scholarly journals Book Review: Not Just Where to Click: Teaching Students How to Think about Information

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Pamela Louderback
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Knowledge Practices ◽  
Literacy Standards

Fifteen years ago, information literacy standards brought information literacy into higher education conversations and advanced the library field. ACRL’s current revision of Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education provides further direction for contextualizing and integrating information literacy into the curriculum and offers a deeper understanding of the knowledge practices and dispositions that an information-literate student should develop. With this in mind, Not Just Where to Click provides recommendations to help librarians develop appropriate resources, practices, and assessment instruments for information literacy.

scholarly journals Bridging the Knowledge Gap between Secondary and Higher Education

2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zorana Ercegovac
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
High School ◽  
Secondary Schools ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Collaborative Work ◽  
School Level ◽  
High School Level ◽  
Educational Levels ◽  
Physics Teacher ◽  
Literacy Standards

This article suggests several intersections for possible collaboration among different educational levels and disciplines. It describes some of the collaborative work between a physics teacher and a librarian at a high school level. In particular, science-integrated information literacy competencies have been selected that may easily be mapped to, and extended for, higher education. The paper concludes with directions for further study and a crossover between information literacy standards for secondary schools and colleges.

scholarly journals Recycling C.R.A.P.: Reframing a Popular Research Mnemonic for Library Instruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. LeBlanc ◽  
Barbara Quintiliano
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
American Association ◽  
Library Instruction ◽  
Mnemonic Device ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Student Reflection ◽  
Literacy Standards ◽  
Core Concepts ◽  
Flexible Framework

In 2015 the American Association of College & Research Libraries jettisoned its long-standing set of Information Literacy Standards for Higher Education and adopted the richer, more flexible Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Composed of core concepts rather than prescriptive objectives, the Framework more closely mirrors the complexity of the rapidly evolving academic environment and encourages engagement on the part of students. However, many instruction librarians find that the Frame’s flexibility also poses pedagogical challenges. The authors describe how instruction librarians at one university library have adapted and used a popular mnemonic device when presenting the Frames, thus promoting greater student reflection and interaction.

scholarly journals Information literacy, diversity and the role of reflection in creating knowledge

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Vibjerg Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Educational Environment ◽  
Pedagogical Tools ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
Creative Processes ◽  
Diversity In Higher Education ◽  
Literacy Standards

Diversity in higher education calls for process oriented information literacy (IL) practitioners rather than source oriented practitioners. They must be generalists because e.g. students with different backgrounds to a higher degree bring multi- and interdisciplinarity into the situation of creating knowledge and problem solving. It is a situation where counselling is about how to prioritise and combine the multidisciplinarity rather than knowing a subject in depth. The purposes of this workshop are: To facilitate answers to the challenges IL practitioners meet in their work in an educational environment characterized by diversity To go through a process from pedagogical reflection to practical ideas about teaching or counselling. The participants will be challenged on their pedagogical awareness, competencies and creativity and on their understanding of information literacy. The participants will not be given the answers, but in order to live up to the concept of a workshop, we must all work and participate in the exploration for answers. The workshop will be a mix of understandings of IL, investigations of diversity and creating knowledge, pedagogical tools, examples of teaching materials, theoretical concepts and creative processes. We will deal with the following questions: How does IL fit into the process of creating knowledge? How should we look at information literacy? As a defined set of skills, qualifications and competencies or as a readiness to handle certain intellectual or academic situations? Does diversity mean the end of information literacy standards?

scholarly journals CREATE: Adapting the Framework to Studio Art disciplines

2017 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Meeks ◽  
Larissa Garcia ◽  
Ashley Peterson ◽  
Alyssa Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Studio Art ◽  
Library Instruction ◽  
Artistic Practice ◽  
Knowledge Practices ◽  
Subject Specialist

Because of its emphasis on knowledge practices and dispositions over prescriptive skills, the ACRL “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education” resonates with subject specialist librarians who may have found it difficult to apply the ACRL “Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education” to their particular programs. For example, the research and corresponding library instruction that supports Studio Art coursework and artistic practice often looks very different from the methods used to conduct scholarship in other disciplines.

scholarly journals Book Review: The Fun of Motivation: Crossing the Threshold Concepts

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Magen Bednar
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Library Instruction ◽  
Threshold Concepts ◽  
Information Research ◽  
New Curricula ◽  
New Framework ◽  
Student Instructor

When ACRL officially adopted the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education in 2016, fun was not a word many librarians would associate with this new Framework, as it required new ways of incorporating information literacy concepts and skills into library instruction sessions. Instead of strict standards, the Framework interconnects ideas and concepts about information, research, and scholarship that will allow the student, instructor, and librarian greater flexibility in developing new curricula.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Evidence-Based Practice and the ACRL Information Literacy Standards: Implications for Information Literacy Practice

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Literacy Practice ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Literacy Standards

Evidence-based practice (EBP), like information literacy, is concerned with an individual’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes relating to using information. EBP is now a professional competency in fields as diverse as social work, nursing and allied health fields, and public policy. A comparison of the Association of College and Research Libraries’ Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education with the commonly accepted EBP model shows congruence, but the two models diverge in their use of authority of the producer as a marker of information quality and in their relative emphasis on formulation of the research question and application of information.

scholarly journals Loaded questions: The Framework for Information Literacy through a DEI lens

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
Karin Heffernan
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Strategic Plan ◽  
Threshold Concepts ◽  
Knowledge Practices ◽  
Diverse Individual

Just after our university published its Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Strategic Plan, I found myself driving home from the “Engaging with the ACRL Framework” Roadshow. My head was full of converting knowledge practices into learning outcomes when the frames began to emerge through a DEI lens, and threshold concepts became questions. The very asking of a question inherently invites diverse, individual perspectives. Published before current higher education DEI efforts, the Framework prompts us to ask questions and pursue answers, especially from unheard or systemically silenced voices. It encourages us to challenge elitism, racism, sexism, ableism, and biases within the entire information ecosystem.

scholarly journals Applying the Framework as a reflective tool: A teacher learner perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 416
Author(s):  
Ethan Pullman
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Threshold Concepts ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Knowledge Practices ◽  
Learner Perspective ◽  
Troublesome Knowledge

If you teach information literacy (IL) according to the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,1 then you have been introduced to terms like knowledge practices, dispositions, and troublesome knowledge. You may have also read several articles debating the Framework (for a quick overview, read Lane Wilkinson’s “The Problem with Threshold Concepts”).2 Regardless of where teaching librarians stand on the Framework, the discourse surrounding it doesn’t adequately address its potential as a reflective tool (as opposed to addressing student learning alone). This is ironic when considering that, at its core, the Framework’s foundation is based in “critical self-reflection, as crucial to becoming more self-directed in [a] rapidly changing ecosystem.”3

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document