113]). Five ulcers had a reduction of wound area and 3 ulcers had an increase in area from baseline to 90-day follow-up. No temporal relationship was found between inforatio application and wound area increase. There were no patient-reported harmful effects and no adverse events with probable relation to inforatio technique. Patient acceptability and participant adherence were promising. Thus, a larger clinical trial for evaluating the clinical effect of inforatio technique is considered feasible to conduct.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Hashemi Shiri ◽  
Esmaeil Raiatdoost ◽  
Hamid Afkhami ◽  
Ruhollah Ravanshad ◽  
Seyed Ehsan Hosseini ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundGiven the COVID-19 pandemic’s, researchers are beseeched for effective treatments. Herbal medicine is also queried for potential supplementary treatments for COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the effects of Sugarcane, Black Myrobalan, and Mastic herbal medications for COVID-19 patients.MethodsThis was a double-blinded randomized clinical trial study conducted over three months from May to July 2020 in patients admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19 in Peymaniyeh Hospital in Jahrom, Iran. The intervention group received the treatment protocol approved by the Ministry of Health of Iran during the period of hospitalization and the herbal supplement obtained from the combination of black myrobalan and mastic and sugarcane, twice a day (3g of herbal supplements). All patients were compared in terms of demographic variables, vital signs, clinical and laboratory variables.Results72 patients with COVID-19, divided into intervention (n=37) and control (n=35) groups. intervention and control groups had not any significant difference in terms of baseline characteristics. The time-to-event analysis revealed a significant difference in 4 symptoms of cough, fever, dyspnea, and myalgia (P<0.05). The Control group had a significantly lower decrease in C-reactive protein during 7 days (P<0.05). Patients in the herbal supplement group were hospitalized for 4.12 days and in the control group were hospitalized for 8.37 days (P=0.001). ICU admission and death only happened in 3 (8.6%) patients of the control group.ConclusionWhile advanced studies with more sample size are needed; the proposed combination seems to be effective in the symptom treatment and reducing the length of hospitalization.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 3492
Author(s):  
Said El Mallah ◽  
Abd El Moniem Fareed ◽  
Omar M. Abd Al-Halim Ghaly

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in healing of chronic foot ulcers in patients with type II diabetes mellitus.Methods: A case control study included 40 type II diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcers not healing for more than 4 weeks. It has been conducted at Naser Institute for Research and Treatment and Menoufia University Hospital during the period between April 2017 and September 2018. Patients with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers were referred by physicians and were also identified through a number of wound care clinics in various hospitals.Results: Most ulcers were observed in the sole and heel in both groups A and B (n=14 and 9 respectively), while the rest of ulcers were distributed in other areas of the foot, namely the medial and lateral malleoli, dorsum and toes. On comparing the wound related complications developing during the treatment period, no statistically significant difference was found between both groups (p=0.147). As regards Wagner's grade, 7 patients (17.5%) had grade 4 ulcers, 18 patients (45%) had grade 3 ulcers and 15 patients (37.5%) had grade 2 ulcers, showing no statistically significant difference between both groups before treatment (p=0.259).Conclusions: HBOT is a useful adjunct in the treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers, and that the cost of HBOT itself will be reduced as it becomes more widely available in the clinical setting, and as further knowledge of its other advantages, such as limited side effects and relative safety, become more widely appreciated. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document