Health of gingiva in patients post dental implant therapy-A Cross sectional study

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1333
Author(s):  
Mohamad Qulam Zaki Bin Mohamad Rasidi
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Tommaso Weinstein ◽  
Tommaso Clauser ◽  
Massimo Del Fabbro ◽  
Matteo Deflorian ◽  
Andrea Parenti ◽  
...  

The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of peri-implantitis and to assess its association with several patient- and implant-related factors. Patients with at least one implant, who came for a recall visit to one of the four centers over a period of five months, were enrolled. Presence of peri-implantitis (defined as bleeding on probing, exudate/suppuration, bone loss > 0.2 mm/year and increased pocket depth) and several other variables (e.g., smoking habits, history of periodontitis, diabetes) were recorded. Out of 248 enrolled patients (1162 implants), 10 patients had at least one implant with peri-implantitis (4.03%); a total of 14 implants were affected (1.20%). A statistically significant association between peri-implantitis and diabetes was found (OR 8.65; CI: 1.94–38.57). Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day (OR: 0.53; CI 0.03–9.45) and history of periodontitis (OR: 2.42; CI: 0.49–11.89) were not found to be statistically associated with peri-implantitis. Even if implant therapy is a consolidated treatment, biological complications do happen. Strict supportive therapy recalls could lead to lower rates of peri-implantitis and earlier diagnosis.


Author(s):  
Jordi Gargallo‐Albiol ◽  
Lorenzo Tavelli ◽  
Shayan Barootchi ◽  
Alberto Monje ◽  
Hom‐Lay Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL4) ◽  
pp. 881-887
Author(s):  
Ankita Komal Labh ◽  
Marian Anand Bennis ◽  
Geo Mani

The term peri-implantitis describes an inflammatory disease that results in the loss of supporting bone around an implant. It differs from mucositis in which the inflammation of mucosa surrounding an implant is not accompanied by bone loss and is reversible. Peri-implant diseases are not uncommon following implant therapy. This study aims to find the incidence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis among patients having undergone implant therapy in Dental University Hospital in Chennai, India. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 305 samples from the Department of Implantology after reviewing and analysing the data of 86000 patients between June 2019 and March 2020. Microsoft Excel® was used to tabulate the data obtained. The variables assessed were age, gender, presence of infection, type of inflammation and site of implant placement. The sample had a gender distribution of 60.33% males and 39.67% females. 41% implant patients belonged to the age group of 36-55 years. The most (27.5%) common site of implant placement was sextant 4 specifically in relation to the first molar. 98.69% of implant sites showed no signs of infection. 0.66% of implants (in one subject) showed peri-implantitis. 0.33% showed peri-implant mucositis and for 0.33% implants the data was insufficient for categorization. Within the limits of the study, the incidence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis was 1.31% among implant patients of a Dental University Hospital in Chennai, India.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-162
Author(s):  
Floriane Dulin ◽  
Jean-Marie Marteau ◽  
Jean-Christophe Fricain ◽  
Mathilde Fénelon

Background: In 2016, 459 dentists were registered in French West Indies and French Guyana. They represent 10% of French clinicians but they work in an environment very different from continental France. The aim of this study was to describe dental implantology practices among dentists in Guadeloupe, Martinique, and French Guyana. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study, with questionnaires sent by email, was conducted from November 2016 to January 2017. Results: 116 practitioners answered. Respondents were all general practitioners, except two dentists who practiced only surgical procedures (not specialists). Implant surgeries were provided by 50% respondents and soft-tissue or hard-tissue grafting were provided by 34.5% of the sample. Prosthodontic procedures were carried out by 62.9% respondents. At last, 34.5% of the sample were not involved in implant services. Discussion: The proportion of dentists who performed implant procedures was similar to that reported in other international studies and French survey. The percentage of dentists not involved in implant dentistry still significant and the most frequently reported barriers were the expense of treatment, patient's difficulties to afford the treatment and the lack of knowledge. Conclusion: The practice of implant dentistry is widespread in French West Indies and French Guyana. Dental implant use was not different between clinicians of Guadeloupe, Martinique, and French Guyana. The number of dentists who received local implant training was lower in French Guyana.


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Hilal Öztürk ◽  
Hatice Özgedik ◽  
Hakan Avsever ◽  
Mehmet Kurt ◽  
Bugra Şenel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document