scholarly journals Maternal Near-Miss as a Surrogate Indicator of the Quality of Obstetric Care: A Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinita Singh ◽  
Archana Barik
Author(s):  
Sonali J Ingole ◽  
Shilpa N Chaudhary

Introduction: Over the years, continuous efforts have been made for improving reproductive health status of women. In India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) has set Maternal Near Miss (MNM) review operational guidelines. Aim: Analysis of the incidence and causes of MNM cases in tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was undertaken at a tertiary care hospital from January 2010 to September 2018. MNM cases were identified according to the criteria given by MoHFW, MNM review operational guidelines. Following parameters (variables) were noted viz., age, parity, obstetric haemorrhage, severe anaemia, sepsis, therapeutic interventions, etc., and analysed. Quantitative data was analysed by calculating means, ratios and proportions, using SPSS software (Version 21.0). Results: There were total 36,366 deliveries during the study period. A total of 315 Maternal Near Miss cases were noted. Hypertensive disorders n=133 (42.2%) in pregnancy was the leading cause of MNM events at the hospital. This was followed by obstetric haemorrhage n =97 (30.79 %), and severe anaemia constituting n=36 (11.42%), and Sepsis n=30 (9.52%). Mortality index was highest in the sepsis group n=5 (14.28%) followed by severe anaemia n=3 (7.69%). Conclusion: Hypertensive disorders were most common cause of near miss cases followed by obstetric haemorrhage. Sepsis was commonest cause of maternal mortality. Early identification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, obstetric haemorrhage, severe anaemia and sepsis; and prompt treatment of these causes may help in reducing near miss and maternal mortality.


Author(s):  
Vijay Kansara ◽  
Disha Vaja ◽  
Ajesh Desai

Background: Maternal near miss is said to have occurred when women presented with life threatening complication during pregnancy, child birth and within 42 days after delivery, but survive by chance or good institutional care. For identifying near-miss cases five-factor scoring system was used. In 2009 WHO working group has standardized the criteria for selecting these cases. Because maternal mortality is a rare event, it is important to study maternal near-miss as a complement to evaluate and improve the quality of obstetric care. Thus, the study was conducted with the aim of assessing the incidence and causes of maternal near-miss.Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology in GMERS medical college and hospital, Sola, Ahmedabad from January 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019. All maternal near-miss cases admitted to the hospital during the study period were recruited. World Health Organization criteria were used to identify maternal near-miss cases. The number of maternal near-miss cases over one year per 1000 live births occurring during the same year was calculated to determine the incidence of maternal near-miss. Underlying and contributing causes of maternal near-miss were documented from each participant’s record.Results: During the period of study, 3235 deliveries were done at the institution while 16 cases of near-miss were identified. The prevalence of near-miss case in this study was 0.5%. Near-miss per 1000 delivery was 5%. Maternal death to near miss ratio was 1:2.67. The leading causes of maternal near miss were hypertensive disorders (62%) and haemorrhage (32%) The morbidity was high in un-booked cases.Conclusions: Maternal near miss is good alternative indicator of health care system. Efforts made toward improvement in the management of life-threatening obstetric complications could reduce the occurrence of maternal near-miss problems that occur during hospitalization.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meriam El Ghardallou ◽  
Thouraya Nabli Ajmi ◽  
Afef Mkhazni ◽  
Chekib Zedini ◽  
Sawssen Meddeb ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (47) ◽  
pp. 3633-3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preeti Omprakash Chandak ◽  
Kshama Vivek Kedar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document