scholarly journals Quantitative analysis of mammalian GIRK2 channel regulation by G proteins, the signaling lipid PIP2 and Na+ in a reconstituted system

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Wang ◽  
Matthew R Whorton ◽  
Roderick MacKinnon
Keyword(s):  
G Proteins ◽  
Lipid Membranes ◽  
Hill Coefficient ◽  
Pacemaker Cells ◽  
Girk Channels ◽  
Channel Regulation ◽  
Reconstituted System ◽  
Planar Lipid Membranes ◽  
Natural Variations ◽  
Multiple Signaling

GIRK channels control spike frequency in atrial pacemaker cells and inhibitory potentials in neurons. By directly responding to G proteins, PIP2 and Na+, GIRK is under the control of multiple signaling pathways. In this study, the mammalian GIRK2 channel has been purified and reconstituted in planar lipid membranes and effects of Gα, Gβγ, PIP2 and Na+ analyzed. Gβγ and PIP2 must be present simultaneously to activate GIRK2. Na+ is not essential but modulates the effect of Gβγ and PIP2 over physiological concentrations. Gαi1(GTPγS) has no effect, whereas Gαi1(GDP) closes the channel through removal of Gβγ. In the presence of Gβγ, GIRK2 opens as a function of PIP2 mole fraction with Hill coefficient 2.5 and an affinity that poises GIRK2 to respond to natural variations of PIP2 concentration. The dual requirement for Gβγ and PIP2 can help to explain why GIRK2 is activated by Gi/o, but not Gq coupled GPCRs.

scholarly journals Every Detail Matters. That Is, How the Interaction between Gα Proteins and Membrane Affects Their Function

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Polit ◽  
Paweł Mystek ◽  
Ewa Błasiak
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Lipid Membranes ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Membrane Attachment ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Multicellular Organisms ◽  
G Protein Coupled

In highly organized multicellular organisms such as humans, the functions of an individual cell are dependent on signal transduction through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and subsequently heterotrimeric G proteins. As most of the elements belonging to the signal transduction system are bound to lipid membranes, researchers are showing increasing interest in studying the accompanying protein–lipid interactions, which have been demonstrated to not only provide the environment but also regulate proper and efficient signal transduction. The mode of interaction between the cell membrane and G proteins is well known. Despite this, the recognition mechanisms at the molecular level and how the individual G protein-membrane attachment signals are interrelated in the process of the complex control of membrane targeting of G proteins remain unelucidated. This review focuses on the mechanisms by which mammalian Gα subunits of G proteins interact with lipids and the factors responsible for the specificity of membrane association. We summarize recent data on how these signaling proteins are precisely targeted to a specific site in the membrane region by introducing well-defined modifications as well as through the presence of polybasic regions within these proteins and interactions with other components of the heterocomplex.

scholarly journals Erratum

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 706-706
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Equilibrium State ◽  
Rat Brain ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Pertussis Toxin ◽  
Adp Ribosylation ◽  
Gtp Binding ◽  
Reconstituted System ◽  
Α Subunits

Ischemia of Rat Brain Decreases Pertussis Toxin-Catalyzed [32P] ADP Ribosylation of GTP-Binding Proteins (Gi1 and G0) in Membranes Katsunobu Takenaka, Yasunori Kanaho, Koh-ichi Nagata, Noboru Sakai, Hiromu Yamada, Yoshinori Nozawa [ Originally published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1991;11:155–160] On page 158 of the above, arrows were erroneously deleted from the equation in the following passage: Heterotrimers of G proteins that bind GDP to α subunits seem to be the preferred substrates for PTcatalyzed ADP ribosylation since guanine nucleotides (GDP and GTP) and 13'Y subunits stimulate ADP ribosylation in the reconstituted system and in membranes (Tsai et aI., 1984). These results indicate that the G proteins may exist at the equilibrium state as shown below: This omission was the result of a typesetting error, which the publisher regrets.

Ion channel regulation by G proteins

1995 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 865-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wickman ◽  
D. E. Clapham
Keyword(s):  
Ion Channels ◽  
Ion Channel ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Second Messengers ◽  
Channel Activity ◽  
Ion Channel Regulation ◽  
Protein Subunits ◽  
Channel Regulation ◽  
Intracellular Cascades

Ion channels are poised uniquely to initiate, mediate, or regulate such distinct cellular activities as action potential propagation, secretion, and gene transcription. In retrospect, it is not surprising that studies of ion channels have revealed considerable diversities in their primary structures, regulation, and expression. From a functional standpoint, the various mechanisms coopted by cells to regulate channel activity are particularly fascinating. Extracellular ligands, membrane potential, phosphorylation, ions themselves, and diffusible second messengers are all well-established regulators of ion channel activity. Heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) mediate many of these types of ion channel regulation by stimulating or inhibiting phosphorylation pathways, initiating intracellular cascades leading to elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ or adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate levels, or by generating various lipid-derived compounds. In some cases, it seems that activated G protein subunits can interact directly with ion channels to elicit regulation. Although there is currently little direct biochemical evidence to support such a mechanism, it is the working hypothesis for the most-studied G protein-regulated ion channels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document