scholarly journals Distinct spatial coordinate of visual and vestibular heading signals in macaque FEFsem and MSTd

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua Yang ◽  
Yong Gu
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Spatial Coordinate ◽  
Common Reference ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Dorsal Portion ◽  
Heading Estimation

Precise heading estimate requires integration of visual optic flow and vestibular inertial motion originating from distinct spatial coordinates (eye- and head-centered, respectively). To explore whether the two heading signals may share a common reference frame along the hierarchy of cortical stages, we explored two multisensory areas in macaques: the smooth pursuit area of the frontal eye field (FEFsem) closer to the motor side, and the dorsal portion of medial superior temporal area (MSTd) closer to the sensory side. In both areas, vestibular signals are head-centered, whereas visual signals are mainly eye-centered. However, visual signals in FEFsem are more shifted towards the head coordinate compared to MSTd. These results are robust being largely independent on: (1) smooth pursuit eye movement, (2) motion parallax cue, and (3) behavioral context for active heading estimation, indicating that the visual and vestibular heading signals may be represented in distinct spatial coordinate in sensory cortices.

Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex

2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy A. Orban
Keyword(s):  
Visual Processing ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Order Processing ◽  
Neuronal Populations ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Extrastriate Areas ◽  
Putative Mechanism

The extrastriate cortex of primates encompasses a substantial portion of the cerebral cortex and is devoted to the higher order processing of visual signals and their dispatch to other parts of the brain. A first step towards the understanding of the function of this cortical tissue is a description of the selectivities of the various neuronal populations for higher order aspects of the image. These selectivities present in the various extrastriate areas support many diverse representations of the scene before the subject. The list of the known selectivities includes that for pattern direction and speed gradients in middle temporal/V5 area; for heading in medial superior temporal visual area, dorsal part; for orientation of nonluminance contours in V2 and V4; for curved boundary fragments in V4 and shape parts in infero-temporal area (IT); and for curvature and orientation in depth from disparity in IT and CIP. The most common putative mechanism for generating such emergent selectivity is the pattern of excitatory and inhibitory linear inputs from the afferent area combined with nonlinear mechanisms in the afferent and receiving area.

scholarly journals A Theory of the Dual Pathways for Smooth Pursuit Based on Dynamic Gain Control

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 2798-2808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Nuding ◽  
Seiji Ono ◽  
Michael J. Mustari ◽  
Ulrich Büttner ◽  
Stefan Glasauer
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stem ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Gain Control ◽  
Salient Feature ◽  
Target Motion ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Parallel Pathways ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Behavioral Paradigm ◽  
Dynamic Gain

The smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) system is much more sensitive to target motion perturbations during pursuit than during fixation. This sensitivity is commonly attributed to a dynamic gain control mechanism. Neither the neural substrate nor the functional architecture for this gain control has been fully revealed. There are at least two cortical areas that crucially contribute to smooth pursuit and are therefore eligible sites for dynamic gain control: the medial superior temporal area (MST) and the pursuit area of the frontal eye fields (FEFs), which both project to brain stem premotor structures via parallel pathways. The aim of this study was to develop a model of smooth pursuit based on behavioral, anatomical, and neurophysiological results to account for nonlinear dynamic gain control. Using a behavioral paradigm in humans consisting of a sinusoidal oscillation (4 Hz, ±8°/s) superimposed on a constant velocity target motion (0–24°/s), we were able to identify relevant gain control parameters in the model. A salient feature of our model is the emergence of two parallel pathways from higher visual cortical to lower motor areas in the brain stem that correspond to the MST and FEF pathways. Detailed analysis of the model revealed that one pathway mainly carries eye velocity related signals, whereas the other is associated mostly with eye acceleration. From comparison with known neurophysiological results we conclude that the dynamic gain control can be attributed to the FEF pathway, whereas the MST pathway serves as the basic circuit for maintaining an ongoing SPEM.

scholarly journals Area MSTd Neurons Encode Visual Stimuli in Eye Coordinates During Fixation and Pursuit

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Lee ◽  
Bijan Pesaran ◽  
Richard A. Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Visual Image ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Coordinate Frame ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Translation Speed ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Posterior Parietal ◽  
Self Motion

Visual signals generated by self-motion are initially represented in retinal coordinates in the early parts of the visual system. Because this information can be used by an observer to navigate through the environment, it must be transformed into body or world coordinates at later stations of the visual-motor pathway. Neurons in the dorsal aspect of the medial superior temporal area (MSTd) are tuned to the focus of expansion (FOE) of the visual image. We performed experiments to determine whether focus tuning curves in area MSTd are represented in eye coordinates or in screen coordinates (which could be head, body, or world-centered in the head-fixed paradigm used). Because MSTd neurons adjust their FOE tuning curves during pursuit eye movements to compensate for changes in pursuit and translation speed that distort the visual image, the coordinate frame was determined while the eyes were stationary (fixed gaze or simulated pursuit conditions) and while the eyes were moving (real pursuit condition). We recorded extracellular responses from 80 MSTd neurons in two rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta). We found that the FOE tuning curves of the overwhelming majority of neurons were aligned in an eye-centered coordinate frame in each of the experimental conditions [fixed gaze: 77/80 (96%); real pursuit: 77/80 (96%); simulated pursuit 74/80 (93%); t-test, P < 0.05]. These results indicate that MSTd neurons represent heading in an eye-centered coordinate frame both when the eyes are stationary and when they are moving. We also found that area MSTd demonstrates significant eye position gain modulation of response fields much like its posterior parietal neighbors.

scholarly journals Neuronal activity in medial superior temporal area (MST) during memory-based smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys

2011 ◽  
Vol 214 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei Kurkin ◽  
Teppei Akao ◽  
Natsuko Shichinohe ◽  
Junko Fukushima ◽  
Kikuro Fukushima
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Properties of Vestibular Responses in Area MSTd

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 1506-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Fetsch ◽  
Suhrud M. Rajguru ◽  
Anuk Karunaratne ◽  
Yong Gu ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Structure ◽  
Frequency Domain Analysis ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Motion Cues ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Spatial Tuning ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Self Motion

Recent studies have shown that many neurons in the primate dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd) show spatial tuning during inertial motion and that these responses are vestibular in origin. Given their well-studied role in processing visual self-motion cues (i.e., optic flow), these neurons may be involved in the integration of visual and vestibular signals to facilitate robust perception of self-motion. However, the temporal structure of vestibular responses in MSTd has not been characterized in detail. Specifically, it is not known whether MSTd neurons encode velocity, acceleration, or some combination of motion parameters not explicitly encoded by vestibular afferents. In this study, we have applied a frequency-domain analysis to single-unit responses during translation in three dimensions (3D). The analysis quantifies the stimulus-driven temporal modulation of each response as well as the degree to which this modulation reflects the velocity and/or acceleration profile of the stimulus. We show that MSTd neurons signal a combination of velocity and acceleration components with the velocity component being stronger for most neurons. These two components can exist both within and across motion directions, although their spatial tuning did not show a systematic relationship across the population. From these results, vestibular responses in MSTd appear to show characteristic features of spatiotemporal convergence, similar to previous findings in the brain stem and thalamus. The predominance of velocity encoding in this region may reflect the suitability of these signals to be integrated with visual signals regarding self-motion perception.

scholarly journals The Response of MSTd Neurons to Perturbations in Target Motion During Ongoing Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 519-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Ono ◽  
Lukas Brostek ◽  
Ulrich Nuding ◽  
Stefan Glasauer ◽  
Ulrich Büttner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Gain Control ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Cortical Areas ◽  
Target Perturbation ◽  
Behaving Monkeys ◽  
Dynamic Gain

Several regions of the brain are involved in smooth-pursuit eye movement (SPEM) control, including the cortical areas MST (medial superior temporal) and FEF (frontal eye field). It has been shown that the eye-movement responses to a brief perturbation of the visual target during ongoing pursuit increases with higher pursuit velocities. To further investigate the underlying neuronal mechanism of this nonlinear dynamic gain control and the contributions of different cortical areas to it, we recorded from MSTd (dorsal division of the MST area) neurons in behaving monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) during step-ramp SPEM (5–20°/s) with and without superimposed target perturbation (one cycle, 5 Hz, ±10°/s). Smooth-pursuit–related MSTd neurons started to increase their activity on average 127 ms after eye-movement onset. Target perturbation consistently led to larger eye-movement responses and decreasing latencies with increasing ramp velocities, as predicted by dynamic gain control. For 36% of the smooth-pursuit–related MSTd neurons the eye-movement perturbation was accompanied by detectable changes in neuronal activity with a latency of 102 ms, with respect to the eye-movement response. The remaining smooth-pursuit–related MSTd neurons (64%) did not reflect the eye-movement perturbation. For the large majority of cases this finding could be predicted by the dynamic properties of the step-ramp responses. Almost all these MSTd neurons had large visual receptive fields responding to motion in preferred directions opposite to the optimal SPEM stimulus. Based on these findings it is unlikely that MSTd plays a major role for dynamic gain control and initiation of the perturbation response. However, neurons in MSTd could still participate in SPEM maintenance. Due to their visual field properties they could also play a role in other functions such as self-motion perception.

Smooth-Pursuit Eye-Movement Deficits With Chemical Lesions in Macaque Nucleus Reticularis Tegmenti Pontis

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 1178-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Suzuki ◽  
Tetsuto Yamada ◽  
Rebecca Hoedema ◽  
Robert D. Yee
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Ibotenic Acid ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pontine Nucleus ◽  
Nucleus Reticularis Tegmenti Pontis ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Nucleus Reticularis ◽  
Dorsolateral Pontine Nucleus

Anatomic and neuronal recordings suggest that the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (NRTP) of macaques may be a major pontine component of a cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway that subserves the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements. The existence of such a pathway was implicated by the lack of permanent pursuit impairment after bilateral lesions in the dorsolateral pontine nucleus. To provide more direct evidence that NRTP is involved with regulating smooth-pursuit eye movements, chemical lesions were made in macaque NRTP by injecting either lidocaine or ibotenic acid. Injection sites first were identified by the recording of smooth-pursuit-related modulations in neuronal activity. The resulting lesions caused significant deficits in both the maintenance and the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. After lesion formation, the gain of constant-velocity, maintained smooth-pursuit eye movements decreased, on the average, by 44%. Recovery of the ability to maintain smooth-pursuit eye movements occurred over ∼3 days when maintained pursuit gains attained normal values. The step-ramp, “Rashbass” task was used to investigate the effects of the lesions on the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. Eye accelerations averaged over the initial 80 ms of pursuit initiation were determined and found to be decremented, on the average, by 48% after the administration of ibotenic acid. Impairments in the initiation and maintenance of smooth-pursuit eye movements were directional in nature. Upward pursuit seemed to be the most vulnerable and was impaired in all cases independent of lesioning agent and type of pursuit investigated. Downward smooth pursuit seemed more resistant to the effects of chemical lesions in NRTP. Impairments in horizontal tracking were observed with examples of deficits in ipsilaterally and contralaterally directed pursuit. The results provide behavioral support for the physiologically and anatomic-based conclusion that NRTP is a component of a cortico-ponto-cerebellar circuit that presumably involves the pursuit area of the frontal eye field (FEF) and projects to ocular motor-related areas of the cerebellum. This FEF-NRTP-cerebellum path would parallel a middle and medial superior temporal cerebral cortical area-dorsolateral pontine nucleus-cerebellum pathway also known to be involved with regulating smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Recovery of function after lesions in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Yamasaki ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Ibotenic Acid ◽  
Superior Temporal Sulcus ◽  
Position Error ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Motion Information ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Rate Of Recovery

1. Ibotenic acid lesions in the monkey's middle temporal area (MT) and the medial superior temporal area (MST) in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) have previously been shown to produce a deficit in initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements to moving visual targets. The deficits, however, recovery within a few days. In the present experiments we investigated the factors that influence that recovery. 2. We tested two aspects of the monkey's ability to use motion information to acquire moving targets. We used eye-position error as a measure of the monkey's ability to make accurate initial saccades to the moving target. We measured eye speed within the first 100 ms after the saccade to evaluate the monkey's initial smooth pursuit. 3. We determined that pursuit recovery was not dependent specifically on the use of neurotoxic lesions. Although the rate of recovery was slightly altered by replacing the usual neurotoxin (ibotenic acid) with another neurotoxin [alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)] or with an electrolytic lesion, pursuit recovery still occurred within a period of days to weeks. 4. There was a relationship between the size and location of the lesion and the recovery time. The time to recovery for eye-position error and initial eye speed increased with the fraction of MT removed. Whether the rate of recovery and size of lesions within regions on the anterior bank were related was unresolved. 5. We found that a large AMPA lesion within the STS that removed all of MT and nearly all of MST drastically altered the rate of recovery. Recovery was incomplete more than 7 mo after the lesion. Even with this lesion, however, the monkey's ability to use motion information for pursuit was not completely eliminated. 6. The large lesion also included parts of areas V1, V2, V3, and V4, but analysis of the visual fields associated with this lesion indicated that these areas probably did not have a substantial effect on recovery. 7. We tested whether visual motion experience of the monkey after a lesion was necessary for recovery by limiting the monkey's experience either by using a mask or by using 4-Hz stroboscopic illumination. In one monkey the eye-position error component of pursuit was prolonged to greater than 2 wk, but recovery of eye speed was not. Reduced motion experience had little effect on recovery in the other two monkeys. These results suggest that such visual motion experience is not necessary for the recovery of pursuit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Response to Motion in Extrastriate Area MSTl: Disparity Sensitivity

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2462-2475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Eifuku ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Tuning Curve ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Moving Object ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Moving Stimuli ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal

Many neurons in the lateral-ventral region of the medial superior temporal area (MSTl) have a clear center surround separation in their receptive fields. Either moving or stationary stimuli in the surround modulates the response to moving stimuli in the center, and this modulation could facilitate the perceptual segmentation of a moving object from its background. Another mechanism that could facilitate such segmentation would be sensitivity to binocular disparity in the center and surround regions of the receptive fields of these neurons. We therefore investigated the sensitivity of these MSTl neurons to disparity ranging from three degrees crossed disparity (near) to three degrees uncrossed disparity (far) applied to both the center and the surround regions. Many neurons showed clear disparity sensitivity to stimulus motion in the center of the receptive field. About [Formula: see text] of 104 neurons had a clear peak in their response, whereas another [Formula: see text] had broader tuning. Monocular stimulation abolished the tuning. The prevalence of cells broadly tuned to near and far disparity and the reversal of preferred directions at different disparities observed in MSTd were not found in MSTl. A stationary surround at zero disparity simply modulated up or down the response to moving stimuli at different disparities in the receptive field (RF) center but did not alter the disparity tuning curve. When the RF center motion was held at zero disparity and the disparity of the stationary surround was varied, some surround disparities produced greater modulation of MSTl neuron response than did others. Some neurons with different disparity preferences in center and surround responded best to the relative disparity differences between center and surround, whereas others were related to the absolute difference between center and surround. The combination of modulatory surrounds and the sensitivity to relative difference between center and surround disparity make these MSTl neurons particularly well suited for the segmentation of a moving object from the background.

Pursuit and optokinetic deficits following chemical lesions of cortical areas MT and MST

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 940-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Dursteler ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Ibotenic Acid ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Target Speed ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Visual Motion Processing

1. Previous experiments have shown that punctate chemical lesions within the middle temporal area (MT) of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) produce deficits in the initiation and maintenance of pursuit eye movements (10, 34). The present experiments were designed to test the effect of such chemical lesions in an area within the STS to which MT projects, the medial superior temporal area (MST). 2. We injected ibotenic acid into localized regions of MST, and we observed two deficits in pursuit eye movements, a retinotopic deficit and a directional deficit. 3. The retinotopic deficit in pursuit initiation was characterized by the monkey's inability to match eye speed to target speed or to adjust the amplitude of the saccade made to acquire the target to compensate for target motion. This deficit was related to the initiation of pursuit to targets moving in any direction in the visual field contralateral to the side of the brain with the lesion. This deficit was similar to the deficit we found following damage to extrafoveal MT except that the affected area of the visual field frequently extended throughout the entire contralateral visual field tested. 4. The directional deficit in pursuit maintenance was characterized by a failure to match eye speed to target speed once the fovea had been brought near the moving target. This deficit occurred only when the target was moving toward the side of the lesion, regardless of whether the target began to move in the ipsilateral or contralateral visual field. There was no deficit in the amplitude of saccades made to acquire the target, or in the amplitude of the catch-up saccades made to compensate for the slowed pursuit. The directional deficit is similar to the one we described previously following chemical lesions of the foveal representation in the STS. 5. Retinotopic deficits resulted from any of our injections in MST. Directional deficits resulted from lesions limited to subregions within MST, particularly lesions that invaded the floor of the STS and the posterior bank of the STS just lateral to MT. Extensive damage to the densely myelinated area of the anterior bank or to the posterior parietal area on the dorsal lip of the anterior bank produced minimal directional deficits. 6. We conclude that damage to visual motion processing in MST underlies the retinotopic pursuit deficit just as it does in MT. MST appears to be a sequential step in visual motion processing that occurs before all of the visual motion information is transmitted to the brainstem areas related to pursuit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document