scholarly journals Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A New Standard of Care

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale Ding
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy

Revascularization and functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in elderly patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1182-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie E. Andrews ◽  
Nikolaos Mouchtouris ◽  
Evan M. Fitchett ◽  
Fadi Al Saiegh ◽  
Michael J. Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Success Of Treatment

OBJECTIVEMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is now the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large-vessel occlusion, but there remains a question of whether elderly patients benefit from this procedure to the same degree as the younger populations enrolled in the seminal trials on MT. The authors compared outcomes after MT of patients 80–89 and ≥ 90 years old with AIS to those of younger patients.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed records of patients undergoing MT at their institution to examine stroke severity, comorbid conditions, medical management, recanalization results, and clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare patients < 80 years, 80–89 years, and ≥ 90 years old.RESULTSAll groups had similar rates of comorbid disease and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, and stroke severity did not differ significantly between groups. Elderly patients had equivalent recanalization outcomes, with similar rates of readmission, 30-day mortality, and hospital-associated complications. These patients were more likely to have poor clinical outcome on discharge, as defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3–6, but this difference was not significant when controlled for stroke severity, tPA administration, and recanalization results.CONCLUSIONSOctogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians with AIS have similar rates of mortality, hospital readmission, and hospital-associated complications as younger patients after MT. Elderly patients also have the capacity to achieve good functional outcome after MT, but this potential is moderated by stroke severity and success of treatment.

Predictors of 30-day mortality after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Jen Chen ◽  
Tzu-Ying Chuang ◽  
Leslie Hansen ◽  
Shourik Dutta ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy

scholarly journals Comparison of non–stent retriever and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy devices for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate A. Hentschel ◽  
Badih Daou ◽  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
Shannon Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Stent Retriever ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Stent Retrievers

OBJECTIVE Mechanical thrombectomy is standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, limited data are available from assessment of outcomes of FDA-approved devices. The objective of this study is to compare clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety of non–stent retriever and stent retriever thrombectomy devices. METHODS Between January 2008 and June 2014, 166 patients treated at Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience for acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy using Merci, Penumbra, Solitaire, or Trevo devices were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI score]), and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression determined predictors of mRS Score 3–6, mortality, and TICI Score 3. RESULTS A total of 99 patients were treated with non–stent retriever devices (Merci and Penumbra) and 67 with stent retrievers (Solitaire and Trevo). Stent retrievers yielded lower 90-day NIH Stroke Scale scores and higher rates of 90-day mRS scores ≤ 2 (22.54% [non–stent retriever] vs 61.67% [stent retriever]; p < 0.001), TICI Score 2b–3 recanalization rates (79.80% [non–stent retriever] vs 97.01% [stent retriever]; p < 0.001), percentage of parenchyma salvaged, and discharge rates to home/rehabilitation. The overall incidence of ICH was also significantly lower (40.40% [non–stent retriever] vs 13.43% [stent retriever]; p = 0.002), with a trend toward lower 90-day mortality. Use of non–stent retriever devices was an independent predictor of mRS Scores 3–6 (p = 0.002), while use of stent retrievers was an independent predictor of TICI Score 3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy devices achieve higher recanalization rates than non–stent retriever devices in acute ischemic stroke with improved clinical and radiographic outcomes and safety.

Abstract WP32: Introducing STAR: A Multicenter International Collaborative Registry of Real-World Outcomes After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali M Alawieh ◽  
Shakeel Chowdhry ◽  
Italo Linfante ◽  
Jonathan Grossberg ◽  
Benjamin Gory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Real World ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Treatment Level ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute stroke is the current standard of care treatment. Level 1 evidence for efficacy of thrombectomy has been established in multiple randomized controlled trials on selective patient populations; however, the high effect size of MT had led multiple centers in the US and globally to expand their patient selection to include populations that were not studied in major trials. To provide ongoing data on MT outcomes in different patient populations from the real-world, we have initiated an international multicenter initiative, STAR (Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry). Methods: STAR is a multicenter and international platform to curate patient outcome data after MT for acute ischemic stroke at comprehensive stroke centers. STAR includes all patients who underwent MT for acute ischemic stroke irrespective of age, time from onset, ASPECT score, and NIHSS. Patients were curated from 01/2015 to date and is prospectively maintained. Patient charts are reviewed for demographics, baseline functioning, and admission deficits. Procedure notes are reviewed for technical variables and technical outcomes. Clinical outcomes were collected at 90-day follow-up by stroke neurologist. Results: A total of 24 centers globally have enrolled in STAR. By December 2018, the total number of enrolled and verified patients in STAR was 3,850 (mean age 69±14, 51% females). Anterior circulation strokes were treated in 89% of cases, average NIHSS on admission was 15.5±7, and 73% had pre-stroke mRS below 2. Around 51% of patients received IV-tPA. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed using aspiration (45%), stent retriever (28%), primary combined approach (24%) or intracranial stenting (3%). Successful recanalization was achieved in 84% of cases, the rate of favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was 41%, and mortality was 25%. Complication rate was 6% and rate of symptomatic post-procedural hemorrhage was 6%. Conclusions: STAR represent a large real-world international registry for outcomes after MT, and constitutes a statistically robust platform to study real-world practice outcome in patient sub-populations that are under-represented in randomized trials. Link: https://medicine.musc.edu/departments/neurosurgery/star

scholarly journals Update in the Early Management and Reperfusion Strategies of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo A. Mendez ◽  
Edgar A. Samaniego ◽  
Sunil A. Sheth ◽  
Sudeepta Dandapat ◽  
David M. Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability. The paradigms on prehospital care, reperfusion therapies, and postreperfusion management of patients with AIS continue to evolve. After the publication of pivotal clinical trials, endovascular thrombectomy has become part of the standard of care in selected cases of AIS since 2015. New stroke guidelines have been recently published, and the time window for mechanical thrombectomy has now been extended up to 24 hours. This review aims to provide a focused up-to-date review for the early management of adult patients with AIS and introduce the new upcoming areas of ongoing research.

scholarly journals Endovascular Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment with FlowGate Balloon Guide Catheter: A Single-Center Observational Study of FlowGate Balloon Guide Catheter Use

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed S. Teleb
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Number Of Passes ◽  
Single Center Observational Study

Background: Treatment of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke with mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care after recent clinical trials. However, the degree of recanalization with stent retrievers remains very important in overall outcomes. We sought to review the utility of a new balloon guide catheter (BGC) in improving the degree of recanalization in conjunction with mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: The medical records of a prospectively collected endovascular ischemic stroke database were reviewed. All consecutive strokes when a FlowGate BGC was used with a thrombectomy stent retriever were identified. Use of a FlowGate BGC, number of passes, final Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score, trackability, and use of adjunct devices were all collected and analyzed. Results: Use of a FlowGate BGC resulted in 64% (33/52) first-pass effect (FPE) of TICI 2b/3, and specifically 46% (24/52) TICI 3 FPE (true FPE). A total of 52/62 (84%) of thrombectomy cases were treated with BGCs. In the remaining 10, the BGC was not inflated or used due to the clot not being visualized or the lesions being distal and BGC use thus not deemed appropriate. Adjunct use of an aspiration catheter was seen in 12% (6/52) of cases. The overall success with FlowGate BGCs with one or more passes of TICI 2b/3 was 94% (49/52). Trackability was achieved in 92% (57/62) of cases. Conclusions: Use of the FlowGate BGC as an adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy was associated with good FPE and an overall recanalization of TICI 2b/3 of 94%.

Large Vessel Occlusion

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Y. Chong ◽  
Michael P. Lerario
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stent Retrievers ◽  
Iv Tpa

Select patients who are not eligible for IV tPA, or who do not recanalize with IV thrombolysis alone, may be treated with acute endovascular therapies within a 6-hour window. Mechanical thrombectomy, with or without intra-arterial tPA, has recently been shown to be effective in treating acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Intra-arterial therapy using approved stent retrievers has become the standard of care for acute large vessel occlusion.

Drivers of variation in 90-day episode payments after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016389
Author(s):  
Badih J Daou ◽  
Monica L Yost ◽  
John D Syrjamaki ◽  
Kelsey J Fearer ◽  
Sravanthi Koduri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Discharge Care ◽  
Insured Patients

BackgroundAlthough mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke from a large vessel occlusion is now the standard of care, little is known about cost variations in stroke patients following thrombectomy and factors that influence these variations.MethodsWe evaluated claims data for 2016 to 2018 for thrombectomy-performing hospitals within Michigan through a registry that includes detailed episode payment information for both Medicare and privately insured patients. We aimed to analyze price-standardized and risk-adjusted 90-day episode payments in patients who underwent thrombectomy. Hospitals were grouped into three payment terciles for comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out using unpaired t-test, Chi-square, and ANOVA tests.Results1076 thrombectomy cases treated at 16 centers were analyzed. The average 90-day episode payment by hospital ranged from $53 046 to $81,767, with a mean of $65 357. A $20 467 difference (35.1%) existed between the high and low payment hospital terciles (P<0.0001), highlighting a significant payment variation across hospital terciles. The primary drivers of payment variation were related to post-discharge care which accounted for 38% of the payment variation (P=0.0058, inter-tercile range $11,977–$19,703) and readmissions accounting for 26% (P=0.016, inter-tercile range $3,315–$7,992). This was followed by professional payments representing 20% of the variation (P<0.0001, inter-tercile range $7525–$9,922), while index hospitalization payment was responsible for only 16% of the 90-day episode payment variation (P=0.10, inter-tercile range $35,432–$41,099).ConclusionsThere is a wide variation in 90-day episode payments for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy across centers. The main drivers of payment variation are related to differences in post-discharge care and readmissions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document