Familial Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia: Histopathology and Survival in 30 Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (11) ◽  
pp. 1366-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin O. Leslie ◽  
Carlyne D. Cool ◽  
Thomas A. Sporn ◽  
Douglas Curran-Everett ◽  
Mark P. Steele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Age At Death ◽  
Diagnostic Features ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease ◽  
Fibroblast Foci

Context.—Familial idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (F-IIP) describes the unexplained occurrence of diffuse parenchymal lung disease in related individuals. Prevailing wisdom suggests that the histopathology of F-IIP is indistinguishable from that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, namely, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Objective.—To define the histopathology of F-IIP in lung tissue samples. Design.—Tissue sections from 30 patients with F-IIP, enrolled in a national research program, were evaluated by 3 pulmonary pathologists using 15 predefined histopathologic features. Each feature was recorded independently before a final diagnosis was chosen from a limited list dichotomized between UIP or “not UIP.” These 2 groups were then compared to survival. Results.—The consensus diagnosis for the F-IIP cohort was an unclassifiable parenchymal fibrosis (60%), with a high incidence of histopathologic honeycombing, fibroblast foci, and smooth muscle in fibrosis. Usual interstitial pneumonia, strictly defined, was identified in less than half of the F-IIP cases (range, 23%–50%). Interobserver agreement was fair (κ  =  0.37) for 2 observers for the overall diagnosis of UIP. Findings unexpected in UIP were prevalent. The survival for the entire F-IIP cohort was poor, with an estimated mortality of 93% and a median age at death of 60.9 years. Subjects with UIP had a shorter survival and younger age at death. Conclusions.—Pulmonary fibrosis was the dominant histopathology identified in our patients, but diagnostic features of UIP were seen in less than 50% of the samples. Overall survival was poor, with mortality accelerated apparently by the presence of a UIP pattern of disease.

scholarly journals Probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on chest CT: is it sufficient for a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1802465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Fukihara ◽  
Yasuhiro Kondoh ◽  
Kevin K. Brown ◽  
Tomoki Kimura ◽  
Kensuke Kataoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Made In

Recent studies have suggested that in patients with an idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), a probable usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on chest computed tomography (CT) is sufficient to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) without histopathology.We retrospectively compared the prognosis and time to first acute exacerbation (AE) in IIP patients with a UIP and a probable UIP pattern on initial chest CT.One hundred and sixty IIP patients with a UIP pattern and 242 with a probable UIP pattern were identified. Probable UIP pattern was independently associated with longer survival time (adjusted hazard ratio 0.713, 95% CI 0.536–0.950; p=0.021) and time to first AE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.580, 95% CI 0.389–0.866; p=0.008). In subjects with a probable UIP pattern who underwent surgical lung biopsy, the probability of a histopathological UIP pattern was 83%. After multidisciplinary discussion and the inclusion of longitudinal behaviour, a diagnosis of IPF was made in 66% of cases. In IPF patients, survival time and time to first AE were not associated with CT pattern. Among subjects with a probable UIP pattern, compared to non-IPF patients, survival time and time to first AE were shorter in IPF patients.In conclusion, IIP patients with a probable UIP pattern on initial chest CT had a better prognosis and longer time to first AE than those with a UIP pattern. However, when baseline data and longitudinal behaviour provided a final diagnosis of IPF, CT pattern was not associated with these outcomes. This suggests diagnostic heterogeneity among patients with a probable UIP pattern.

scholarly journals Familial pulmonary fibrosis: a heterogeneous spectrum of presentations

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Beatriz Hortense ◽  
Marcel Koenigkam dos Santos ◽  
Danilo Wada ◽  
Alexandre Todorovic Fabro ◽  
Mariana Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Lung Tissue ◽  
Pulmonary Function Tests ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
History Of ◽  
Predicted Values ◽  
Fibrotic Lung Diseases ◽  
Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the clinical, functional, and radiological features of index cases of familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) in Brazil. Methods: We evaluated 35 patients with FPF - of whom 18 (51.4%) were women - with a median age of 66.0 years (range, 35.5-89.3 years). All of the patients completed a standardized questionnaire, as well as undergoing pulmonary function tests and HRCT of the chest. In 6 cases, lung tissue samples were obtained: from surgical biopsies in 5 cases; and from an autopsy in 1 case. Results: A history of smoking and a history of exposure to birds or mold were reported in 45.7% and 80.0% of the cases, respectively. Cough and marked dyspnea were reported by 62.8% and 48.6% of the patients, respectively. Fine crackles were detected in 91.4% of the patients. In 4 patients, the findings were suspicious for telomere disease. The median FVC and DLCO, as percentages of the predicted values, were 64.9% (range, 48.8-105.7%) and 38.9% (range, 16.0-60.0%), respectively. Nine patients had reduced DLCO despite having normal spirometry results. Regarding HRCT, patterns typical of usual interstitial pneumonia were found in 6 patients (17.1%). In 25 cases (71.5%), the HRCT features were consistent with a diagnosis other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In 11 cases (31.4%), the radiological patterns were uncharacteristic of interstitial lung disease. Of the six lung tissue samples analyzed, four showed interstitial pneumonia with bronchiolocentric accentuation, and, on the basis of the clinical and radiological data, the corresponding patients were diagnosed with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Conclusions: Patients with FPF can present with a wide variety of clinical features. Most HRCT scans of these patients exhibit patterns not typical of usual interstitial pneumonia. The family history of fibrotic lung diseases should be investigated in all patients under suspicion, regardless of their age.

scholarly journals POS1435 CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION IN A COHORT OF ILD PATIENTS WITH FEATURES OF AUTOIMMUNITY: ARE IPAF CRITERIA SUFFICIENT?

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1002.1-1002
Author(s):  
F. Bozzao ◽  
P. Tomietto ◽  
E. Baratella ◽  
F. Giudici ◽  
M. Kodric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Radiological Progression ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Functional Deterioration ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Background:It is unknown whether patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and only some features of autoimmunity have a different natural history from those with a defined connective tissue disease (CTD-ILD). The classification criteria for “ILD with autoimmune features” (IPAF) may not be able to characterize all these patients, especially those with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern [1].Objectives:To determine clinical characteristics and predictive factors for progression in a cohort of ILD patients with features of autoimmunity, through the application of classification criteria for IPAF and specific CTD, whenever possible.Methods:We retrospectively selected a cohort of consecutive patients with ILD as onset manifestation and features of autoimmunity (at least 1 autoantibody and/or 1 clinical sign/symptom), evaluated by our multidisciplinary unit from March 2009 to March 2020. All the final diagnoses were revised according to the latest CTD and IPAF criteria. Patients were followed up for 33 (16.5-69.5) months.Results:Of the 101 patients enrolled (67.4±10.9 yrs, F/M ratio 65/36), 53 (52.5%) and 37 (36.6%) respectively satisfied the CTD and IPAF criteria. Eleven patients (10.9%) did not satisfy IPAF criteria because of only 1 item (clinical or serologic) within the IPAF domains and a UIP pattern; we defined this group as “autoimmune” UIP (AI-UIP). All the 8 patients initially classified as undifferentiated CTD had sufficient IPAF criteria. Among the IPAF patients (68.2±10.1 years, F/M ratio 20/17), the most common findings were: Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern (56.8%), antinuclear antibodies positivity (43.2%) and arthritis (24.3%). The combination of a positive morphologic and serologic domain was the most common to reach the diagnosis (48.6%). Some IPAF patients had features not included in IPAF criteria, such as non-anti-synthetase myositis-specific antibodies (21.6%), objective sicca syndrome (13.5%) and anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies (2.7%). Over a median of 17 months, 2 IPAF patients (5.4%) developed a definite UIP pattern, while 4 (10.8%) a specific CTD. Comparing the IPAF, CTD-ILD and AI-UIP groups, no statistically significant differences were found in the mean age, sex distribution, smoking habits and mean duration of the disease. However, IPAF patients had a significantly higher prevalence of arterial hypertension and left-sided heart failure and a lower predominance of UIP pattern as expected (10.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 100%, p<0.01). Although no differences were found at the diagnosis, at 1 year the proportion of IPAF patients with radiological progression of the fibrosis and/or functional deterioration (defined by a decline in FVC of ≥ 10% and/or DLCO of ≥ 15% predicted) was lower to that of CTD-ILD and AI-UIP (17.1% vs. 31.4% vs. 63.6%, p 0.01). Fewer IPAF patients needed oxygen support (8.6% vs. 31.4% vs. 36.4, p 0.02). Considering the overall 101 patients, having an IPAF and a UIP pattern respectively predicted a slower (OR: 0.37, p 0.04) and a faster (OR: 3.56, p 0.01) ILD progression at the multivariate analysis.Conclusion:In our cohort, IPAF criteria were useful to identify a subset of patients with a slower ILD progression and a possible evolution to CTD (10-15% of cases) [2]. These criteria do not characterize all the patients with a UIP pattern and limited features of autoimmunity, which seem to have a worse prognosis, independently from the final diagnosis. Further studies are needed to clarify if the prognosis of AI-UIP is different from that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.References:[1]Graney, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019;16(5):525-33.[2]Sebastiani, et al. Biomedicines 2021,9,17.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

AB0528 CHARACTERIZATION OF ANTI-MPO POSITIVE INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE. CLINICAL-SEROLOGIC AND RADIOLOGIC FEATURES AND SURVIVAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1561-1562
Author(s):  
G. Cassone ◽  
G. Dei ◽  
G. Sambataro ◽  
A. Manfredi ◽  
S. Cerri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Pulmonary Involvement ◽  
Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis ◽  
Radiologic Features

Background:Prevalence of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) in patient with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ranges from 1 to 35%, mainly anti-MPO. The presence of ANCA positivity seems to be a poorer prognostic factor in patient with IPF, and some of these patients will develop clinical vasculitis (7-23%).Unfortunately, the majority of the available studies on this topic are retrospective and the real natural history of the disease remains poorly understood.Objectives:Aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, serological and radiologic features of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and positivity for anti-MPO, and to evaluate the survival of this population compared with IPF patients.Methods:We retrospectively analysed 30 patients with ILD and anti-MPO antibodies, without diagnosis of vasculitis, from 3 different rheumatology-pulmonology Italian Center.For each patient, clinical, radiologic and serological data were evaluated. Treatments were also collected, both immunosuppressants or antifibrotic agents.Finally, survival of ILD-MPO patients and of 90 unselected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients was compared.Results:Thirty patients were enrolled in the study (see table for the characteristics of the patients).Fibrosing pneumonia was described in 73.3% of patients (usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP] in 19 patients), and 10 patients (33.3%) received antifibrotic drugs, all with UIP pattern. Of interest, 7 patients were treated with immunosuppressants (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil), independently by the ILD pattern and 21 (70%) low dosage of steroids.After a median period of 23.5 months (range 11-111), 7 patients developed an ANCA associated vasculitis, while other 3 developed other rheumatic diseases.Finally, when compared with IPF, ILD-MPO patients had a better survival (81.2%±0.9 vs 54.7±0.7 for ILD-MPO and IPF, respectively; p=0.045)Conclusion:ILD positive for anti-MPO antibodies are still a not definite condition. We need larger population to identify possible markers for the evolution in an ANCA associated vasculitis, to define the prognosis of disease and the better therapeutic approach.References: :[1]Mohammad AJ, et al. Pulmonary Involvement in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)-associated Vasculitis: The Influence of ANCA Subtype. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:1458-67Table.Serological, clinical and radiological features of anti-MPO + interstitial lung diseaseNumber30Males/female15/15Median age (years + IQR)68 (17)Median follow-up (months + IQR)39.5 (61)Smoke36.70%ILD pattern Usual interstitial pneumonia63.30% Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia16.70% Hipersensitivity pneumonia10% Other fibrosing pneumonia10%Median FVC (% + IQR)83 (23)Median DLCO (% + IQR)53 (28)Clinical features Raynaud’s phenomenon7.70% Sicca syndrome0 Arthralgias20% Arthritis3.40%Serology Antinuclear antibodies30.80% Anti-extractable nuclear antibodies (ENA)8% Anti-SSA4% Rheumatoid factor21.40%Therapy Immusuppressants23.30% Anti-fibrotic drugs33.30%Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Chest Imaging ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 453-457
Author(s):  
Cylen Javidan-Nejad
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Interstitial Lung Diseases ◽  
Pathologic Diagnosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) represents one of the most common chronic interstitial lung diseases. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the pathologic diagnosis of IPF and can be diagnosed when honeycombing is present with a basilar and peripheral predominance and findings not typical of UIP are absent. In the current era, when a diagnosis of UIP is made with confidence on HRCT, biopsy can be avoided. Yet, one must be familiar with mimics of UIP/IPF (most notably pulmonary edema superimposed on emphysema) to avoid confusion misdiagnosis. Radiologists must also be familiar with potential complications of UIP including progression, infection, accelerated fibrosis (which can be lethal) and primary lung cancer (which has an increased incidence in UIP).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document