scholarly journals H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase MLL4 is required for enhancer activation during cell differentiation

eLife ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Eun Lee ◽  
Chaochen Wang ◽  
Shiliyang Xu ◽  
Young-Wook Cho ◽  
Lifeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Functional Redundancy ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Differentiation Stage

Enhancers play a central role in cell-type-specific gene expression and are marked by H3K4me1/2. Active enhancers are further marked by H3K27ac. However, the methyltransferases responsible for H3K4me1/2 on enhancers remain elusive. Furthermore, how these enzymes function on enhancers to regulate cell-type-specific gene expression is unclear. In this study, we identify MLL4 (KMT2D) as a major mammalian H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase with partial functional redundancy with MLL3 (KMT2C). Using adipogenesis and myogenesis as model systems, we show that MLL4 exhibits cell-type- and differentiation-stage-specific genomic binding and is predominantly localized on enhancers. MLL4 co-localizes with lineage-determining transcription factors (TFs) on active enhancers during differentiation. Deletion of Mll4 markedly decreases H3K4me1/2, H3K27ac, Mediator and Polymerase II levels on enhancers and leads to severe defects in cell-type-specific gene expression and cell differentiation. Together, these findings identify MLL4 as a major mammalian H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase essential for enhancer activation during cell differentiation.

scholarly journals Structural Changes in Transcriptional Regulatory Networks for Cell-type-specific Gene Expression During Hematopoiesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Hematopoiesis is an extensively studied model system for cell differentiation. Cell-type-specific gene expression patterns are observed during hematopoiesis. Gene expression is governed by regulatory networks composed of cell-type-specific transcription factors. Resolving the transcriptional regulatory network for cell-type-specific gene expression provides a promising means of understanding the mechanisms underlying cell fate decisions. In this study, transcriptional regulatory networks in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells were predicted based on gene expression profiles and distributions of transcription factor binding motifs in the promoter regions of cell-type-specific transcription factors. In particular, structural changes that occur when pluripotent stem cells progress to lineage-committed progenitors were evaluated. Marked changes in the regulatory circuit of transcription throughout the differentiation process could be elucidated by network analysis. Modular structures were a frequently described feature of biological networks observed in estimated networks. Within a module, most transcription factors were found to be regulated by a small number of regulators acting as downstream targets. Certain regulators within these modules coincide with known key regulators of hematopoietic cell differentiation. In addition to the modular structure, a twolayered structure was clearly observed in progenitor regulatory networks. Transcription factors could be distinctly divided into regulators within the regulatory layer and into targets in the output layer according to their degree of distribution. The restriction of mutual regulation between transcription factors was remarkable in that it allowed for alterations in network structures between hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors. Thus, using this approach, the relationships among transcription factors could be revealed by a reduction in mutual regulation to form a modular structure within the regulatory network

scholarly journals Srf destabilizes cellular identity by suppressing cell-type-specific gene expression programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Ikeda ◽  
Takafusa Hikichi ◽  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Hirofumi Shibata ◽  
Kanae Mitsunaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Cellular Identity

scholarly journals Distinct CoREST complexes act in a cell-type-specific manner

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Mačinković ◽  
Ina Theofel ◽  
Tim Hundertmark ◽  
Kristina Kovač ◽  
Stephan Awe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
S2 Cells ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract CoREST has been identified as a subunit of several protein complexes that generate transcriptionally repressive chromatin structures during development. However, a comprehensive analysis of the CoREST interactome has not been carried out. We use proteomic approaches to define the interactomes of two dCoREST isoforms, dCoREST-L and dCoREST-M, in Drosophila. We identify three distinct histone deacetylase complexes built around a common dCoREST/dRPD3 core: A dLSD1/dCoREST complex, the LINT complex and a dG9a/dCoREST complex. The latter two complexes can incorporate both dCoREST isoforms. By contrast, the dLSD1/dCoREST complex exclusively assembles with the dCoREST-L isoform. Genome-wide studies show that the three dCoREST complexes associate with chromatin predominantly at promoters. Transcriptome analyses in S2 cells and testes reveal that different cell lineages utilize distinct dCoREST complexes to maintain cell-type-specific gene expression programmes: In macrophage-like S2 cells, LINT represses germ line-related genes whereas other dCoREST complexes are largely dispensable. By contrast, in testes, the dLSD1/dCoREST complex prevents transcription of germ line-inappropriate genes and is essential for spermatogenesis and fertility, whereas depletion of other dCoREST complexes has no effect. Our study uncovers three distinct dCoREST complexes that function in a lineage-restricted fashion to repress specific sets of genes thereby maintaining cell-type-specific gene expression programmes.

scholarly journals Dynamic changes in cis-regulatory occupancy by Six1 and its cooperative interactions with distinct cofactors drive lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 2880-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Aarthi Ramakrishnan ◽  
Bernd Fritzsch ◽  
Jinshu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Sensory Epithelium ◽  
Hair Bundle ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene

Abstract The transcription factor Six1 is essential for induction of sensory cell fate and formation of auditory sensory epithelium, but how it activates gene expression programs to generate distinct cell-types remains unknown. Here, we perform genome-wide characterization of Six1 binding at different stages of auditory sensory epithelium development and find that Six1-binding to cis-regulatory elements changes dramatically at cell-state transitions. Intriguingly, Six1 pre-occupies enhancers of cell-type-specific regulators and effectors before their expression. We demonstrate in-vivo cell-type-specific activity of Six1-bound novel enhancers of Pbx1, Fgf8, Dusp6, Vangl2, the hair-cell master regulator Atoh1 and a cascade of Atoh1’s downstream factors, including Pou4f3 and Gfi1. A subset of Six1-bound sites carry consensus-sequences for its downstream factors, including Atoh1, Gfi1, Pou4f3, Gata3 and Pbx1, all of which physically interact with Six1. Motif analysis identifies RFX/X-box as one of the most significantly enriched motifs in Six1-bound sites, and we demonstrate that Six1-RFX proteins cooperatively regulate gene expression through binding to SIX:RFX-motifs. Six1 targets a wide range of hair-bundle regulators and late Six1 deletion disrupts hair-bundle polarity. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how Six1 cooperates with distinct cofactors in feedforward loops to control lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document