By Way of Introduction

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 286-287
Author(s):  
Anne Bartel ◽  
Linda Gojak

The goal of those who support NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) is to develop the mathematical power of all students. To achieve this goal, teachers in all mathematics classrooms will need materials and professional support to maintain their commitment to the task and their proficiency in accomplishing it. “Teachers are key figure in changing the ways in which mathematics is taught and learned in schools. Such changes require that teachers have long-term support and adequate resources” (NCTM 1991, 2). This focus issue contains a variety of ideas to support classroom teachers as they begin the difficult job of planning for instruction in mathematics that will help all students achieve mathematical power.

1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-198
Author(s):  
M. Kathleen Heid

The NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Stan dards) (1989) designates four standards that apply to all students at all grade levels: mathematics as problem solving, mathematics as communication, mathematics as reasoning, and mathematical connections. These and NCTM's other standards are embedded in a vision of technologically rich school mathematics classrooms in which students and teachers have constant access to appropriate computing devices and in which students use computers and calculators as tools for the investigation and exploration of problems.


1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 694-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian R. Hirsch ◽  
Arthur F. Coxford ◽  
James T. Fey ◽  
Harold L. Schoen

Current policy reports addressing mathematics education in American schools, such as Everybody Counts (NRC 1989), Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989), Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991), and Assessment Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1995), call for sweeping reform in curricular, instructional, and assessment practices. Implementing the proposed reforms poses new opportunities and challenges for school districts, mathematics departments, and classroom teachers.


1990 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Jon L. Higgins

When NCTM released its Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics in March 1989, I looked for the reaction of the press to this very important document. In almost every newspaper the headline or the Sthru t of the article related to the Standards was that NCTM now recommended that calculator be used in mathematics classrooms. How discouraging! NCTM members know that in March 1989 that recommendation was very old news. Even worse was the fact that the more substantial recommendations of the Standards were generally ignored.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan L. Franke ◽  
Noreen M. Webb ◽  
Angela Chan ◽  
Dan Battey ◽  
Marsha Ing ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-182
Author(s):  
Dalene M. Swanson ◽  
Hong-Lin Yu ◽  
Stella Mouroutsou

Mathematics education has been notoriously slow at interpreting inclusion in ways that are not divisive. Dominant views of educational inclusion in school mathematics classrooms have been shaped by social constructions of ability. These particularly indelible constructions derive from the perceived hierarchical nature of mathematics and the naturalised assumption that mathematisation is purely an intellectual exercise. Constructions of ability, therefore, emanate from the epistemic structures of mathematics education as predominantly practiced worldwide, and the prevalence of proceduralism and exclusion in those practices. Assumptions about ‘ability’ have become a truth to mathematical aptitude held by mathematics teachers in schools. This includes schools across Scotland. In Scotland, the government owes the ‘included pupil’ a legal obligation to provide additional support for learning under section 1(1) of the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004. However, classroom practices deployed around socially-constructed notions of ability have seen schools moving away from an emphasis on ‘additional’ to an expansive interpretation of ‘different from’ in the language of section 1(3)(a) of the Act 2004. This shift, therefore, reinstalls exclusionary effects to school mathematics practices by creating the conditions for some pupils, constructed in terms of disabilities or low ability, to be afforded a more inferior education than others. While philosophical conversations around whether these practices are ethical, egalitarian or democratic might ensue, there is also the human rights angle, which asks whether such practices are even lawful.


2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-456
Author(s):  
Lorna Headrick ◽  
Adi Wiezel ◽  
Gabriel Tarr ◽  
Xiaoxue Zhang ◽  
Catherine E. Cullicott ◽  
...  

Pythagoras ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Valero ◽  
Gloria García ◽  
Francisco Camelo ◽  
Gabriel Mancera ◽  
Julio Romero

On the grounds of our work as researchers, teacher educators and teachers engaging with a socio-political approach in mathematics education in Colombia, we propose to understand democracy in terms of the possibility of constructing a social subjectivity for the dignity of being. We address the dilemma of how the historical insertion of school mathematics in relation to the Colonial project of assimilation of Latin American indigenous peoples into the episteme of the Enlightenment and Modernity is in conflict with the possibility of the promotion of a social subjectivity in mathematics classrooms. We illustrate a pedagogical possibility to move towards a mathematics education for social subjectivity with our work in reassembling the notion of geometrical space in the Colombian secondary school mathematics curriculum with notions of space from critical geography and the problem of territorialisation, and Latin American epistemology with the notion of intimate space as an important element of social subjectivity.


1997 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon L. Senk ◽  
Charlene E. Beckmann ◽  
Denisse R. Thompson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document