scholarly journals Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Lymph Node Yield and Positivity in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancers

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Nanjappa Ballanamada Appaiah ◽  
Muhammad Rafaih Iqbal ◽  
Omotara Kafayat Lesi ◽  
Sushmitha Medappa Maruvanda ◽  
Wenyi Cai ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 106 (8) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Hung-Hin Lang ◽  
Patricia Chun-Ling Yih ◽  
Tony W.-H. Shek ◽  
Koon Yat Wan ◽  
Kai Pun Wong ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 762-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Lippert ◽  
Phat Dang ◽  
Donald Cannon ◽  
Paul M. Harari ◽  
Timothy M. McCulloch ◽  
...  

Objective: Lymph node yield in therapeutic neck dissection is clinically significant and incompletely studied. We quantified node yield based on extent of neck dissection and presence of preoperative radiation. We also evaluated factors affecting incidence of extracapsular spread (ECS). Methods: Retrospective review of 499 patients undergoing therapeutic neck dissection; 414 patients met inclusion criteria and were divided into 2 groups: neck dissection alone or before radiation (surgery first: 280 patients; 385 dissections) and primary radiation before surgery (radiation first: 134 patients; 157 dissections). Node yield relative to levels dissected and incidence of ECS were examined. Results: Dissection-specific node yield was greater in the surgery first group for dissection of levels I-V (31.1 ± 16.7 vs 24.0 ± 14.7, P < .001) and levels II-V (26.7 ± 14.4 vs 21.1 ± 10.7). Extracapsular spread incidence was 32.1% (98/305) in the surgery first group and 15.4% (23/149) in the radiation first group ( P < .001). Conclusion: This study clarifies anticipated node yield based on number of levels dissected and presence of preoperative radiation. Node yield and incidence of ECS are lower in patients undergoing preoperative radiation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1163-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zubin M. Bamboat ◽  
Danielle DePeralta ◽  
Abdulmetin Dursun ◽  
David L. Berger ◽  
Liliana Bordeianou

2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1103-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishwar Charan ◽  
Akhil Kapoor ◽  
Mukesh Kumar Singhal ◽  
Namrata Jagawat ◽  
Deepak Bhavsar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K Devaraja ◽  
K Pujary ◽  
B Ramaswamy ◽  
D R Nayak ◽  
N Kumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield. Methods This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020. Results From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001). Conclusion Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2213-2223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hylke J. F. Brenkman ◽  
Lucas Goense ◽  
Lodewijk A. Brosens ◽  
Nadia Haj Mohammad ◽  
Frank P. Vleggaar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ava Yap ◽  
Amy Shui ◽  
Jessica Gosnell ◽  
Chiung-Yu Huang ◽  
Julie Ann Sosa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document