scholarly journals Dissemination and Implementation Science for Public Health Professionals: An Overview and Call to Action

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Estabrooks ◽  
Ross C. Brownson ◽  
Nicolaas P. Pronk
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 155798832110505
Author(s):  
Tyler Barnhart ◽  
Michael J. Rovito ◽  
Michael Maresca ◽  
Kathy Rovito

This paper is a direct response to Smith et al.’s (2020) call for more insight into health equity concerns pertaining to COVID-19 outcomes. The goal of this discussion is to offer the field with an evidence-informed ‘avatar’ representing the most-impacted group as it pertains to COVID-19 mortality and morbidity. Policy and practice implications are offered as a call to action for public health professionals to support these most impacted and highest risk communities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Drahota ◽  
Heatherlun Uphold ◽  
Maji Hailemariam ◽  
Tatiana E. Bustos ◽  
Luther Evans ◽  
...  

UNSTRUCTURED Background Focused dissemination and implementation (D&I) of research results is a key strategy for improving public health. While federally-funded research centers are required to have a dissemination core, these efforts are typically directed toward academics (e.g., manuscripts, academic presentations) with limited focus on broader dissemination efforts to community stakeholders, evaluation of D&I processes, or the public health impact associated with the D&I efforts. An opportunity exists to combine the dissemination core requirement in center grants with specific dissemination and implementation research aims. This study protocol describes aims of the “Dissemination and Implementation Science Core” (DISC), developed as part of the NIMHD-funded Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions (FCHES). The FCHES is a Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center focused on reducing health disparities and chronic disease prevention in Region 5 of the United States. The DISC intends to develop D&I strategies for the FCHES research projects, conduct research on the effectiveness of D&I practices, and produce generalizable knowledge about strategies facilitating the translation of research outcomes into community-based settings. Methods/Design The DISC consists of both applied dissemination aims as well as D&I research aims, including: (1) Reduce research-to-practice gap in health promotion trials in Flint, Michigan and Region 5; (2) Disseminate FCHES research activities to local and regional stakeholders; (3) Increase community capacity to utilize dissemination, implementation and sustainment strategies in underserved minority-majority communities; (4) Increase community capacity to affect health equity policy change; and (5) Evaluate contextual factors affecting public health effort sustainment. The proximal intended audience of the DISC’s efforts includes the FCHES academic and community partners, and regional stakeholders, such as providers, policymakers, community-based health and advocacy organizations, and consumers. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first center-funded dissemination core that focuses on the conduct of D&I science research, collaboration to embed D&I research methods into the broader center project efforts, and application of these findings in real-world, community-based settings. Moreover, the lessons learned through the DISC may help guide future center dissemination cores. Including D&I science research into center project activities from the outset may facilitate more efficient uptake of research findings and yield greater public health outcomes.


2020 ◽  

Background: The relationship between oral health and general health is gaining interest in geriatric research; however, a lack of studies dealing with this issue from a general perspective makes it somewhat inaccessible to non-clinical public health professionals. Purpose: The purpose of this review is to describe the relationship between oral health and general health of the elderly on the basis of literature review, and to give non-clinical medical professionals and public health professionals an overview of this discipline. Methods: This study was based on an in-depth review of the literature pertaining to the relationship between oral health and general health among the older people. The tools commonly used to evaluate dental health and the academic researches of male elderly people were also reviewed. And future research directions were summarized. Results: Dental caries, periodontal disease, edentulism, and xerostomia are common oral diseases among the older people. Dental caries and periodontal diseases are the leading causes of missing teeth and edentulism. Xerostomia, similar to dry mouth, is another common oral health disease in the older people. No clear correlation exists between the subjective feeling of dryness and an objective decrease of saliva. Rather, both conditions can be explained by changes in saliva. The General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) are the main assessment tools used to examine oral health and quality of life in the older people. The GOHAI tends to be more sensitive to objective values pertaining to oral function. In addition, oral health studies in male elderly people are population-based cohort or cross-sectional studies, involving masticatory function, oral prevention, frailty problems, cardiovascular disease risk, and cognitive status. Conclusion: It is possible to reduce the incidence of certain oral diseases, even among individuals who take oral health care seriously. Oral health care should be based on the viewpoint of comprehensive treatment, including adequate nutrition, good life and psychology, and correct oral health care methods. In the future, researchers could combine the results of meta-analysis with the clinical experience of doctors to provide a more in-depth and broader discussion on oral health research topics concerning the older people.


Author(s):  
Ana A. Baumann ◽  
Leopoldo J. Cabassa ◽  
Shannon Wiltsey Stirman

This chapter focuses on adaptations in the context of dissemination and implementation research and practice. Consistent with the existing literature, the authors recommend that adaptations be proactively and iteratively determined, strongly informed by a variety of stakeholders, and that efforts be made to carefully describe and document the nature of the adaptations and evaluate their impact on desired service, health, and implementation outcomes. While this chapter focuses on adaptations to interventions and the context of practice, the authors also note that adaptations may need to be made to implementation strategies. Following the call by Proctor and colleagues for further precision in defining and operationalizing implementation strategies, and based on evidence that scholars are not necessarily reporting what and how they are adapting the interventions, scholars are urged to define and evaluate the adaptations they are making not only to the interventions and context of practice but also to the implementation strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document