scholarly journals Decision letter: Dynamic regulation of transcription factors by nucleosome remodeling

2015 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Dynamic Regulation ◽  
Nucleosome Remodeling

scholarly journals Dynamic Regulation of Transcription Factors by Nucleosome Remodeling

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 76a ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Li ◽  
Payel Sen ◽  
Lola Olufemi ◽  
Arjan Hada ◽  
Michael A. Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Dynamic Regulation ◽  
Nucleosome Remodeling

scholarly journals Dynamic regulation of transcription factors by nucleosome remodeling

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Li ◽  
Arjan Hada ◽  
Payel Sen ◽  
Lola Olufemi ◽  
Michael A Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Nucleosome Positioning ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Dynamic Regulation ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Nucleosome Remodeling ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Promoter Architecture ◽  
Sequence Elements ◽  
Dna Template

The chromatin landscape and promoter architecture are dominated by the interplay of nucleosome and transcription factor (TF) binding to crucial DNA sequence elements. However, it remains unclear whether nucleosomes mobilized by chromatin remodelers can influence TFs that are already present on the DNA template. In this study, we investigated the interplay between nucleosome remodeling, by either yeast ISW1a or SWI/SNF, and a bound TF. We found that a TF serves as a major barrier to ISW1a remodeling, and acts as a boundary for nucleosome repositioning. In contrast, SWI/SNF was able to slide a nucleosome past a TF, with concurrent eviction of the TF from the DNA, and the TF did not significantly impact the nucleosome positioning. Our results provide direct evidence for a novel mechanism for both nucleosome positioning regulation by bound TFs and TF regulation via dynamic repositioning of nucleosomes.

scholarly journals Novel Transcriptional Mechanisms for Regulating Metabolism by Thyroid Hormone

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 3284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brijesh Kumar Singh ◽  
Rohit Anthony Sinha ◽  
Paul Michael Yen
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Hormone Response Elements ◽  
Conventional View ◽  
Metabolic Genes ◽  
Activation Of Transcription ◽  
Rna Transcript

The thyroid hormone plays a key role in energy and nutrient metabolisms in many tissues and regulates the transcription of key genes in metabolic pathways. It has long been believed that thyroid hormones (THs) exerted their effects primarily by binding to nuclear TH receptors (THRs) that are associated with conserved thyroid hormone response elements (TREs) located on the promoters of target genes. However, recent transcriptome and ChIP-Seq studies have challenged this conventional view as discordance was observed between TH-responsive genes and THR binding to DNA. While THR association with other transcription factors bound to DNA, TH activation of THRs to mediate effects that do not involve DNA-binding, or TH binding to proteins other than THRs have been invoked as potential mechanisms to explain this discrepancy, it appears that additional novel mechanisms may enable TH to regulate the mRNA expression. These include activation of transcription factors by SIRT1 via metabolic actions by TH, the post-translational modification of THR, the THR co-regulation of transcription with other nuclear receptors and transcription factors, and the microRNA (miR) control of RNA transcript expression to encode proteins involved in the cellular metabolism. Together, these novel mechanisms enlarge and diversify the panoply of metabolic genes that can be regulated by TH.

scholarly journals Expression and Regulation of Transcription Factors GATA-4 and GATA-6 in Developing Mouse Testis1

Endocrinology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 1470-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilkka Ketola ◽  
Nafis Rahman ◽  
Jorma Toppari ◽  
Malgorzata Bielinska ◽  
Susan B. Porter-Tinge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription

scholarly journals Transcriptional Regulation of Hydrogen Peroxide and Calcium for Signaling Transduction and Stress-defensive Genes Contributing to Improved Drought Tolerance in Creeping Bentgrass

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-246
Author(s):  
Zhou Li ◽  
Yan Peng ◽  
Bingru Huang
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Drought Tolerance ◽  
Creeping Bentgrass ◽  
Grass Species ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Signaling Transduction ◽  
Genes Expression ◽  
Protective Genes ◽  
Ca Signaling

Small molecules, including H2O2 and Ca, mediate stress signaling and drought tolerance in plants. The objective of this study was to determine whether improvement in drought tolerance by H2O2 and Ca were associated with the regulation of transcription factors and stress-protective genes in perennial grass species. Plants of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) were sprayed with water (control), H2O2 (9 mm), or CaCl2 (10 mm) and exposed to drought stress for 20 days in controlled-environment growth chambers. Foliar application of H2O2 or Ca led to significant improvement in drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass, as demonstrated by greater turf quality, leaf relative water content, chlorophyll content, photochemical efficiency, and cell membrane stability, as compared with the untreated control. The application of H2O2 and Ca resulted in significant up-regulation of genes in Ca signaling transduction pathways [Ca-dependent kinase 26 (CDPK26), mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK1), and 14-3-3] and transcript factors (WRKY75 and MYB13). For genes encoding antioxidant enzymes, H2O2 mainly enhanced superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) expression, while Ca primarily improved transcript levels of SOD, monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), and GR. In addition, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), metallothionein 1 (MT1), and glutamine synthetase 2 (GS2) were also markedly up-regulated by H2O2 and Ca under drought stress. However, the transcript level of lipoxygenase 3 (LOX3) was significantly down-regulated by H2O2 and Ca under well-watered and drought conditions. These results imply that H2O2 and Ca commonly or differentially regulate genes expression in association with drought tolerance through activating Ca signaling pathway and regulating transcription factors and stress-protective genes expression, leading to the alleviation of lipid peroxidation, maintenance of correct protein folding and translocation, and enhancement of nitrogen metabolism under a prolonged period of drought stress in creeping bentgrass.

scholarly journals Posttranscriptional regulation of T helper cell fate decisions

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (8) ◽  
pp. 2615-2631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai P. Hoefig ◽  
Vigo Heissmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
T Helper Cell ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Helper Cell ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
T Helper ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions

T helper cell subsets orchestrate context- and pathogen-specific responses of the immune system. They mostly do so by secreting specific cytokines that attract or induce activation and differentiation of other immune or nonimmune cells. The differentiation of T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, T follicular helper, Th17, and induced regulatory T cell subsets from naive T cells depends on the activation of intracellular signal transduction cascades. These cascades originate from T cell receptor and costimulatory receptor engagement and also receive critical input from cytokine receptors that sample the cytokine milieu within secondary lymphoid organs. Signal transduction then leads to the expression of subset-specifying transcription factors that, in concert with other transcription factors, up-regulate downstream signature genes. Although regulation of transcription is important, recent research has shown that posttranscriptional and posttranslational regulation can critically shape or even determine the outcome of Th cell differentiation. In this review, we describe how specific microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, RNA-binding proteins, and ubiquitin-modifying enzymes regulate their targets to skew cell fate decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document