scholarly journals POS1435 CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR PROGRESSION IN A COHORT OF ILD PATIENTS WITH FEATURES OF AUTOIMMUNITY: ARE IPAF CRITERIA SUFFICIENT?

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1002.1-1002
Author(s):  
F. Bozzao ◽  
P. Tomietto ◽  
E. Baratella ◽  
F. Giudici ◽  
M. Kodric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Radiological Progression ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Functional Deterioration ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Background:It is unknown whether patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and only some features of autoimmunity have a different natural history from those with a defined connective tissue disease (CTD-ILD). The classification criteria for “ILD with autoimmune features” (IPAF) may not be able to characterize all these patients, especially those with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern [1].Objectives:To determine clinical characteristics and predictive factors for progression in a cohort of ILD patients with features of autoimmunity, through the application of classification criteria for IPAF and specific CTD, whenever possible.Methods:We retrospectively selected a cohort of consecutive patients with ILD as onset manifestation and features of autoimmunity (at least 1 autoantibody and/or 1 clinical sign/symptom), evaluated by our multidisciplinary unit from March 2009 to March 2020. All the final diagnoses were revised according to the latest CTD and IPAF criteria. Patients were followed up for 33 (16.5-69.5) months.Results:Of the 101 patients enrolled (67.4±10.9 yrs, F/M ratio 65/36), 53 (52.5%) and 37 (36.6%) respectively satisfied the CTD and IPAF criteria. Eleven patients (10.9%) did not satisfy IPAF criteria because of only 1 item (clinical or serologic) within the IPAF domains and a UIP pattern; we defined this group as “autoimmune” UIP (AI-UIP). All the 8 patients initially classified as undifferentiated CTD had sufficient IPAF criteria. Among the IPAF patients (68.2±10.1 years, F/M ratio 20/17), the most common findings were: Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern (56.8%), antinuclear antibodies positivity (43.2%) and arthritis (24.3%). The combination of a positive morphologic and serologic domain was the most common to reach the diagnosis (48.6%). Some IPAF patients had features not included in IPAF criteria, such as non-anti-synthetase myositis-specific antibodies (21.6%), objective sicca syndrome (13.5%) and anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies (2.7%). Over a median of 17 months, 2 IPAF patients (5.4%) developed a definite UIP pattern, while 4 (10.8%) a specific CTD. Comparing the IPAF, CTD-ILD and AI-UIP groups, no statistically significant differences were found in the mean age, sex distribution, smoking habits and mean duration of the disease. However, IPAF patients had a significantly higher prevalence of arterial hypertension and left-sided heart failure and a lower predominance of UIP pattern as expected (10.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 100%, p<0.01). Although no differences were found at the diagnosis, at 1 year the proportion of IPAF patients with radiological progression of the fibrosis and/or functional deterioration (defined by a decline in FVC of ≥ 10% and/or DLCO of ≥ 15% predicted) was lower to that of CTD-ILD and AI-UIP (17.1% vs. 31.4% vs. 63.6%, p 0.01). Fewer IPAF patients needed oxygen support (8.6% vs. 31.4% vs. 36.4, p 0.02). Considering the overall 101 patients, having an IPAF and a UIP pattern respectively predicted a slower (OR: 0.37, p 0.04) and a faster (OR: 3.56, p 0.01) ILD progression at the multivariate analysis.Conclusion:In our cohort, IPAF criteria were useful to identify a subset of patients with a slower ILD progression and a possible evolution to CTD (10-15% of cases) [2]. These criteria do not characterize all the patients with a UIP pattern and limited features of autoimmunity, which seem to have a worse prognosis, independently from the final diagnosis. Further studies are needed to clarify if the prognosis of AI-UIP is different from that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.References:[1]Graney, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019;16(5):525-33.[2]Sebastiani, et al. Biomedicines 2021,9,17.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals SAT0535 CLINICAL COURSE IN PATIENTS WITH INTERSTITIAL PNEUMONIA WITH AUTOIMMUNE FEATURES (IPAF) IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONSULTATION.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1225.1-1225
Author(s):  
I. Perez ◽  
C. Vadillo ◽  
M. A. Nieto ◽  
D. Freites ◽  
Z. Rosales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Therapeutic Management ◽  
European Respiratory Society ◽  
Respiratory Impairment ◽  
Radiological Pattern ◽  
Over Time

Background:A proportion of patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) show autoimmune characteristics but do not completely meet the classification criteria for a definitive connective tissue disease. In order to unify the nomenclature and criteria to define this condition, the classification of patients with Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF) has recently been adopted (Fisher, et al).Objectives:To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, functional characteristics and therapeutic management of IPAF patients in clinical practice and to evaluate the incidence rate of functional respiratory impairment over time.Methods:A longitudinal observational study was performed. Patients with IPAF classification criteria (Fischer et al) were included from the time of ILD diagnosis (Feb 2017 to Sept 2018) and followed until loss of follow-up or end of the study (Oct 2019), in a multidisciplinary team, carried by a pneumologist and a rheumatologist in a Tertiary Hospital in Madrid. Main outcome: relative functional respiratory impairment: defined as decline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) of ≥ 5% compared to the previous visit. Respiratory function was measured at baseline and every 6 months. Covariates: a) sociodemographic, b) clinical, c) radiological pattern (non-specific interstitial pneumonia [NSIP]; usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP], others); d) FVC%, DLCO%; e) laboratory tests; f) therapy used (glucorticosteroids, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and Biologic Agents). Statistical analysis: description of the sociodemographic, clinical, radiological, functional and treatment characteristics of the patients. Survival techniques were used to estimate the incidence rate (IR) of relative functional respiratory impairment, expressed per 100 patient-semester with their respective confidence interval [95 % CI].Results:17 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3 ± 1.5 years, 70.6% were women with a mean age of 65±10 years. The most frequent IPAF classification criteria were: a) clinical: arthritis (50%), Raynaud`s phenomenon (33%) and mechanical hands (17%); b) serological: 65% had ANA ≥1/360; 31% FR> 40; 30% Anti-Ro positive; c) morphologic: 59% presented NSIP pattern and 29.4% was UIP. The baseline median FVC% and DLCO% were 89 [83-107.7] and 63 [50-79.8] respectively. During the study period, 94% received treatment: 87.5% glucorticosteroids, 68.5% mycophenolate, 56% azathioprine, 18.7% cyclophosphamide iv and 33% antifibrotics. During the follow-up (104.6 patient - semester), 15 patients presented relative functional respiratory impairment, with an IR of 23.8 [16.1-35.3]. After 14 months from IPAF diagnosis 50% of the patients had relative functional respiratory impairment. At the end of the follow-up, 50% showed a worsening of the DLCO%.Conclusion:IPAF patients are mostly women in their sixties. The most frequent clinical criteria are arthritis and Raynaud`s phenomenon and the serological were FR and ANAs. The most frequent radiological pattern was NSIP. The therapeutic management is mainly with glucorticosteroids, mycophenolate and azathioprine. At the beginning, patients have a slightly diminished lung function. These patients have significant functional impairment over time that will impact in their prognosis. Longitudinal and multicenter studies are necessary to advance in the knowledge and management of these patients.References:[1]Fischer A, Antoniou KM, Brown KK, Cadranel J, Corte TJ, du Bois RM, et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society research statement: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2015 Oct;46(4):976–87. Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26160873Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals THU0305 PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL OUTCOME OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN ANCA ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 381.2-381
Author(s):  
J. Fernandes Serodio ◽  
J. Hernández-Rodríguez ◽  
G. Espígol-Frigolé ◽  
M. Alba ◽  
J. Marco-Hernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis ◽  
Inflammatory Infiltrates

Background:Lung involvement is frequent in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Classical lung manifestations consist of capillaritis with lung haemorrhage, inflammatory infiltrates and nodules. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is increasingly recognized among patients with AAV. However, little is known concerning risk factors and clinical course of these patients.Objectives:The aim of our study was to characterize the prevalence and clinical course of ILD in patients with AAV.Methods:We have performed a clinical retrospective single-centre observational analysis (1990-2019) of all patients with the diagnosis of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) diagnosed according to 2018 Draft Classification Criteria for GPA and MPA1. Demographic, clinical and immunologic data were reviewed. Radiologic pattern of ILD were assessed by high-resolution-CT. Main outcome evaluated was overall-all survival.Results:The study population consisted of 123 patients, 56% female, aged 59.3±18.2 years old at the time of diagnosis. Clinical diagnosis was of MPA in 54% of patients and GPA in 46%. While 108 (88%) ANCA positive patients had PR3 (n=25) or MPO (n=83), 15 (12%) patients had negative or atypical ANCA. Any lung involvement was present in 82 (71%) and ILD was identified in 24 (20%) of all patients. ILD pattern was of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in 12 patients, non-specified interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in 9 and chronic organizing pneumonia (OP) in 3. There was an association between the presence of ILD and ANCA specificity: MPO were present in 100% of patients with UIP and in 75% of patients with NSIP/OP (p=0.017). Bronchiectasis were more prevalent among patients with ILD (19/24; p<0.001). During the median follow-up time period of 68 (23-126) months, mortality was of 42% among patients with ILD-AAV compared with 11% in no ILD-AAV (log-rank p=0.0001). On the multivariate Cox regression model, ILD was an independent predictor of mortality HR 2.95 (95%CI 1.09-7.96; p=0.033).Conclusion:ILD is a frequent manifestation of MPA and GPA patients. The presence of ILD, particularly UIP, is associated with ANCA-MPO and is a predictor of mortality. Therefore, a better management of fibrotic lung involvement in AAV is warranted.References:[1]Robson JC, Grayson PC, Ponte C, et al. Draft classification criteria for the ANCA associated vasculitides. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77 (suppl 2):60-1.Disclosure of Interests:João Fernandes Serodio: None declared, José Hernández-Rodríguez: None declared, Georgina Espígol-Frigolé: None declared, Marco Alba: None declared, Javier Marco-Hernández: None declared, Marcelo Sánchez: None declared, Fernanda Hernández-González: None declared, Jacobo Sellarés: None declared, Maria C. Cid Grant/research support from: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Consultant of: Janssen, Abbvie, Roche, GSK, Speakers bureau: Vifor, Sergio Prieto-González: None declared

scholarly journals Expression of HSP47 in Usual Interstitial Pneumonia and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Kakugawa ◽  
Hiroshi Mukae ◽  
Tomayoshi Hayashi ◽  
Hiroshi Ishii ◽  
Seiko Nakayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

scholarly journals Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy as a Possible Cause of Acute Interstitial Pneumonia in a Patient with Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Jeffrey Moore ◽  
Colm P McParland ◽  
Martin J Bullock ◽  
Yannick Cartier ◽  
Paul Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Diffuse Alveolar Damage ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Present Case Report ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Acute Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

The present case report describes a 44-year-old woman who presented with dyspnea due to diffuse interstitial lung disease. High-resolution computed tomography showed features of usual interstitial pneumonia, but the lung biopsy obtained by video-assisted thoracoscopy was consistent with a histological pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Following the procedure, the patient developed progressive respiratory distress and died on postoperative day 13 with a clinical picture of acute interstitial pneumonia. The autopsy showed evidence of diffuse alveolar damage superimposed on the background pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. The present case report supports the notion that patients with a variety of subtypes of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias may be at risk of exacerbation of their underlying disease following thoracic procedures, including video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy.

scholarly journals Probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on chest CT: is it sufficient for a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1802465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Fukihara ◽  
Yasuhiro Kondoh ◽  
Kevin K. Brown ◽  
Tomoki Kimura ◽  
Kensuke Kataoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Made In

Recent studies have suggested that in patients with an idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), a probable usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on chest computed tomography (CT) is sufficient to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) without histopathology.We retrospectively compared the prognosis and time to first acute exacerbation (AE) in IIP patients with a UIP and a probable UIP pattern on initial chest CT.One hundred and sixty IIP patients with a UIP pattern and 242 with a probable UIP pattern were identified. Probable UIP pattern was independently associated with longer survival time (adjusted hazard ratio 0.713, 95% CI 0.536–0.950; p=0.021) and time to first AE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.580, 95% CI 0.389–0.866; p=0.008). In subjects with a probable UIP pattern who underwent surgical lung biopsy, the probability of a histopathological UIP pattern was 83%. After multidisciplinary discussion and the inclusion of longitudinal behaviour, a diagnosis of IPF was made in 66% of cases. In IPF patients, survival time and time to first AE were not associated with CT pattern. Among subjects with a probable UIP pattern, compared to non-IPF patients, survival time and time to first AE were shorter in IPF patients.In conclusion, IIP patients with a probable UIP pattern on initial chest CT had a better prognosis and longer time to first AE than those with a UIP pattern. However, when baseline data and longitudinal behaviour provided a final diagnosis of IPF, CT pattern was not associated with these outcomes. This suggests diagnostic heterogeneity among patients with a probable UIP pattern.

scholarly journals High-BAL fluid concentrations of RANTES in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia compared with usual interstitial pneumonia

2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
pp. 945-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumako Yoshioka ◽  
Hiroshi Mukae ◽  
Kanako Sugiyama ◽  
Tomoyuki Kakugawa ◽  
Noriho Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

Familial Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia: Histopathology and Survival in 30 Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (11) ◽  
pp. 1366-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin O. Leslie ◽  
Carlyne D. Cool ◽  
Thomas A. Sporn ◽  
Douglas Curran-Everett ◽  
Mark P. Steele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Age At Death ◽  
Diagnostic Features ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease ◽  
Fibroblast Foci

Context.—Familial idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (F-IIP) describes the unexplained occurrence of diffuse parenchymal lung disease in related individuals. Prevailing wisdom suggests that the histopathology of F-IIP is indistinguishable from that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, namely, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Objective.—To define the histopathology of F-IIP in lung tissue samples. Design.—Tissue sections from 30 patients with F-IIP, enrolled in a national research program, were evaluated by 3 pulmonary pathologists using 15 predefined histopathologic features. Each feature was recorded independently before a final diagnosis was chosen from a limited list dichotomized between UIP or “not UIP.” These 2 groups were then compared to survival. Results.—The consensus diagnosis for the F-IIP cohort was an unclassifiable parenchymal fibrosis (60%), with a high incidence of histopathologic honeycombing, fibroblast foci, and smooth muscle in fibrosis. Usual interstitial pneumonia, strictly defined, was identified in less than half of the F-IIP cases (range, 23%–50%). Interobserver agreement was fair (κ  =  0.37) for 2 observers for the overall diagnosis of UIP. Findings unexpected in UIP were prevalent. The survival for the entire F-IIP cohort was poor, with an estimated mortality of 93% and a median age at death of 60.9 years. Subjects with UIP had a shorter survival and younger age at death. Conclusions.—Pulmonary fibrosis was the dominant histopathology identified in our patients, but diagnostic features of UIP were seen in less than 50% of the samples. Overall survival was poor, with mortality accelerated apparently by the presence of a UIP pattern of disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document