Abstract
The lightweight and bendable features of printed flexible electronics are increasingly attractive. Currently stretchable silver inks are formulated for wide traces, typically larger than 2 mm. To attach ultra-thin silicon chips that have fine pitch onto printed organic substrate, it is necessary to print fine trace width/space that matches the pitch of the chips, which may be less than 200 microns.
This paper presents the development and optimization of the screen printing process for printing stretchable silver ink onto stretchable thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) substrate. A test vehicle was designed including 50 μm/5 mm (line width/line length) to 350 μm/35 mm lines (at 4 biases). The stretchable ink selected was DuPont PE 873 and Dupont's PE 5025 ink (non-stretchable conductive flake silver) was used as a “control” to baseline the printing process. The substrate used was Bemis TPU ST604. The experiment was done on a DEK Horizon 03i printer. A DEK squeegee 200 (Blue) and a DEK 265 flood bar (200 mm) were used. A 2-level factorial design with three replicates was selected to investigate the effect of process parameters on the quality of prints. The quality of the prints is characterized by 1) resistance of traces, 2) sheet resistance, 3) z-axis height, and 4) trace width/spacing.
We observed significant noise in the z-axis printed silver ink height measured by profilometry and concluded z-axis height is not a good response variable for characterizing screen printing stretchable silver ink onto TPU substrate, mainly due to high roughness of the TPU substrate. We proposed calculated sheet resistance based on the measured resistance value, trace width, and trace length, which can replace trace height measurements on rough profile substrates.
We found that squeegee pressure and emulsion thickness have statistically significant effects on calculated sheet resistance of print traces while print speed does not have statistically significant effects. In our experiment setting levels, the lower the squeegee pressure, the lower the calculated sheet resistance that is achieved. The emulsion with higher emulsion over mesh (EOM) is better than the emulsion with lower EOM since it can achieve lower sheet resistance. After optimizing the screen printing process, we were able to print 100 μm (4 mils) trace width and spacing with high consistency.
Chitosan-based enzyme ink for screen-printed bioanodes