scholarly journals Defining and redefining its role in biology: Synthetic biology as an emerging field at the interface of engineering and biology

Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Synthetic biology is often misunderstood as creation of artificial life or new biology using principles different from those of extant organisms around us. But, fundamentally, the field is about engineering biology in a more efficient and effective way, and endowing new functions in existing organisms using a more refined and predictable approach. Thus, synthetic biology as encapsulated by the field it helps defined, is enhanced recombinant DNA technology, an example of which is modular and orthogonal “standard swappable biological parts”. But, as the field grows and matures, various “allied” fields are subsumed into it such as metabolic engineering, protein engineering, directed evolution, origins of life research, and systems biology, which in totality represents a new perspective of how engineering principles can be utilized to expand, in scope and depth, the realms of questions that biology ask. Two parallel approaches, directed evolution and de novo protein design, are frequently used to engineer new phenotypes into organisms. Similar to evolution but with purposeful use of selection pressure to elicit progressive refinement of specific traits in an efficient manner, directed evolution is a powerful methodology that generates, at the cell level, libraries of mutants of slightly different function such as differing resistance to heavy metals, that upon exertion of continued selection pressure, led to the evolution of a strain capable of thriving under a hostile environment previously inhabitable to the organism. Taking a different approach, de novo protein design taps on advances in biomolecule structure modeling together with bioinformatic sequence search for inserting, in a structure defined manner, specific amino acids (natural or unnatural) in a protein structure to endow desired functionality, where one highly sought function is catalysis of unnatural reactions such as the Diels-Alder reaction. Long chain length DNA synthesis, on the other hand, finds utility in enabling the synthesis of a minimal genome for a bacterium, which demonstrates the huge possibilities of having a microbe with an optimized genome (free of extraneous genes) for biotechnological applications in delivering drugs and fuel at high titer with lower cost. Having assimilated other fields, synthetic biology is again redefining its role as its seeks to use, in an ethical and responsible manner, a new way of adding new functions into organisms through genome editing. For example, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing holds enormous potential for providing life saving gene editing capability in medical treatments, while enabling fast, easy removal of undesirable genes and prophages from a production microorganism. Synthetic biologists are asking themselves deep questions on how best to regulate this powerful technology that could be as impactful on science and human society as recombinant DNA technology was in 1973.

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Synthetic biology is often misunderstood as creation of artificial life or new biology using principles different from those of extant organisms around us. But, fundamentally, the field is about engineering biology in a more efficient and effective way, and endowing new functions in existing organisms using a more refined and predictable approach. Thus, synthetic biology as encapsulated by the field it helps defined, is enhanced recombinant DNA technology, an example of which is modular and orthogonal “standard swappable biological parts”. But, as the field grows and matures, various “allied” fields are subsumed into it such as metabolic engineering, protein engineering, directed evolution, origins of life research, and systems biology, which in totality represents a new perspective of how engineering principles can be utilized to expand, in scope and depth, the realms of questions that biology ask. Two parallel approaches, directed evolution and de novo protein design, are frequently used to engineer new phenotypes into organisms. Similar to evolution but with purposeful use of selection pressure to elicit progressive refinement of specific traits in an efficient manner, directed evolution is a powerful methodology that generates, at the cell level, libraries of mutants of slightly different function such as differing resistance to heavy metals, that upon exertion of continued selection pressure, led to the evolution of a strain capable of thriving under a hostile environment previously inhabitable to the organism. Taking a different approach, de novo protein design taps on advances in biomolecule structure modeling together with bioinformatic sequence search for inserting, in a structure defined manner, specific amino acids (natural or unnatural) in a protein structure to endow desired functionality, where one highly sought function is catalysis of unnatural reactions such as the Diels-Alder reaction. Long chain length DNA synthesis, on the other hand, finds utility in enabling the synthesis of a minimal genome for a bacterium, which demonstrates the huge possibilities of having a microbe with an optimized genome (free of extraneous genes) for biotechnological applications in delivering drugs and fuel at high titer with lower cost. Having assimilated other fields, synthetic biology is again redefining its role as its seeks to use, in an ethical and responsible manner, a new way of adding new functions into organisms through genome editing. For example, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing holds enormous potential for providing life saving gene editing capability in medical treatments, while enabling fast, easy removal of undesirable genes and prophages from a production microorganism. Synthetic biologists are asking themselves deep questions on how best to regulate this powerful technology that could be as impactful on science and human society as recombinant DNA technology was in 1973.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1038-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Frow

Synthetic biology represents a recent and explicit attempt to make biology easier to engineer, and through this to open up the design space of genetic engineering to a wider range of practitioners (including, but not limited to, engineers). Proponents of this approach emphasize the standardization of practices as key to successful biological engineering; yet, meaningful transatlantic differences are emerging with respect to the constitution of key concerns and the governance of synthetic biology in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK). In this article, I tease out how national approaches to governing synthetic biology are being framed against different salient past experiences with recombinant DNA technology. In the US, the governance of synthetic biology is consistently articulated in relation to the early days of recombinant DNA technology and the self-governance mechanisms pioneered in response to Asilomar. In the UK, more recent experiences with genetically modified crops provide the overarching imaginary against which governance initiatives are being proposed. I suggest that these differing sociotechnical imaginaries have implications for how new “groups of concern” are being defined in relation to synthetic biology and how measures to contain perceived risks are being pursued in the US and Britain.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sourabh Sulabh ◽  
Amit Kumar

The progress in Recombinant DNA technology guided the way for production of transgenic plants and animals. The production of Bt cotton and Bt brinjal was one of them. Transgenic cows capable of producing human proinsulin and human lactoferrin in milk have been successfully engineered. Though the efficacy of the techniques used or such transgenic organism is questionable, with the creation of new and better technology like the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein system, the chances and effectiveness for success of gene incorporation during development of a transgenic animal has increased. In near future such transgenics are going to play an important role in support and sustenance of human society. This review deals with the application of transgenesis for enhancing productivity and promoting better health in animals and humans alike.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-57
Author(s):  
Eva Šlesingerová

Recombinant DNA technology is an essential area of life engineering. The main aim of research in this field is to experimentally explore the possibilities of repairing damaged human DNA, healing or enhancing future human bodies. Based on ethnographic research in a Czech biochemical laboratory, the article explores biotechnological corporealities and their specific ontology through dealings with bio-objects, the bodywork of scientists. Using the complementary concepts of utopia and heterotopia, the text addresses the situation of bodies and bio-objects in a laboratory. Embodied utopias are analyzed as material semiotic phenomena that are embodied by scientists in their visions and emotions and that are related to potential bodies and to future, not-yet-actualized embodiments. As a counterpart to this, the text explores embodied heterotopias, which are always the other spaces, like biotechnological bio-objects that are simulated in computers or stored in special solutions.


1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (Special) ◽  
pp. 263-266
Author(s):  
O. IFUKU ◽  
S. HAZE ◽  
J. KISHIMOTO ◽  
M. YANAGI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document